EC 451 GoveRment is an aLien
People
© Eso A.B.
Nakedness = Flesh Torn of Its Fur
© Translation Eso A.B.
© Eso A.B.
Nakedness = Flesh Torn of Its Fur
© Translation Eso A.B.
“Catching fur” has
not gone out of style yet http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck_WsJvAwDo
. Man has made Nature dangerous and appears to like it that way. Unless
challenged to think, man prefers not to think. Perhaps only when modern society
destroys itself totally, will wildlife have a place on our planet.
But what if we
were to think of human beings, essentially hairless creatures, as de-furred
animals? Strange as it may sound, I have not thought of myself or ever used the
word ‘de-furred’ when thinking of my appearance in the shower or bathtub. However,
the other night, I had a strange dream: I saw a bunch of people, all
politicians, at a beach resort, all naked, among whom were some who I knew, and
one of who was me.
No, I am not a
politician, except that I have a keen interest of why human society is, for
lack of better words, screwed up; and as those who read my blogs know, I trace
back to a misleading history of over a thousand years old, the evidence for
which we have before our eyes almost every day. The not so unexpected culprit
is the government of almost any country, the leaders being the hegemonic powers
or those with potential to become such.
In any case, back
to the de-furred animals of my dream. An actual de-furred animal if pictured
would be a bloody carcass, something of an awful and objectionable sight. At
least my dream found the de-furred politicians an intolerable sight. The way the
dream got around the problem was to switch the dreamer (me) from looking at a
carcass to having the carcass of the de-furred human beings being eaten raw and
bloody. Well, this was not any less objectionable, so I dreamt that the
de-furred humans were kissing animals as when dogs lick the faces of their
masters, but their saliva is menstrual blood.
The dream ended
there and woke me up with the above several images telescoped into one
unpleasant image-sensation. Nevertheless, it led me to immediately connect the
above with the idea of human sexuality, specifically ‘French kissing’, an act
in which two lovers entwine their tongues, sometimes leaving same to reach into
the mouth of the other as deeply as the tongue can reach. Inevitably, in real
life such kissing soon leads to the act of joining sexual organs, which, as the
Shaker song tells, we come down where we ought to be: “…in the valley of love
and delight.” And more: “When true simplicity is gained,/ To bow and to bend we
shan’t be ashamed….”
I am not saying
that de-furring is at the basis of sexuality, but that the evolutionary process
that led humans to losing their fur and become exposed to the elements, led in
time to repression of sexuality (sin, the covering or masking of the sexual
organs) and to violence. Whether this was because we originate in water (as
some claim http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/apr/27/aquatic-ape-theory-primate-evolution
) or is the result of a synchronistic gene mimicking the Jungian scarab, I do
not know.
This raises the
possibility that the color of human skin is not as the Wikepedia statement,
which re: “Melanin
is produced within the skin in cells called melanocytes
and it is the main determinant of the skin color of darker-skinned
humans….”, but is caused by a profound psychic disturbance
that over time changes from blood color to dark black as a matter of evolution:
dark skin camouflages the loss of body hair.
This sums up my
view that our contemporary age is about a thousand years of duration, which
began with deforestation (a kind of de-furring of the globe), which ‘naturally’
led to de-furment and de-animalizationment of ‘life’ on this planet. I believe
our time to be a non-starter. The evolutionary process (with marked
acceleration following the Industrial age), is a violent dream that tries cover
up its violence by masking it as catholic and globalized Christian love, which has currently succumbed
to what we call Positivism https://www.google.lv/?gws_rd=ssl#q=meaning+of+positivism
. As item 1. states, positivism is: “a philosophical system recognizing only that which can be
scientifically verified or which is capable of logical or mathematical proof,
and therefore rejecting metaphysics and theism.”
This raises the
possibility that the color of human skin is not as the Wikepedia statement,
which re: “Melanin
is produced within the skin in cells called melanocytes
and it is the main determinant of the skin color of darker-skinned
humans….”, but is caused by a profound psychic disturbance
that over time changes from blood color to dark black as a matter of evolution:
dark skin camouflages the loss of body hair.
Like it or not,
this makes me a theist (or to use a much older term, a Bogomil) if only because
I strongly distrust science teachers and the governments that enforce their
views. I see the current age as but a replacement of one sort of clergy for
another. By the way, Bogomil does not mean as one of the links translates the
word, ‘dear to God’, but ‘lover of God’==possibly out of a necessity to die to
short-circuit the trend.
As our age comes
to a close, I believe that we will make (possibly by means of great violence) a
transit back to the Age of the Wood or Water, where de-furred animals originated,
and where he-she can practice the only kind of government meant for humankind:
self-government. As mentioned before, the wood is where the office of King
returns to a state where God is Mind and human beings do not fear death,
because the Mind is to be found in the ant and the ameba as well as ‘re-furred’
human beings. No doubt, ‘re-furring’ ourselves means that we again become
cognizant of the meaning of sacrifice, which replaces our age of slaughter.
No comments:
Post a Comment