Tuesday, July 19, 2016



EC 555
A Happenstance Witness and The Holy Ghost:
ADDENDUMS
By © Ludis Cuckold
6 Fantasy As History*

*The link fairly accurately reflects my own perspective. Still, the author of the link, links the problem of history on “a superior power”, with which perspective it is hard to disagree; except as to the nature of this power. While the link links history to Hegel, I link it to a coup d'etat against Original Christianity (see EC541), a late manifestation of which coup was the Westphalian Peace Treaty. I would place less blame on post Enlightenment secret societies, as on self-poisoning by post hypnotic suggestion of which the words that awaken have been forgotten, and whence the self-poisoning.


History was not always perceived in terms of a linear sequence that moved from a -1 to a hypothetical zero to an infinite point in the future. Before the advent of the concept of time as espoused by our ‘scientific*’ age, history was composed by and sung by poets, and limited itself to the time of a king and his dynasty.

*The pretention of science to objectivity is a fantasy of the Ego.

Because the rule of a king (and possibly queen) was seen as a self-sacrificial event (God as a projection of human imagination dies in the process of creating the world), he could do no wrong, even if his rule could end tragically (Oedipus). When a king died, his-her entire retinue died with him. We can see this in the reproductions of the painted Chinese terra cotta courts of Emperor Qin Shi Huang (note that the name ‘Huang’—just as the Spanish name of Huan—rings to Yuang or John or herder), which were discovered in recent times. In other words, in past times history was not necessarily viewed as an endless chain of ‘progressive’ events, but as a segment of a given lifetime to which the next period was not necessarily related. We may remember the phrase: “In my father’s house are many mansions.”* (John 14:2)

*When a period of history is seen as a mansion instead of a road without end, it makes sense that historians are poets, who celebrate their time and praise their kings. In our time, academic historians pretend to be apolitical and even ignorant of politics, but for these same reason invent false histories. To wit: a linear history is violent because it is unnatural.

The epics of Homer, the Illyad and Odysey, said to have been composed in the 8 century BC (I would project the epic much closer to our time, perhaps the 3rd century AD) describes a historical event that apparently was of great significance to the time and region. However, an Italian writer believes that these epic events do not take place in the region of the Bosphorus, the Black or Mediterranean seas, but in the Baltic.

What makes history so confusing is the aggressive ‘fake’ that no one notices—at least not for a time. While the fake is a virtue in basketball, when applied to history, it may result in a major catastrophe. We are living such a catastrophe today in the East vs West conflict that is being pressed (with plenty of fakes) by the United States of America, but was started a long time ago by its Viking predecesors.

The fake history was introduced by the West with a play of words that involved ‘naming’ something for what it is not. This happened when the West began to call the Vikings Mongols. The Viking invasion of the Black Sea region—via the numerous rivers that flowed into the Black and Caspian seas from the north and northwest—was renamed the Mongol invasion of Genghis Khan (John the King) from the barren steppes of the Far East and worse.

To this day the Mongol invasion is explained as search by the Mongolian people for more hospitable living space. This explanation ignores the likelihood that the invaders were Vikings, whose predecessors had been herders of wild animals from the Black Sea region who had practiced animal husbandry by driving a species of elk deer north during the summer months, and returning home (and sometimes—as the Finns and Yenniseyans prove—not returning) with the herds came winter time. Following the Storrega earthquake in the North Sea that created a tsunamis that flooded much of northwestern and northern Europe, the herders became trapped in the north, and could not find their way home. When they did return several centuries later, they had largely forgotten their origins, and, pressed by circumstances, had turned from gentle herders of an autocephalic society into hunters and thieves ruled by a violent king of thieves.

Friday, July 15, 2016



EC 554
A Happenstance Witness and The Holy Ghost:
ADDENDUMS
By © Ludis Cuckold
5 The Music of Words

The first words were a humming sound that like the purr of a cat emerged from the region of the belly when stimulated by a dream or sensation that emotes and broadcasts pleasure. In other words, the first words which formed language were evocalized* and were singing forth a subjective language. Perhaps the first words had no meaning, but were only sounds. Those who have an ear for such things, will have noted that a cat, too, may inflect his-her purr from a lower to a higher register.

*English is a non-evocalized language that has for the most part abandoned evocalization and is straining to replace emotion with words become like objects. This is one reason why it is nearly impossible to translate from an evocalized (highly inflected) or musical language (Latvian/Lithuanian**, Hawaiian, Japanese, etc.) to a non-evocalized language such as English or French. The problem of translation increases when an evocalized language becomes a written language, because ‘writing’ pretends to be an objectification, and due to social life becoming citified (thingified and virtualized) individuals lose their ability to emote and sing. The prime example of this is the loss of the ‘endearing’ word in the written words uised by the media of Latvija and other countries that once had emotive languages. **The word ”tūta” means the same as the English word ‘toot’, to blow a horn; also ‘pūta’ to blow one’s breath.

The hum (from the belly with mouth closed) is followed by a brief opening of the lips, by means of which the hum exits with the sound of a vowel which makes for the first word “ohm” (+ a,e,i,u). In Old Latvian songs the “ohm” became “īīīh”, which sound (sometimes drawn or īīīhd in the background by home made flutes or horns were drawn for the length of an entire song) formed the most frequent backdrop for sutartine singers. Of such singing—to which  was added rhyming (another device of music)—came proto language(s). A long time ago the rhymers were known as shamans or healers, whose words ‘spelled’ pain until it became quiescent. Later the same spellers became known as poets, who became the first singers-musicians.

In a society that no longer is a community of the forest or field, but an acultured mob in some city, music is no longer the music of the soul of being, but a harsh ratling military drum beat that replaces God with the Ego of humanitas. The Ego speaks with a voice that speaks from the Tower of Babel, insisting that democracy in the city is the same as democracy in the forest or field. This of course is a palpable but unnoticed lie that prevails, because the countryside-nature has been ‘conquered’.

A near perfect description of a community become an a- and de-cultured mob is my own country of origin—Latvija, which today is  populated by decultured postSoviet globalists. Rock and Pop music has replaced any knowledge or interest in the songs whence the origin of a people’s language. Once (100 years or so ago) proud of its folk poems, aka dainas, Latvija cultivated its heritage. Today one hears its ancient poems-songs only at state organized political propaganda events. Moreover, folk songs now sung in Latvija are of melodies composed by composers of our times. Not even anthropologists or ethnograpers have an idea what the original melody was or may have been. However, the Lithuanian ‘sutartine’* as sung at the above and subsequent links gives hints of how language and music originated from a hum, not all that dissimilar from a cat’s purr.

*Sometimes a sutartine was sung by four women with each one holding to a slightly different pitch and sometimes moving about or dancing in a small circle. This is most likely how the Latvians acquired a folk dance (popular to this day) known as ‘sudmalinyas’, the windmill. Unfortunately, though in times past the sutartines surely were sung also in what is now the territory of Latvija, except for acadamics the Latvian people have no idea that their own singing tradition includes such songs.

An ‘insignificant’ ditty that almost every Latvijan child and adult still knows, addresses a lady bug that is walking up the hand of the singer who is pointing his finger upward: “Bizz, bizz, mārīt,/ mājiņ deg/ visi bērni sadeguši,/ vai uz augš,/ vai uz lej,/ vai uz zaļiem kapiņiem.”* When the ditty is sung slowly and in a monotone, it delivers a melody that for all its insignificance fits perfectly for thousands of folk poems (1 Ai Dieviņi, ko darīsi,/2 kad mēs visi nomirsim?/3 Ne tev tēvs, ne māmiņa,/4 ne kas tevi daudzinās.). What ethnographers seek is before their very eyes unrecognized for what it is.

*(My English translation: Bzz, bzz, ladybuy,/ your house is afire,/ all your children are aflame./ fly high,/ fly low,/ or to the green burial ground.)

Monday, July 11, 2016



EC 553
A Happenstance Witness and The Holy Ghost:
ADDENDUMS
By © Ludis Cuckold
4 John or Zoan?

What’s in a word?

The Greek word Zoe is said to mean ‘life’. But ‘life’ is a word with a big spread and broad meaning. Is Zoe the energy that moves my cat? Is it what is limited to me and other humans? Is it what leaves me when I die? Is it the matter that makes a tree a tree and a mouse a mouse? And—if life is energy—why is life energy live, while my car dies every time I switch off the starter key off?

Is Zoe what the good professor says Aristotle (listen from 8 min on) says it is or what he says it is?

There are problems with the word Zoe. For Aristotle the word means Zoan here and here (both contradictory interpretations though with some elements of truth in both), which word is Greek for animal, while in the Bible (rewritten by Zionist Jews) it is a city in Lower Egypt—about as far from Greece as can be imagined.

For the Greeks, therefore, Zoan (may be pronounced John or Joan) is a word that is a cross between ‘life’ and ‘animal’. We may note that the professor who lectures us on Shakespeare’s “Corolianus” interprets Aristotle’s notion of a ‘higher being’ as ‘a god’ (13:10+), then describes that ‘god’ as being “straight out of Startreck” video series.

For Western (if not Eastern) Christians and Zionist Hebrews the word ‘zoan’ speaks of a city of shepherds (Hyksos, Shepherd kings), and describes a fantasy land, Egypt, which fantasy dovetails with my theory of herders from the Black Sea region, who likely were the precursors of the Greeks; the Hebrews of Khazaria; the Balts of the Dniepr River basin [among whom the word ‘zoan’ remains as part of the word for ‘wild’ as in me+ž(zh)+onis or zoan of the forest]; and the Slavs.

Anyway, Zoan suggests that our forebears did not see or think of ‘life’ as embodyment of something (or other) for an individual alone, but as a force shared by everything that is alive. The evolution of the word Zoe may be seen in the following progressions: Zoe to Zoan (wild, untamed, breath, wind/ vend, undulating movement) to John (Gengis, Huan, Ian, Jan, Johan, Yan, etc.) to many other possibilities.

One such other possibility is the word ‘pagan’ (pagano/ ‘paizan’ in Italian), of which the sylible ‘gan/zan’ also echoes to ‘jan’. About this I have written before, and will touch back in a blog soon.

Thursday, July 7, 2016



EC 551
A Happenstance Witness and The Holy Ghost:
ADDENDUMS
By © Ludis Cuckold
2 Abusing God, Crying Terror

The return of God (the notion that He-She is Being rather than non-Being) brings fear to His-Her deniers-abusers. After a hiatus of centuries, Being again proves His-Her everlastingness by perceiving death without fear.

For most Westerners it comes as a disagreeable surprise that those who are ‘returning’ (bringing about) the notion of God as still being alive are Islamists. The surprise is due to a deeply instilled fear that members of Islam are believers in and practitioners of violence.

The propagators of the notion that Islam is a violent religion are Christians or, more precisely, Western Catholic/ Globalist Christians, and Muslim quislings (such as Salman Rushdie, who wrote The Satanic Verses). There is a long history to the notion of Islam as a violent faith. This history is largely unknown, because it is hid with as much determination as the violence initiated by the corrupt‘Christian’ elite that has enthroned itself upon the West for many centuries.

This is one reason why this author has attempted to rewrite history by writing the foregoing 550 blogs and more. It is all too evident that while the chronology of history as concocted by Western academic historians follow linear tracks with all ties in seemingly perfect order, it makes little sense as an explanation of human experience. No doubt, my reconstruction has covered many a gap with the ‘plaster of guess’. Hopefully, historians (if the retards of today have any descendants) will fill in the pot holes and redeem themselves.

One of the disconnects of history is the story Christians tell about the origins of Islam, which historians of our Roman era [which begins in Avignon after the Vikings are expelled from Rome (Constantinople) and temporarily make ‘Aveyon’ their headquarters] claim to occur in the 7th century. The truth is that Islam arose at the same time or nearly the same time time* as Eastern Christianity, but because it may have seemed of secondary importance (just as Judaism), it escaped the repression (re the Great Schism of 1054). The West imposed such repression at a latter date by means of the holocaust of the German Reich in the 20th century, and ‘democratic exceptionalism’ of the U.S. in the 21st century. Actually, the Christians of the East, the Muslims, and the Jews stem from the same shamanistic Christianity [such as the Waldensians (9-20+) may represent] that prevailed before the arrival of the Vikings** from northern Europe. Another indication that Orthodox Christians, Jews, and Muslims are of same geographic origin is that tney form the major groups of people in Russia.

*Many of the so-called conquests of Islam will turn out to be but reconquests of former Byzantine Christian territories seized by the Vikings as they fled West from uprisings against them in the East. **Vikings likely originate from herders who lived round about the Black Sea, who drove their herds north during the summer months. When trapped in the north by a natural catastrophe (possibly successive Storrega tsunamis ), the herders of animals turned into killers of their herds, which gave rise to the notion that ‘prehistoric’ man made his-her living as “hunters-gatherers”. The disastrous consequences of conclusions made by citified historians and anthropologists (born to virtual reality they reversed the order of things and made natural reality into a virtual reality) is reflected in the story (“The White Ship”) by Kirghiz writer Chingiz Aitmatov.

As we know, the theology, written into the ‘New’ Testament, of Western or Catholic Christsianity has prevailed until our day, and whines of its innocenses in the catastrophe its ideology has brought humankind, and—typical of the bizarre Western sense of humor— puts the blame of violence on ‘violent’ Islam.

 

Sunday, July 3, 2016



EC 550
A Happenstance Witness and The Holy Ghost:
ADDENDUMS
By © Ludis Cuckold
1 Visions of Continuous Death

God is dead—Nietzsche was among the first to say. But is this so? The truth is that He is continually being murdered by secular goverments, their elites, and quislings. The murder is not an actual physical murder as happened when Cain killed Abel, but a psychological phenomenon, an act in our heads.


The instrument of such murder is doubt.

Doubt is nothing new. Most of us have heard the phrase “I do believe, help me overcome my unbelief” (Mark 9:18-29). While most of us think that unbelief may be overcome by an act of will, Jesus (or John Basil) informs the father of the epileptic(?) boy that it [the cure] may happen “only with prayer”. But a footnote at the bottom of the page (of above link) adds that in some versions of the text the word “fasting” is added. In effect, are we being told that a cure may be affected “With prayer and fasting”?

 


I find the footnote an informative addition—as fasting is an ancient practice. Among native American Indians, fasting is known as “a vision quest”. Is Jesus suggesting that miracles are brought into being by visions brought on by fasting? Is this because fasting breaches barriers between this and that world? Is a vision a form of energy flow, a bridge between here and there?



Most people in our day have no idea what fasting means. Yet among the Islamic people, fasting continues to be common practice, for example during the month of Ramadan. This suggests that Islamic people are likely more assured about themselves than Christians, who have come to accept government strictures  and discouragements (no less persistent as government condemnation of ‘drug’ use) against seeking visions. This ought tells us that the government of the West has succeeded in persuading itself that murder of God has at last been as successful as the repeal of the Glass-Steagall legislation. In effect, the secular government of the U.S., celebrated the end of the second millennium by killing God, hopefully for the last time, in 1999. It seems most Americans are in agreement with the deed as no one is asking for a repeal of the repeal.