Saturday, March 18, 2017

Of Cities and Citybred Monsters
By © E. Antons Benjamiņš, 2017

It has finally come to be that the atheist-controlled community of government has become the fake Godhead over the community of Nature.

What’s In A Name?

Our time and especially its youth proudly and with conceit claims itself to represent an age of exeptionalist individualism. Be that as it may, there is no proof that individualism has brought humankind any great benefit. To the contrary, one may argue that individualism has been a cause of human devolution, because it is destructive of individuation, Individuation is not necessarily relativist, which individualism is.

This author takes the view that due to individualism the demise of humankind has been gradually accerating for at least a thousand years. However, it is only  in the last two hundred years or so that individualism has reached exponential proportions, and nothing can escape the degeneration of intelligence unless it is met with a catastrophe.

Let us compare our time to the time that existed in the early days of human kind.

We all are born without a name, which is to say, as infants we all are of same one and undifferentiated spirit. Our specific nature, eclosed in a single organism, takes time to develop and manifest itself. This is why among tribes that live in the wood or on the plain, names of individuals take time to reveal themselves, often not before puperty. As the scientists at the link indicate, the concept of time is not inate to life, but is revealed in tribes untouched by the concept of time only through a change in names. For example, Jumping Badger was later in his life renamed Sitting Bull. A child is often first identified by a generic name, such as ‘line’ or ‘lena’, which long ago meant ‘a through’ or ‘a run’, whence Liene/Lina, Ade+line, Cathe+rine, Jo+lene, Magda+lena, or Mar+lene, indicating a person with a slit (a rend*) at the juncture of the legs, hence a woman.

*I reach many of my conclusions as to the meaning of words by assuming that over a period of time many consonants, such as L may change their prodnunciation into R. Thus, Lena=Rena; Line=Rene/Rend.

By not naming a child until, say, puperty, a mother gives the newborn the opportunity to develop his-her inborn or God-given traits, at the same time allowing the child to absorb the culture and values of the community. As an old Latvijan folk poem puts it: even God must earn a name: “Dear God, what will you do when we all die? You have no mother, you have no father. You will have no one to praise (name) you.” (My prose translation.) Is this perhaps why mothers and Divine Beings sing their children lullabies?

In the course of time, the ancient tradition of taking time in giving a child his-her name, has been reversed. In the Western Jewish and Christian tradition, a child is ‘jewdaized’ or ‘christianized’ long before reaching conscious age. In fact, neither the Jewish or Christian tradition allows the child to arrive at a name naturally and through God, but is subject to the agency of a secular priesthood that circumcises and waterboards.

A step that bests the priest, and replaces the Sacred King with the Secular king, is the assignation of the communal spirit to that of a flag. The flags in the painting (see link) clearly show the transition from Sacred Ark, here already reduced to the image of the icon of the Sacred King, to the shield and flag of armies.

Needless to say, the identifying marks that set apart an individual or community are many. At one time the mark was a ‘Holy Ark’ that was carried or rowed along with the King, perhaps in a palanquin, from place to place. At a later date the ark was replaced by a flag (with the image of the Sacred King emblazoned on it), because it was carried more easily. This happened when there were ‘standing’ armies, which marched more often to ever more disastrous ends. This is how the flag became the identifying mark of the city, which then became the state (city-state), which federated itself with other city-states and became an empire of nations ruled by their cities.

By the time the ark was replaced by a flag, the city had dramatically changed its nature—from being Jerusalem, or home, temple, and refuge of herders, it had turned into a castle or fort for a ruling mafia composed, first, of warrior, later of political and religious princes. For this reason, the flag became identified with conquest. The Sacred Self-sacrificial King, the beacon of the people of the wood and field, became a tool for opening a can of worms. Note the crucified man (in the link) imbedded in the body of the twice crowned eagle.*

*The story of the twice crowned eagle is told in my preceding  book “Kirrti Mukkha”. Briefly, the story tells of twin brothers who but for the self-sacrifice of the Sacred King and the awe he instils are destined to kill each other. Through a make-believe inclusion of the Sacred King in the body of the eagle representing an Empire (see centre of image), humankind is tricked into believing that the Empire is a benign entity. Though the origin of the twice crowned eagle is to be found in the story about  a twin headed bird (see Panchatantra), the ‘twice crowned’ is a more accurate description of what the story really tells and represents.

The story of how humankind arrived from the concept of the city as Holy Jerusalem to that of Sodom and Gomorrah is a long and a complicated one. It has been made even more complicated by a pot pourri of lies. It will be well to remember that before the Fourth Crusade (1204 AD), the most notable of Jerusalems was located at Constantinople*, and that Constantinople (a Christian city) was attacked and sacked by the ‘Christian’ city of Venice. The destruction of the city of God destroyed also Ancient Christianity.

*Other Jerusalems may have been locaged at Jersika, Livonia; Avignon or Avenhon in Occitania; Templo Major in Tenochtitlan, Mexico. The former two were attacked in 1209; Tenochtitlan was destroyed in 1521. Most likely there were other such cities (in Japan, China, Indonesia, Myamar, India, etc).

Despite evidence that The Great Lie continues to rule, it goes overlooked and unacknowledged to this day. To put it in as few words as possible, the Lie involves the reversal of historical events: it was not Catholic Christianity that was being threatened by heretics, but Ancient Christian tradition* was threatened by a newly arisen Catholic faction led by secular princes, possibly originating in the Viking conquest of, both, northwestern, now called Benelux countries, and southeastern Europe centering on the Black Sea and Byzantine Empire areas.

*A reminder of Ancient Christian tradition in Occitania was revealed to a young peasant girl (who was accompanied by her two sisters) through the miracle of Lourdes in 1858. Lourdes continues to attract pilgrims, who go there to partake of the healing waters of a well. Be that as it may, the miracle of Lourdes has become conflated in the popular mind (not to be confused with the mind of the ‘faithful’) with the miracle of Fatima (1917), where likewise three children, shepherds, were witness to a visitation by the Virgin Mary. The conflation is the reasons why in 1960 the Vatican put the 3rd miracle (which would likely have revealed the true history of Occitania) under ‘absolute seal’. For those who seek a rational explanation for this extraordinary remembrance of Ancient Christianity in Occitania and the surround, and the slaughter of its believers, the Cathars (600 years ago), one can only suggest a closer look at history as a longue durée event. Much like a fairy tale, the story was apparently passed along by village peasants, until venturies later it was envisioned in the Real by some of their children.

With most records burned or buried, the bare minimum of the murder of the original Christs (cross roads) is now remembered as the Great East-West Schism of 1054. Also overlooked (and misinterpreted) is the story of the murder of King Laius* by his son Prince Oedipus at the cross road to Thebes. The king and the prince are both symbolic figures, one representing the past, the other representing the present.

*Laius’s name may have its origin in the name ‘Ludis’ (also Louis, Ludwig, na-lud (from Russian narod), whence the English Revolutionaries known as the Ludites, which name is an old name for ‘the people’ deliberately overlooked by English politicians and historians.

At the root of the attempt to destroy communities on planet Earth is greed and individualism most likely unleashed by the marauding princes of the Vikings, who divided the landmass of the planet in private parcels among themselves. To maintain their gains, the princes transformed their forts into cities, and by various economic devices unleashed the cities until they mutated into a major plague, which atomized and devolved the ludis (the people) to the level of worms in cans made of concrete.

No comments:

Post a Comment