Fragments
(winding down)
By © E. Antons
Benjamiņš, 2017
When human thought in a
society has been reduced to the dogma of orthodox beliefs sanctioned by government,
the only group that engages in subjective thought is the intelligence
community. The problem is that subjectivity left to itself and without engagement
with nature (yes, dogma when left alone spells autism and loses credibility), causes
intelligence to succumb to runaway fantasy that ultimately bores, causes the
skin to break out in cold sweat, and resorst to killing.
In the community of my origin
(that of Latvija), all subjective thought among the intelligentsia has been
reduced to a facade of pretentiously clever interest of what Others think in
other parts of the world.* The outstanding example of this dystonic passivity
among the intelligentsia is a journal that calls itself The Times of Riga. As the editor, clearly a Globalist,
claims, the journal (apparently, he, the editor as publisher) has no interest
in politics, or literature, or even readers as such, but engages readers on the
basis of like minded passivity bordering on nihilism. This in spite of the fact
that one can agree with him that there is presently no politician or government
official that one would care to engage with in a discussion.
*For
the most part the content of the journal is an endless series of interviews
with philosophers, scientists, artists living in foreign countries. In its most
recent issue (February, 2017) the front cover seemingly promises an article on
the subject of “Who really killed John Kennedy. ”. I discovered that it refers
to but one sentence in “John Cleese’s ‘Letter
to America’”, which the journal partly reprints: re item 19, though in the
Latvian version it is item 13, and the translation of the letter is incomplete.
Among the intelligentsia of America, the situation is different in that the ‘community’ of the Unites States is an artifact of orthodoxy or, if you will, of government propaganda having metamorphosed passivity into obesity. This point is best made by the fact that few videos that I have watched on the “9/11” event, have mentione that the twin towers were brought down my a nuclear device. The presentation by Dimitri Khalezov (a fomer military nuclear engineer of the Soviet Union) in above link—though there are several on the subject—gives the most complete explanation of what really happened. It is still a mystery of who specifically organized the event and to what end.
However, the 9/11 event
was no mystery to the U.S. government, and was a spectacular example of ‘fake
news’ by the corporate controlled main street media of the U.S. How else is one
to explain the ignorance of the American public if not as a result of a
long-term practice of fake news? How is one to explain that when news is
presented, the American media never makes deductions, but a columnist dares do
so, the media calls him a conspiracy theorist?
Some familiarity with the
foreign policy of the American political establishment, will bring to our
attention the fact that the U.S. has been at war 93%
of the time since 1776. What conclusion
is one to make from this?
Surely, wars (if left
unexamined) legitimate the government’s insistence that the country (always the
innocent) is under constant threat from abroad. Such a situation legitimates perpetual
war and takes place of the sacrificial king of earlier times. To quote
George Orwell from the link: “In our own day they [the nations] are not
fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group [in
this instance U.S. vs Russia] against its own subjects, and the object of the
war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure
of society intact. The very word "war," therefore, has become
misleading.”
War or the threat of war is a secular way of providing government with morphic resonance (for more on the subject see previous blog). In order for ‘democratic government’ to work, the government must create a mmajority mindset dressed in an orthodox straight jacket that cannot be escaped from.
In post 9/11 (2001) U.S., war
(beginning with fake war on Iraq) has become a major obsession of the
government and the main stream media. Well hidden for much of the time,
government propaganda spilled over the top of the levee during the Clinton vs
Trump 2016 election campaign. The losers were so shocked by their loss that they
encouraged an overt use of fake news to such an extent that the citizens of the
virtual world of the city no longer knew what was what. Since Trump became President,
the situation has become only more confusing as the citizenry orients itself
almost exclusively by television news and replaces the main street newspapers
with the alternate media on the internet. Newspapers have been abandoned to the
editors of other newspapers. Subjective thought has been reduced to the level
of the Snowflakes demonstrating
(rather hysterically) on behalf of imaginary entitlements for city-zens.
Indeed, one notes that the
Snowflake phenomenon is of the virtual humankind living in our cities, which is
why its mindset is entirely made of internalized orthodox and politically
correct clichés. If at one time people like Martin
Luther nailed their thesis to the door of a cathedral, today we have
returned to the days when the ecclesia (in government and university offices)
are once more trying to nail the people behind a globalist door.
Puddings stuffed into
net bags will soon ooze out of them. Like it or not, such oozing puddings are
modern governments made by democracies.
All definitions of ‘democracies’ are heavily laden with BS. To put it simply:
democracy as a form of government is an invention of city governments (possibly
ancient Athens) after its people grew nostalgic for life in the wood, where
once upon a time true democracy did in fact exist. The type of ‘democracy’
described by English BS, and said to have originated with the overthrow of the
Engish King John and the Magna
Carta, whereafter, England became a ‘democracy’ for the barons whose
spiritual orientation was determined by the Catholic/ Globaliste Pope. This system
collapsed into a civil
war, whereafter England became a parlimentary ‘democracy’
in which the King could not pass laws without the approval of Parliament.
There are many arguments over
whether a democratic form of government works or not. In the case of my Latvija,
it clearly does not work. In the first decade of its existence (1918-1933) the
country progressively moved toward chaos. It was rescued by a coup d’tat in
1933 by one of its founders Kārlis Ulmanis. In the
brief span of 1933-1939, the country rose to relative prosperity, and those
still living remember the time as ‘golden days’. Though in conventional terms,
Ulmanis was a dictator, he is remembered as something of a king. However, in
1940, Latvija was annexed and occupied
by the Soviet Union, and Stalin soon killed off or deported what little there
was of the intelligentsia of the small country. Ulmanis made no resistance to
the Soviets, but was sent off to work as an agronomist at a kolkhoz in Stavropol, Russia.
The tragedy of the reign
of K. Ulmanis was that for lack of resistance to the Soviets or self-sacrifice
as a protest of Soviet occupation, Ulmanis left behind a national community
demoralized for a lack of morphic resonance (see EC590) and such cohesion as it
provides. In sharp contrast are the events in Chehoslovakia in 1948 and Hungary in 1956 and
their leaders Masaryk, Benesh, in the former, and Nagy in the latter.
The fall of the Soviet
Union in 1991 found the population of Latvija awakening to the memory of the
‘good years’ of the K. Ulmanis regime, and expecting such conditions to return
on the basis of mere expectations, which were encouraged by the propaganda
emerging from Western governments. Of course, the expectations were not
realized. Most of the country experienced dire poverty instead. Everything that
was not tied down or behind lock and key was stolen. Even the letters that
spelled the name of the first Latvijan president were removed from his monument
for the simple reason that they were made of metal, and junk metal could be
sold and turned into money. Not surprisingly, the bronze
monument to the first Soviet Latvijan Prime Minister, a well known Latvian
writer in his younger years (he turned to alcohol rather than self-sacrifice to
escape his conscience) was left untouched, because it stood in view of the
cemetery office and blocked the view of the First president’s memorial at the far
end of a long alley of trees. The sculpture remains in its position and blocks
the view to Latvija’s history as a nation state to this day, and bears witness
to the success of the post-Soviet Latvian political regime in blocking out the
past and replacing it with a population that has been overcome by vegetative
dystonia with regard to itself.
When morphic resonance is
replaced by vegetative dystonia, one must necessarily wonder how this autonomic
tribulation of a community’s soul manifests itself outwardly. I think that the
answer is fairly obvious: it manifests itself as alcoholism, a phenomenon
that almost surely spreads as a result of morphic resonance that has its
origins in a vegetative rebellion
against orthodoxy*, and confiscation of earnings by taxation. When mildly drunk,
the individual is able to access his-her subjective self and becomes sociable.
Unfortunately, a drunk subjective self soon learns to prefer to live as an unconscious
being. Interestingly, the latter state is experiencially known to a broad
spectrum of society and alcohol is, therefore, often consumed before committing
suicide.
*I visualize it as mildew spreading on bread.
The use of alcohol,
however, is but one of many means used to escape the control of orthodoxy or
unipolar perspective. This is why it is not unusual to hear that some people
feel relieved to hear when a declaration
of war is made. Violence has long been known to create morphic resonance.
It has been used by the military to create bonds among soldiers in military
units and among initiates of fraternities. Similar tactics are used by heads of
governing political parties when they compromise freshmen politicians by getting
them to participate in issuing laws that do not serve the public, but serve the
castle (caste) centered power pyramid.
The practices of caste may
be contrasted to the creation myths of so-called ‘primitive people’ for whom
the first God was a Goddess, manifest in the Sun, of feminine gender (Saura , Saule, Sonne)*
in ancient times, when it was believed that all that is first came from the
womb of the Sun
Goddess. Later, when the Sun’s role was usurped by the male gender, whose
God created the world from his body parts: the hair became forests, the eyes
the moon and the sun, the clay or mud became men, and so forth. In later days
the myth became corrupted, and Atum
(an Egyptian God) was said to have
created the world from his seed and by masturbating.
*The consonants R and L frequently exchange places.
With the latter practice, it
was no longer possible to imagine creation as a purely divine act. What had
been a practice of relief
from sexual tension with no particular significance, became (after the
discovery that male semen played the role of seed) interpreted to be an act of
pollution. In other words, morphic resonance, by whatever name, remained part
of the garden of Eden until the Ego having seized the throne of power turned it
into the ‘killing fields’
(+).
No comments:
Post a Comment