‘Survivors’ of Government Games (6)
©
When children become ‘survivors’ whether as
dead bodies (via our memories of Waco http://politix.topix.com/img/OFEI74R1PB2VRJSD-rszw514 or Beslan http://www.ajuaa.com/news/files.php?file=belsan__9__579804876.jpg
) or live adults enduring flashbacks of government originated violence, and
when nearly all inhabitants of our planet may identify as children who
‘survived’, cider turns into blood running over the edges of a cider press.
Ours is a time when Eve gives birth with
sadistic pleasure as she quickly ties the umbilical cord, then stuffs an apple
in the mouths of all her crying ones, exulting in the knowledge that all her
Adams came wearing a military uniform, and were sent by Commanders in Chief
such as Obama, Bush, Blair, Cameron, Hollande (put your favourite name here
….).
A millenium after being chased from our safe
democracy, the wood, where we had nature’s goods without cost, and after
enduring centuries in the desert of the city, humankind (forced by VIPs to
become citizens of VIP-made desert) has become a slurry of blood flavoured with
chunky bits of pineapple by government controlled cooks of history, the
(privately owned) media and designers (‘look! how creative we are!’).
Though one may appreciate the dilemma of
government strung out to the point of disaster (an unintended consequence of
institutionalized urban democracy), to this time no ‘survivor’ has declared
himself ready to be in sympathy with the ‘disaster’. This is not surprising,
because no one really remembers that the catastrophe is the consequence of a
series of deliberate False Flag events such as ‘the Resurrection’,
incinerations beyond counting, ‘9/11’, ‘Boston Marathon’, all ‘inspired’ by
self-made mental disasters (murderous daydreams) among the leadership and those
compulsively and ‘faithfully’ creative under their command.
What if those who staged the False Flag event
at the Boston Marathon had not been ‘cogs’ in a bureaucratic wheel? What if the
butchering of the two Chechen youths had not been carried out with the
inevitability of a machine skipping a ‘yes, no’ of a digital switch? What if
President Obama had done some thinking on his own and not put his seal of
approval on the Boston Marathon as the successor event to ‘9/11’?
If a “survivor” of Stalin’s gulags had been
informed that Stalin had died by his own hand and left a note saying: “I took
my life as a token payback for the pain that I caused with my attempts to serve
both the Russian and the world community….”, the “survivor” and his-her
descendants would likely have borne their personal burdens as a “chosen people”
for many generations. However, such an attitude of hope for recovery is not
possible in an era, where governments are proxies of banks.
I may be wrong, and instead of a golden calf, I
ought to be speaking of a gold fleeced lamb, an even meeker creature than a
calf, and for this reason formerly used as a sacrifice the world over. For this
cause, the lamb is a sacrificial symbol also among Christians http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2224/2393174660_5d1a7cd388_b.jpg
. Unfortunately no Christian banker or government official has in our time
offered to sacrifice his-her career on behalf of a nation or community, Perhaps
we ought to seek such a sacrifice to come from the leadership of the Christian
community?
Almost unbelievably (God given opportunity),
such a sacrifice is available at the highest level of the Catholic Church, in
the Pope emeritus, Joseph Ratzinger. As most readers know, the current Pope
Francis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Francis came to office as a result of the previous
Pope http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Benedict_XVI offering an unprecedented resignation
(2013). The resignation is the second one in the history of the Catholic
Church. The previous resignation was that of Pope
Gregory XII http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/pope-gregory-xii-pope-resign-article-1.1260755
, and happened in the year 1415, the year the famous
Christian radical and heretic theologian, Jan Hus, was burnt in Constance , Germany
Those who read the link to Jan Hus to the end
know the meaning of the saying “Holy simplicity”. The
sentence's Czech equivalent ("svatá prostota!") is still used to
comment upon a stupid-uneducated action. All
things considered http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases
, Benedict XVI is guilty of the ‘svatá prostata!’ not because of his resignation as Pope, but because one of
the reasons for his resignation is the embarrassment to the institutional
superego caused by the sexual behaviour of paedophile priests.
Why has sexual violence, including paedophilia,
become such a potent issue in our time?
Is it perhaps because sex is no longer an act
of nature, but an act out of the realm of the virtual?
If we look into the past, paedophilia (accepted
as normal, even expected behaviour for men in ancient Greek society) has drawn
increasingly negative reactions since the advent of the industrial age and the
emergence of the Feminist Rights Movement, especially in its later stages. The
condemnation centres on men, while the touching of children’s genitalia by
mother is judged acceptable.
It is interesting to note that paedophilia seems
to have drawn heightened condemnation from the societal superego with its
increased acceptance of homosexuality. In other words, the campaign against
paedophilia may be a compensatory activity by the superego in reaction of
homosexual campaign against homophobia. Why such compensation is necessary is a
subject for curiosity, but may have something to do with, both, loss of
authority by religion, the arrival of an abusive (and overconfidently
self-righteous) age of secularism rooted in virtual reality, and the tabu
against nakedness. Apparently, such practices are ‘normal’ in a civilization
that has turned wood and field into a desert, and has made its home in the camouflaged
desert of the city.
It remains to note that long ago, when religion
was as much part of society as nature (and biological mindset was ascendant and
observing the practice of self-sacrifice, which included life sacrifice),
sexuality played a profound role in the life of the community.
A self-sacrificial persona (we call it
‘victima’ today), the sacred king of a given community, would receive sexual
gratification as a reward for his self-sacrifice (the sacrificer commonly was a
male). There is no record of sexual exploitation of children, because the
community likely interpreted such sex a paradox of sacrifice, an act analogous
to child sacrifice.
The children of a community often were the
offspring of the same father. In days when self-sacrifice was esteemed and in
demand, women gave themselves to the sacrificial-king in the belief that the
children conceived of such a union would be blessed by the Gods. The tracing of
paternity of a woman’s children, was not—as it is popular to assert in our
day—traceable to a collective of men (who knows who is father of which child!),
but to the sacred king and the orgiastic festivals of Saturnalia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturnalia
and Ludi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludi.
Given the post-modern concept that ‘immoral but
legal government’ is ‘okay’ and that modern leaders seldom offer themselves in
self-sacrifice to the community, the public may wonder whether the ex-Pope
(mentioned above), having once stood in the shoes of ‘the vicar of Christ’ http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/vicar+of+christ
, has given theological thought to the notion that the point of Christianity is
not to Redeem the sins of government elites, but to lead society by example and
denounce governments which repress the children of the ‘ludi’ to the point that
they grow up to think of themselves as “survivors” of gross violence. Is it not
time to demand that the Pope Emeritus takes on the cause of children and go
take baptism in the river
of Lethe
Basil the Bogomil, aka Jesus, called a child to him, and placed the child among the grownups. He said to his audience: “I tell you
truly, unless you change and become like children, you will never enter the
kingdom of heaven. Whoever is like this child is among
the great. And whoever welcomes a child in my name
welcomes love and refuses violence. (After NIV, Mat. 18)
What must a child of our time have seen to call
him- and herself a “survivor” when grown to adulthood? Is not the nation he is
born into led by cowards? Are the children of our age not worthy of redemption
by Pope Emeritus?
No comments:
Post a Comment