Eso’s Chronicles 277 / 3
The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations
© Eso A.B.
All
comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.
THE KING IN HISTORY II
Since it is
European Commission’s Vivian Reding, born in Luxemburg, who attacks the English
Prime Minister for being a ‘Euroskeptic’ and berates him for encouraging
populism (see link in blog 275), it is logical to check out why it is England
that resists the encroachment (take over) of its territory by the federalist
minded EU and why it is the English populists who are singled out for being a
specially onerous species. The reader will remember that in my previous blog I
claimed that Latvians are no less onerous, or—as Reding is likely to discover—as
are the French, the Germans, the Spanish, the Poles, etc. I assume that Reading
The truth
about England
While
establishmentarian history of Europe speaks of the Normans and the French as descendants
of the Vikings, who settled in northern Europe (after coming south from Sweden and Norway ),
they sooner are the descendants of the Franks, who fled from the area of what
is now Romania , then of the Byzantine Empire upon its invasion by the Turks. The
Franks fled from Byzantium to the European
northwest and settled in roughly the same area now occupied by the Benelux
countries (where other Vikings may indeed have settled before the arrival of
their Black Sea cousins), and have ever since (the fourth crusade) plotted to
recapture ancient Byzantium England
The
calendar of the fall of the Norman kingdom is short: 1066 to about 1216 (150
years), the last being the year of the death of King John, who in 1215 was
forced to sign the “Freedom Document” or Magna Harta for the successors of the
Norman barons.
While today
the Magna Charta is advertised as a document of Freedom for Everyman, this has
no more to do with the truth than the American Civil War has to do with the
liberation from slavery of the black man until the Civil Rights march on Washington
It does not
take a historian to figure out that following 1066, the traditions of England France
In spite of
the early Catholization (globalization) efforts, the king of dream-times were held
fast in so-called ‘primitive’ areas of the world—in Africa, South America, the
Far East, India, where what remained of unrepressed humankind was soon put
under colonial rule, whether that of England, America, France, Germany, Spain,
Portugal, and not least the remnant of warmongering Franks, the Benelux
countries (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxemburg), among whom the king of Belgium,
Leopold II (d. 1908) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Leopold's_Ghost
was a trend setter for Stalin and Hitler with about ten million dead to his
credit.
Indeed,
Leopold II of Belgium, with his mounds of severed human hands and feet, puts
the very name of ‘human being’ to shame, and doubly sullies the name of King,
the ruler of humankind, sans the State—if we go back to our early days in the
wood.
So, what
does government without the State mean? It means that human beings govern
themselves, and the King (or God) is but a dream-image that arises
spontaneously from the imagination of every one of us. However, for this to
happen, human beings have to live within the state of nature, the wood (again—remember
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight), not within an urban artifice as federalized
modern governments attempt to persuade us. The latter home-land territory for such
figures as the Vice President of the European Commission Viviane Reding do
indeed believe the public to be stupid enough not to realize that “No matter
who gets elected, the government always gets in”. Thus, whether the opponents
of a Federalized Europe are lowly citizens of some European nation or the Prime
Minister of England, Reding’s address tells him and us: “Shut up, folk and sirs,
and be more ‘democratic’, so NATO may drone ‘democracy’ and ‘human rights’ to
more terrorist prone countries and we may pacify the war refugees by cross
breeding them with unemployed Europeans whose support we will add to our war effort
and costs.”
No comments:
Post a Comment