EC 478 Hiermalgamated History
Change the World! Think It Through! Do not Vote! Remember:
What if they declared war and no one came? Don’t go.
© Eso A. B.
The Russian Tragedy 2

Hieros Gamos means Holy Marriage, and ‘hiermalgamy’ means a forced or unholy marriage by secular authorities of people to governments through the act of taxation or other violent and unnatural join-tings or divorces.

The story of history as I am putting it together is not because I am a historian, but because the history that we are told by historians is enacted by order of a centralized government jealous for more power and a desire to have only its version of the story known. The centralized powers of the U.S.A., Russia, China, and EU have accepted a put-together history that fits their interests, but imprisons the people they govern into negahistory.

There is little the public knows of what really happened a thousand years ago in Europe (when it was not yet called Europe). One reason is that the chronology of ‘what happened when’ is completely unreliable, having arbitrarily and self-servingly been created by a historian (Skaliger) in pay of the Catholic Church. Knowing this enables me (and anyone else) to arrange the events in a different sequence, which tells us a very different story from the one that prevails in schools. Once we know that the chronology of history is unreliable, we also know that the episodes in that chronology are out of sequence and arranged by the ‘Zionist’ method—the tip of the pyramid  determines.

The history that emerges out of the govRmnt vacuumed sphere differs in amazing ways not only from what thousands of historians tell us, but perceives a human being who does not conform to the being presented to us by our ‘science’.

As I wrote in Blog 476, nature created a being that is “trusting by genetic fiat”. The sinful creature appeared when humans created by nature were removed from Nature and were compelled to live in cities, where they were recreated with egos differing from the egos of humans who lived in nature. If Nature creates beings who know they can trust it and, therefore, be trusting, cities and their suburbs, with their prison-like apartments and houses, create beings who distrust each other.

The creation of ‘sinful man’ is due to the violent compulsions of an elite who emerged either from a major natural catastrophe or an exceptional collusion of violent men, who were able to discover ways to perpetuate themselves as a violent phenomenon.

While I have no sure way of explaining the metamorphosis of a gentle natured human into one with a violent nature, in-uterus autism which is the result of pre-eclampsia, which is the result of a misplaced placenta within the body of a mother, which is associated with high protein count in the mother’s urine, which is associated with stress—may offer an answer. A high probability of rape for a woman is a likely cause of an abnormal concentration of autistic babies due to misplaced placentas. In certain geographical areas (such a river shores), such babies may grow up with pronounced pathological tendencies. If such babies when grown form communities, they may create a stressed community for themselves. If stress in such a community is reinforced in a young person’s teen years, it creates a personality that (given state control over defensive weapons) causes it to react passively (and sometimes adoringly) to a violent authority figure—as the Americans and Russians, both, do—to Bush, Jr. and Putin. This is due to the fact that the underlying longue durée communal personality can now only romanticize about its once independent nature in the wood or field.

The Russian tragedy emerges from the stress thrust on a people originating in a significantly gentler culture in earlier times. For the Russians, such a culture is reflected in their language.* Perhaps this is reflected in the Russian diety Zimnik, Father Frost, who came with the so-called Little Ice Age. While scientists today date the LIA to the 14^th century at the earliest, one cannot presume this to be the last word on the matter. It may have occurred at earlier times, for example the 8^th-9^th centuries, when—so it appears—there begin to occur radical negative changes in the nature of human behavior. This is the approximate time to which chronologists may attach reliable and actual historical events. Does it mark the time when women begin to suffer pre-eclampsia? If an earlier dating for extreme cold is not possible, then ‘historical events’ are even more recent than a thousand years ago—the former a presumption of Anatoly Fomenko which I have adopted as my working hypothesis.

In earlier blogs, I suggest the catastrophe to have begun with the Vikings, who descended from the north to south via the large European rivers: the Rhine, Danube (Donava), Dniepr, Volga, and many smaller ones such as the Latvian Daugava. In so far as the origin of the word for Viking derives from the feminine vik, “meaning ‘creek, inlet, small bay’”, and may refer to female genitalia, and since the consonant D may at one time have been pronounced as a Y, then Donava = Yauna-vika, and Daugava, translate into ‘young woman’ or ‘virgin’. In short, driven by a severe climate, the Vikings went on a rapine. In time rapine became generalized violence and was imitated by the violated. The Rusian elite became expert at it. There is an anecdotal story that one day my maternal grandmother left her son Sasha scream without coming to comfort him. When asked why she did this by her mother in-law, a Latvian peasant woman, she replied: ”I am tempering-training him to better cope with life.” Many Russian nobles used to train their children in this manner”.

*I associate a gentle culture with the endearing word imbedded in a language: Russian, Latvian, and many others; it comes from a realm dominated by women and Sun worshop. The beastial ‘fuck’ and rapist’s ‘mother fucker’ comes natural to English, to Russians the ‘beastial’ is first reflected in ‘shit’, the preoccupation of the well known ‘Pushkin jokes’ [I know Pushkin you shit somewhere. I can smell it. Pushkin: lift the palm out of the pot, you’ll see.], then acquires the drunk rapist gang banger ‘yoptvai match’—jump your mother.

Eso’s Chronicles 203/ 3
Shining   Examples (3)
© Eso A.B.

According to outward signs and surveys, the majority of the Latvian people are poor. Among the poor there are yet ‘moar’ poor: the pensioners and young mothers with children. While the pensioners are the storebox of the community’s “somewhat” memories, the young mothers make the future of the country “somewhat” real.

I use the word “somewhat” because one of its synonyms is “sort of”, while the antonym is “not at all”. Both the synonym and antonym just about describes the state of the state of Latvia.

You would not believe this if you read or listened to the statements of the Latvian politicians, bank officials, “well meaning” ministers, or walked under the banner of the Latvian media trumpeting “positive attitude”.

 

The “positive attitude” is to obscure the fact that only 20% of Latvians believe that the state is making adequate progress, while 80% believe that the state is going nowhere or sliding back.

The Minister of Culture says that by the 18^th of November (the day in 1918 when Latvia declared itself a sovereign state) the “Shining Castle” across the river Daugava from the “Presidential Castle” recently having caught fire (it was likely deliberately torched to destroy one of the last symbols in Latvia of Latvia as a sovereign state) will be 80% completed.

The Latvian media is upbeat however. According to a post by a foreign held bank (DNB): “Growth [in Latvia] in the Future to accelerate”. A spokesperson for the bank announces that though the predicted growth (GDP) for the year in Latvia by the bank has been only 3.8% of the predicted 4.5%, the bank was right on when it came to the last quarter, re 0.5%. The bank admits that annual growth in construction has declined to 5%, but blames the weather for this.

There is no statement whatsoever with regard to the increasing economic difficulties in Europe as a whole. While the German economy is the strongest and most export oriented in Europe, it grew only 0.1% in the first quarter of 2013. It also blames the weather for the low figure.
The populist retorts (at internet the site) to the spokesman of the bank: “He eats garlic and masturbates”.
As for the people themselves, according to ‘Eurobarometer’ for 2013: 55% were disturbed by unemployment, 38% mentioned the state of the economy, 21% were upset by the income taxes set by government, 5% mentioned the country’s external debt and government corruption and crime.
From the point of view of this observer, while unemployment is high, it is considerably lowered by the self-destruction employed by the natives in order to survive. Such government encouraged self-destruction, if you will, manifests itself through the gradual demolition of the inherent natural wealth, which consists mostly of wood. Self-destruction in Latvia as well as in the rest of the world manifests itself as gradual desertification of the countryside. The greatest amount of damage done by the unemployed to the natural environment is due to the chainsaw and deforestation of privatized land.

Paradoxically, the origin of the chainsaw has almost nothing to do with the countryside as such, but is a consequence of the acceleration of urbanism following WW2. The victor of WW2 was of course the capitalist West. Though the East and the Soviet Union, too, was one of the victors, Stalin was hopelessly confused and unknowing why the East as a whole supported the Revolution of 1917. While Lenin had (by way of Marx) proposed that the Revolution was on behalf of the ‘workers’, a long duree perspective better supports the idea that the Revolution was for the sake of an economy that was  subsistence and a government that was autarchic and reduced taxes to a minimum. No doubt, a great deal of the blame goes to the West, which continuously threatened post-Revolutionary Soviet Union with war and forced on the Soviets a break-neck armaments race. The weaponization of the state absorbed precious resources as well as denied the elites more mindful methods than wholesale slaughter of country people to force them into half-digested ‘revolutionary’ schemes.

The confusion by Western government’s today of what path to the future will enable humankind to survive is greatly encumbered by what these have tought themselves to believe is “democracy--the best of possible governments”. This ‘democracy’, a form of dictatorship, has been proselytized and ‘pushed’ by armchair university level academics, who arguably are the greatest and most unjustified beneficiaries of taxes placed by governments on the ‘laity’, but escape criticism by pointing a limp finger at the armaments industry.

One such beneficiary of liberal dictatorship is the philosopher Slavoy Žižek, presently the director of the Birkbeck Institute in London. The following is a little taste of Žižek’s academic phantasmagoria:

“….democracy is definitely bound up with Geselschaft (society as a mechanical, external aglomeration of atomized individuals), it literally lives on the split between the ‘public’ and the ‘private,’ it is possible within the framework of what was once, when the voice of Marxism was still heard, called ‘alienation’”. Žižek opposes this “Geselschaft” to “Gemeinshaft” (society as a community held together by organic links).

A little further down the page (p164-5, “Looking Away”, October Books, MIT Press), Žižek writes: “The subject of democracy is thus a pure singularity, emptied of all content, freed from all substantial ties….”

Žižek admits that this accommodation to democracy as dictatorship comes with “a little ‘pathological’ stain”, which ‘stain’ is nothing other than the former organic community. Unfortunately, the community metamorphosed first into a ‘nation’, surrenders to Žižek’s capitalist democracy with lots of contortions. When the community-nation twists right, it becomes ‘fascist’, when it twists left, it becomes ‘bolshevik’.

Above such little inconveniences and erasure of resistance by waterboard methodology, the professor sits in the living room on a stuffed leather pig, smiles, and says: Look what a woodsman and revolutionary I am! I even make Money here, here, and here .