Saturday, January 27, 2018



The Glass Ele-phant
By © Anton Vendamencsh, 2017

Chapter 4/Putin’s Comment on Christianity 2

If we are to take our present world and the projections it makes as to its future, it will not be surprising if we arrive at a model of reality that has no place for past human experience and no idea how our ancestors percieved the world.*

*A major misconception about our precursors comes from anthropologists, who by means of the popular media have perpetrated the notion that we derive from a people who were ”hunters and gatherers’’. The plain truth is that these anthropologists are for the most part city dwellers and have little notion of life in the countryside. A few seasons spent among the natives followed by a return to the university is hardly likely to eliminate misconceptions and prejudices that have been accumulaed by living a virtual life in the city. Fact is that our forebears were ”herders and gatherers”. A huge diference that.

At the very least, this proves that contemporary humankind is caught up in a realty that  simulates the environment created by its misleading mindset and justifies shortsightedness by calling it by a ‘sainted’ word spelled ‘science’. The mindset of so-called modern times has no place for the past and no interest in what really happened there.

When Russia’s President Putin made his observation concerning ‘communism’ as an equivalent of religion (see above link), he provoked disbelief among the majority of today’s so-called Christians who are steeped in Catholic theology, re: that the Christian world is based on the exercise of coercion by a government that on behalf of Jesus exercises taxation. This fact alone dates the ‘drang’ of Catholic theology and the New Testament as a product of post Gutenberg times, and the history of Christian religion as a simulation by an academia long compromised by the secular religious state. When one thinks of it, the early Christians were not sacrificed in a Roman circus, but the circus is a mirror image of auto-da-fe performances in medieval town squares.

Evidence of secular origin for the”word of God’’ comes from the fact that the People were denied access to it, but were to accept the ‘Word’ from a clergy that monopolized it. In the 11th century the Pope had greater power than the kings, what with the right of the Church to tax and confiscate the property of pagans (a word that derives from pa-Jans), who were herders and forest dwellers. Indeed, the word ‘pagan’ is a word that means herder—not an anti-Christian bitch or devil*. Linguists and anthropologists, unable to shake off past prejudices, continue to deliberately misinform the public about the meaning of this and other words.

*devil—a word that has been demonized by the holders to Catholic theology. Its origin can be traced to the Lithuanian ‘Dievas’ (Dievs, Deus, etc.). By adding to the word a suffix, such as ‘inysh’ (iņš) in Latvian, the latter became ‘dieveliņš’ (currently written ‘dīvaliņš’), meaning a man or woman posssed by God. In fact, the oldest cemetary in Valmiera, the city of origin of the Moravian Church in Latvija, is known as the Dīvala cemetery. Unfortunately, the origin of the self-consciousness of the Latvijan people in post medieval times continues to be denied to this day. The cemetary was reconsecrated by the Lutherans and is now said to hold the bodies of those who lost their lives in World War 1. While pietist spirit posessions were ridiculed by neoChristians, those of an older (preCatholic) tradition prefered to humor such, wherefore the Lithuanian tradition portrays the Devil as a humorous figure.

No wonder that Islam has gained the uppers hand over a Christianity.misled by our so-called progressive age and a globalist Pope Francis, who continues to reword and virtualize the Scriptures from the pulpit of a popemobile. The excuse for Catholicism that existed in spite of its unwarranted presumptions to spiritualy govern humankind is that it perpetuates Jesus’s message of love and kindness, can hardly pretend to be an imitation of Christ by—one hopes—the last of popes. No doubt, the absence of charisma in contemporary Christianity is one of the reasons why Islam (an early attempt to communisticize Christianity) is now gaining an upper hand.

President Putin spoke true. However, it is doubtful that Putin understands the full extent of what his words mean. Surely, he intuits that communism is the result of a metamorphosis (getting out of hand) of Christianity among believers after it was denied by its preachers. But he does not understand that for either Christianity or Communism to function, its leaders must not lead by law alone, but foremost by personal example. Though Putin appears to be a comination of a secular and spiritual leader that Russia is in great need of, he has not preached leadership by example, but only by a failed and sentimentalized tradition. As I have argued above, such a tradition is a Catholic (aka Globalist) corruption of leadership. This form of guidance was eliminated in the West by means of a violent denial of the divine origin of its Kings*. No lesser denial of the Russian Krivs** was instituted by forcing on the Russians the Romanov series of city bred Kings.

*Krivs—according to the rules of Grimm’s Law regarding consonant shifts, this word translates into the Latvijan word ‘klibs’, which means ‘one who limps’. Thus, a kriv, which in Latvijan stands for, both, priest and Krievs (i.e. Russian), leads us back to the story of the limping King Oedipus. As my early series of blogs on Oedipus Rex (Odipus Rewritten) argue, Oedipus acquired his limp when his father Royus (Layus) tested his son’s worthiness to become King by exposing him to the elements (and gods) on Mt. Citheron. In order for the then baby King not to crawl away, he was secured to the site by having the sinews of his heels bound together by a wire of gold, wherefore he acquired a limp. In effect, the alleged play by ‘ancient’ Greek playwright Sophocles argues that the King lost his divine mission through the offices of his mother, who fails to understand the origin of kingship in harisma acquired through selfsacrifice.

**See my argument (EC643) that God is a creation of a would-be Christian community, whose people are in of consolidation.

No comments:

Post a Comment