Children Must Not Know or Remember
By © Anton
Vendamencsh, 2017
Chapter 17/ On The Prophecy of Armageddon 3
The axis of the East-West conflict is not North to South
as interpreters of Revelation of John are wont to tell. The false interpreters
have swallowed the bait cast by Rome,
hook and sinker. The West has poisoned itself with the lead that sank the hook
that was hooked to the bait of the written word. Hook and written law are now sinking
fast. War will no longer protect society from its enemies. Law is destined to
become a farce exercised by a secular eclesia known as government. At last,
history as we know it, is coming to a time when attempts will be made to retell
it in truth. What follows is a sketch of the Thousand Year Reich, we are about
to exit from. In short, the First World War did not occur in 1914. Rather ...
...The First
World War (~1054) was against universal Christianity as practiced in
Eastern Europe and led by its Sacred Kings. This First World War, currently known
as the Great
Schism, was initiated by then nascent secular Catholic Church.
The latter was most likely established by Viking** princes in opposition to the
Christian beliefs of a people living in the wood and field. History books
misname this war as the Peloponnesian War, which was
fought in and about what is now Greece and the hoof of Italy. The losers in the
war were the Athenians (or Anathemanians), while the winners were Spartans* or
what we call Westerners. The war was over what kind of Christianity would the
heirs of the Vikings be guided by. Clearly (for reasons worth closer
investigation), they chose to have no Sacred King of their own. The reasons for
rejecting a Sacred King of their own are not clear, but the story of Moses
coming down from the mountain and discovering his people dancing around a
golden calf is an early attempt at explaining it.
*Spartans from the word ‘spalts’/ sparts. In my native
Latvijan the word means ‘handle’ or hilt, like the hilt of a sword. ‘Spalts’ in
turn may have evolved from ‘spaits’, the ray of the sun, probably as a romantic
interpretation of the glint of a sword.
**Vikings (meaning waders of rivers) likely originated
from herders of ‘reindeer’ from the Black Sea reģions who were trapped by a
cataclysmic event in northern Europe in relatively recent times. When these herders
(originally named gans/ gens/ jans from which the name John) returned to the
lands of their origin by way of the Volga, Dniepr, and Donau rivers, they had
turned from Herders into warriors.
The Second World War (1202-1204) was what is now known
as the Fourth Crusade. The crusade was a no holds barred attack
by Western Vikings against the city of Jerusalem (also known as Byzantium, Constantinople,
Istanbul). Though today historians give any number of weak explanations why the
crusade did not end up in the Jerusalem of today, the reason is that the city
of Jerusalem today never was where it is now, but was established by the
British only after Napoleons campaign in Palestine (1799). The French campaign,
a long time in planning, caused the British to became
anxious that the French would gain the upper hand in Palestine, which is why the
Brits turned to the Jews to check the French. For all the lies about the Fourth
Crusade, it is generally acknowledged, that it was the first war of Christians
against Christians. It is obvious that the aim of the war was to try impose on Eastern
patriarhs the dictatorship of the Pope by erasing Jerusalem from the map and
replacing it with Rome*. The story that Rome had outgrown itself and therefore needed
to established another Rome or Constantinople is pure fiction and reversal of historic
fact.
*Rome
like Jerusalem comes from a word meaning ‘nest’ in the wood. The story of
Romulus and Remus (two brothers suckled by a wolf) attests to the words origin
in the wood. In my Latvija, many homesteads of old and in the wood were named
‘Roma’. Some of these nests retain their name still. The so-called Roma or
gypsies are not migrants from long ago India come to Europe, but homeless
former byzantines surviving by their wits in a witless Europe.
The Third World War (1453) was an attack of the East
against the West—the so-called Ottoman attack against Western Christian
Jerusalem. In 1204 Jerusalem was renamed Constantinople. The fall of Constantinople was the beginning of a seventy-six
year long war that consisted of a series of wars, which culminated in the siege of Vienna in 1529*. For all their trying, the Ottomans, led by Suleiman
the Magnificent,
failed to seize Vienna. Still, the wars went
on and continue to this day. We ought to remind ourselves that the Ottomans or
Muslims—contrary to the lies of historians—were an offshoot of early
Christendom that remained, more or less, intact. Its ‘truth’ was in observing
the notion that self-discipline (and sacrifice) is necessary to good
government.
*The
fall of Constantinople and the long series of wars that followed it may, in
retrospect, be seen as an attack by the precursors of ISIS against a West that
had usurped the Christianity of its forebeas. For this reason, it cannot be
denied that unless Western Christianity returns to its Eastern roots, many
Christians will eventually convert to Islam.
The Fourth World War (1700-1721) is known as the Great Northern War and involved Sweden and Russia.
Sweden lost the war. Though this was not the only war against Russia that the
Swedes (and Poles and Lithuanians) were involved in, it was something of a last
gasp effort by the Swedes (former Vikings) to replace Eastern Christendom with
their own mystical version of it (Swedenborg).
WW4 was a
test of tsar Peter I’s
(aka Peter the Great) policy of modernization of Russia according to the
example set by the West. Born a Romanov (or Romanizer), Peter I Romanized and westernized
Russia by the back door, so to speak. When the Swedish King Charles XII was defeated
in the lands formerly known as Livonia, the Swedes retreated from the eastern
shore of the Baltic Sea and left them to Peter I, who was followed by Catherine
the Great (possibly a Latvijan country girl forced by circumstances of war to
become a harlot for Russian military officers) took a giant step in turning the
Natural world into a city-led Virtual world. While this was a major tragedy for
the Natural world and the East, and led to the westernization of Russia and universalization
of the ideology of globalization, the recovery from the war offered the long repressed
Balts* a chance at renascence.
*According
to the Lithuanian anthropologist Marija Gimbutas, the Balts originate from the
inhabitants of the basin of the Dniepr River. It was Viking aggression that
forced the Balts (Belorussians, Lithuanians, Latvijans, Poles, the Roma, and
Israelites) to move north, northwest. Unfortunately, the geographical position
found the Balts between the West and the East, which over a period of time forced
them to submit to the one or the other.
The
renascence of the Balts began with the introduction of the pietist movement
that followed the murder by the Globalists of Jan Hus
(1370-1415). The post-Hussite Christian movement evolved into a number of
factions, major branch of which were the Herrnhuters and the Lutherans. The
Herrnhuters (preceding the Lutherans by a century) were invited into the
‘pagan’ countryside of former Livonia by the German barons, who served as
bureaucrats for the Russian tsar. The reason for the invitation of pietists was to revive a peasantry
demoralized by war and to rebuild the work force for the Russian-German bureaucracy.
The step was regretted almost immediately and repressive measures were taken
almost immediately.
The Fifth World War was Napoleon’s Invasion of Russia in 1812. Some 700 years had passed
since the Great Schism. Nevertheless, for all the compromises it had to make, Russia
had managed to maintain an identity of its own. This made the West uneasy.
Though
compromised, the East had managed to maintain much of its ancient character and
was still bound to the land. All the same, the court nobility of the romanizers,
who had settled in St. Petersburg, was no less eager than the West to deprive
God of His power.* The difference between the East and the West, at this stage
of history, was that while the religious pietists in the East—following the
repression of the pietist movement West and East—metamorphosed itself into a secular-atheist-communist
ideology, the same in the West took a mystic route, which surrendered religion
into the hands of virtualists. In effect, while the pietists transgressed
against Faith and made God personal and Real**, the same in the West played
into the hands of the materilists by turning to mysticism and becoming obscurantist.
*God’s
power or Eastern Christianity was exposed to constant duress by the secular
powers, the latter of which was represented by the anti-Christs Nikon and Peter I, and in recent times by
Stalin. The demonization of Stalin by the West in our times is true only to the
extent that he mirrors Christ as Pantocrator. Looking into the
eyes of Jesus of today and Jesus as Pantocratr tell the difference between
Jesus then and now: it is the difference between those who are meek and who
look into the eyes of the ruler with conviction and authority.
**the
Real is demonized and ridiculed in the
West. The ridicule is best summarized in the novel by Arthur Koestler, re Darkness at Noon. Perhaps because
Koestler writes the novel as a communist disappointed in Stalin’s show trials
of 1938, his portrayal of the victim, Rubashov, an old Bolshevik, correctly
reflects the respect such victims had toward the Pantocrator’s, i.e., Sacred
King’s judgment.
Sensing, if
not quite understanding, the danger brewing in the East (the Swedish Nobels
were manufacturing arms in the West as well as the East), Napoleon was
determined to take advantage of chaos stirred up by the French Revoluution and
seize Russia for the materialists. This led to a most devastating war a hundred
years later.
The Sixth World War was what we call the First World War. The spark for the war was the
assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand—heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire—by
a Serb nationalist, whose ambitions for a free Serbia were supported by Russia.
The Western
powers, raised in the tradition of Napoleon, imagined—all over again—that here
was an opportunity to settle the Serbian (Russian) question once and for all. As
suggested above—the ‘question’ had metamorphosed (over a periof of 700 years) by
way of a Christianity practiced by forest and country dwellers into a city
dweller or worker, aka Bolshevik, led Communist movement. The Bolshviks were
the by-product of taxation, which originally had been designed to keep the city
princes in power. Given that the nature of human character is more persuasive
than princely power, city-workers were threatening the princes with rebellion.
While rebellion had not yet broken into the open at the beginning of the war,
in Russia it virtually exploded by the end of it.
Contrary to
Western (and western influenced Eastern) historians, the Russian Revolution
(1917) was in fact an Eastern peasant revolution, which had transmuted itself
from an earlier religious rebellion into a secular one. Because the battle
ground was no longer the countryside but the city, and factory workers were
easier accessible and made into soldiers than the peasantry, academic
historians (mostly city dwellers) continue to preach that the Russian Revolution
was in the name of Virtual or city led rather than Natural society.
The Seventh World War, aka World War Two (1939-1945), was—as
all here listed wars have been—a continuation of the previous wars between two
Christian factions. The division of the spheres of influence between Hitler and
Stalin (via the infamous Molotov-Ribentrop
Pact) was another
fake treaty to settle the schism that has separated the world since the Great
Schism. On the later occasion the major victims were not the people of
southeastern, but of northeastern Europe (the author’s birthplace of Latvija
among them), who had succumbed to Western Catholic-Globalist propaganda. Not
surprisingly, the atheist chekists of Latvija, descended from the Hussite
faction known as Taborites, were in the forefront among those who
revenged their pietist Moravian forebears. Sadly, the revenge hurt their own
countrymen and the supporters of the Ultraquist faction most. The history of
the Latvijan Cheka (a secular Taborite faction) is history hid from present-day
Latvijans most.
Because the
United States of America is an island continent separated from the
European-Asian landmass by the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, its strategy vis a
vis Eastern Christianity and Russia has followed a different path. Unlike the
Europeans, it has no ax to grind with the Russian orthodox. One obvious reason
for the indifference is because the Russian Orthodox long ago adopted the
Catholic and Western originated story of Christian history, to which the
secularist U.S. subscribes whole heartedly.
Much like
the entry of Russia into war with Japan at the end of WW2, the U.S. entry into
the European war was opportunistic. Neither WW1 or 2 (WWs5 and 6) threatened
the U.S. directly. In retrospect, the major objectives of the U.S. government in
entering these wars were 1) to establish the State of Israel as a foothold in
the Middle East oil region; and 2) to intimidate the European states—with the
assistance of military power (NATO)—into a European Military Union. U.S.entries
into the Eurasian geopolitical wars were not to check the Eastern Church, but
to check its descendants, turned secular communists, from spreading their
influence among the Catholic-globalist world arena. The establishment of the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1913 is no accident, but an
event led by city princes (J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., et al) in
response to the rising tide of Populist opposition to their exploitation of
human and commodity resources.
The Eighth World War is what everyone is now waiting for.
The cause of the war, likely of an unanticipated spark in an unanticipated
location, is over whether the future belongs to globalists of the city
or populists-ludies* of the countryside. While this writer bets that the
countryside will win by default, the question is whether the countryside will
return to the people of the wood from whom it was taken by the princes and
city-zens or be taken over by migrants from Africa after the unholy city goes
up in smoke.
*Ludies
from Ludites, German Leute, whence kings Louis, Ludwig, Judah.
No comments:
Post a Comment