Eso’s Chronicles 280 / 6

The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations

© Eso A.B.

All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

 

THE LAW SUFFERS A SEIZURE

 

As the rule of law increased and along with it its imagined benefits, it became an increasingly desired object for control. The early times of self-made rules of the wood were forgotten as the wood disappeared (was cut down) and was replaced by urban sprawl from which no one, once in it, may escape.

 

Unlike the wood, an urban environment is all artifice, which as it increases in wealth and complexity becomes the object of increasing praise of those responsible for creating it—whether it is sustainable or not. The complex urban environment becomes an error even poets have difficulties to perceive, as W. B. Yeats in his poem ‘Sailing To Byzandium’ failed to see and praised: “Once out of nature I shall never take/ My bodily form from any natural thing,/ But such a form as Grecian goldsmiths make/ Of hammered gold and gold enamelling….”

 

What Yeats in effect describes is the U.S. Supreme Court: a legal body so enamored of itself as the lord of America’s urban desert that it no longer recognizes the subjective side of human beings as, both, a vital and brutal life force inspired to resist official artifice, but compels it to send to jail such a number of Americans that America has become the largest prison house our planet has ever known. America may not have gulags, but it has the largest prison system in the ‘democratic’ world, and many of the incarcerated are there because of ‘qualified immunity’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity that federal and state employees may invoke to “…shield[s] government officials [and their subjective minds and actions] from liability for the violation of an [forest] individual's federal constitutional rights.”

 

Even if one may be inclined to justify ‘qualified immunity’ because those employed by the State are forced to work in an environment in which their subjective mind no longer functions or copes with the situations  normally, the State is never asked to explain why it has allowed such conditions to come into being.

 

Yes, we all have heard it: “We cannot stop human nature.”

 

In our times, when the condition of the world has been so obviously driven with its forehead into a ‘no exit’ sign and human beings find themselves challenged beyond their capacity to deal with or resolve the difficulties, the State increasingly falls back on its ‘power’ to compel conformity and/or find a solution among which a kill by the police http://rt.com/usa/fbi-kelly-thomas-evidence-589/ or a war with other States is not excluded, but is provoked, even if through proxies. The following, pointed out by columnist Patrick Buchanan, is a case in point:

 

[http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2014/01/13/a-blank-check-for-war-on-iran/  “Today the Senate is about to vote Israel a virtual blank check – for war on Iran. Reads Senate bill S.1881: If Israel is ‘compelled to take military action in legitimate self-defense against Iran’s nuclear weapons program,’ the United States ‘should stand with Israel and provide … diplomatic, military and economic support to the Government of Israel in the defense of its territory, people and existence.’ … this bill virtually hands over the decision on war to Bibi Netanyahu who is on record saying: ‘This is 1938. Iran is Germany.’”]

 

Let us hope that the bill does not pass.

 

In the case of America, difficulties for human society to deal with were foreseen many years ago as part of America’s capitalist economic system, which unfailingly drives the society to compete with its own and others until a bloody conflict resolves the resulting knot— as Alexander the Great is said to have let his sword solve his own problems.

 

In so far as European leaders agree with America that the problems of the future were beyond their ability to solve and, thus, joined America in forming secret armies of NATO http://www.amazon.com/NATOs-Secret-Armies-Operation-Contemporary/dp/0714685003 , the leadership of the European Union is no less guilty of recapturing Europe for capitalism and compel its people to solve the problems with blood disguised behind a military mask of ‘qualified immunity’.

 

At least one subjective mind concludes that the collective leadership of the Super states, in this case the EU (not only) is suffering a brain seizure similar to the type it was seized by in World War I, twenty years later by World War II, and appears to have yet another one fifty years later by tying the sovereign liberties of Europeans into yet another bureaucratic knot and applying as glue plenty of tricks of law. At this time, the best trick appears to be a promise of ‘human rights’, glazed over by a thick layer of  ‘consumer products’, over those of ‘community rights’ that have stood their ground for thousands of years.

 

Is this really necessary? Is there not a way out?

 

Save the Ancient Wood! https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Saw Cross https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

 

Eso’s Chronicles 279 / 5

The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations

© Eso A.B.

All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

 

THE LAW AS AGENCY OF LIQUIDATION

 

If in the beginning of what we call ‘civilization’, humankind lived in the wood and was ruled by a dream-King who was never seen except as a fantasy figure in a story, then the King was told about by story-tellers who, more than likely, were travelling herders who travelled for the most part with the seasons, south to north (in the spring), and north to south (in the fall).

 

It was the story-tellers who built the first temples, sites where stories were told to such people as had decided to become sedentary and make a living off the wood and its free gifts: animal pelts for dress, meat cured by smoking, and dried berries, mushrooms, and roots, which were later soaked and boiled into a soup in home-made clay pots. One of these early fairy-tale temples, Saint Basil’s (Sacred King) Cathedral http://www.moscow.info/images/red-square/St-Basils-Cathedral.jpg , still stands in Moscow though built at a later date (as a Memorial) and on a much grander scale than early temples in the wood.

 

The early herders of nomadic tribes were called Gens, from which have derived such names as genes, gendarmes and at least a hundred more words. Gens probably meant ‘herder’; in the Latvian language it is pronounced ‘gans’, but gans is still a herder. The many derivatives and cognates of the name are a fact hidden and deliberately overlooked by linguists, who will argue that they cannot see how the same letter G can over time change into other letters J, Ch, Y, H, Gh, V to name a few, and be pronounced differently: Jean, John, j(y)anniseries, Charon, Huan, Ghengis, Vanna (Vanesa), and so on. For this reason, St. Basil’s Cathedral in Moscow, which in direct translation means ‘Sacred King’ Basil, and Basil’s early name was likely John (Ivan, Jesus) the King, ought still be recognized as a symbol for ‘green’ (wood, field, and nature).

 

In any case, these early travelling priests or medicine men were also the first teachers. One ought not to be surprised that it was from these same ‘herders’ that there emerged the first teachers and, indirectly, law makers. These were the ‘wise men’, aka sons of the Sun; traces of this still remain with the Jewish rabbis, if we remember that many centuries ago, many people could not say the letter R and pronounced it as L, thus Rabbi=Labbis, the latter meaning ‘good men’ in Baltic languages to this day, hence “Laba diena” in Lithuanian means “Good day!” In the Baltics themselves, the word ‘labs’ changed to ‘raibs’, which means ‘changeling’ (of colors, many spotted, interesting); the Latvian capital city Riga, was anciently known as Līga, which is a word that stands for alliance and agreement (līgums).

 

In the early days, rabbis were men of the wood and also animal herders who came from many communities. When the days of the dream-King were coming to an end [at about the end-times of the Byzantine Empire (according to Anatoly Fomenko) aka Israel], these same men formed a community of their own ‘good men’. It ought not be surprising that in due course the ‘good men’ came to serve the King as lawmakers and tax collectors.

 

It was at this time that the early stages of later calamitous times were set into place. Though it may confuse some people why this should be so, it makes sense if we remember that the early people of the wood, who governed themselves, kept social order through localized decisions, whereas with the appearance of the King (as an actual rather than a dream entity), there appeared the first steps toward ‘globalization’. This globalization (then known as Catholization) of ‘human rights laws’ had nothing to do with ‘human rights’, but enabled a mechanism that made laws on behalf of kings, princes, barons, and EC commissioners. The post-wood or urban laws were imposed on many communities, which destroyed the earlier local (subjective) decision making mechanisms and unleashed governmental entities that are monstrous when compared to what our forebears believed to be necessary for self-rule.

 

Early opposition to globalized law came from the rabbis or ‘good men’ of the Israelite (formerly Byzantine) community. Almost everyone knows what the globalizers or Reichmahers of Germany did to the rabbis and their communities. The lies told by the Reichmahers remain in force through anti-Semitism in many East European countries, who do not remember—unfortunately—that their own communities of gani, the gens, were repressed and ‘knelled’ by the descendants of Vikings, who settled in Western Europe and now wish to Federalize Europe under a new legal barbarism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law

 

Save the Ancient Wood! https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Saw Cross https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Eso’s Chronicles 278 / 4
The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations
© Eso A.B.
All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

THE STATELESS KINGDOM

We are about to learn as those who lived at the beginning of the 20th century learned, that what we believed was a known known, we did not, in fact, know. What we believed as a certainty now seems to be nothing more than a diversion by the uncertainty principle.

For example, though you, the reader, may disagree with me, you already know that for any number of reasons, the history of the world and Europe needs to be re-examined.

One of the reasons for re-examination is because of Commissioners such as Viviane Reding of the European Commission, who in spite of her lofty title, sees Europe as an old cliché. She is in a way right, except that Europe is an old cliché that needs to be rescued from itself—and not by Federalized Europe. Europe will be rescued from walking into a dead end only when its history is put right.

We are also discovering these days that ‘democracy’ is not all it has been cracked up to be, and that the notions of our ‘ancient’ forebears that the best form of government is a government that creates no State is valid also for our time. It is interesting to reflect that the stateless nation is only possible under a King and when our planet is covered by a wood. The best of all possible States is not an urban ‘democracy’ as the media of our day so volubly insists.

So, you ask, how does a stateless State govern itself?

I have pointed out (in blog 276) that in those early times a self-governing community lived more or less a nomadic life and eked out a living herding animals: elk, reindeer, wild pigs, goats, and the like. Such a community governs itself. But it ceases to govern itself the moment someone imposes on it taxes in animal pelts. It is then that a community that heretofore has seen itself as a single entity, its herd including, and has begged the forgiveness of its gods that if it must kill one of its own, a red line is being crossed and one becomes a butcher. They knew that even a single act has consequences, and a single kill may end with chasing the herd over the edge of a cliff, where at the bottom stand butchers who skins the animals yet alive. In short, as I see it, then and now, the State is based on a foundation of the murder of living things, never on self-sacrifice of government officials on behalf of the community or nation.

Of course, the State takes all the credit for what it calls “growth” and “development”. But to take credit and have no questions asked, the State has to lie. Therefore, the State invents what we know as ‘historians’, aka liars of status.. Of course, there are as always some exceptions http://edvan.fadeout.ch/v2/?customerId=30&channelId=189&broadcastId=1380. Most everything else that existed before the State, historians leave it to anthropologists.

Anthropologists not only dig through ancient ruins, but they also try to reconstruct what life might have been like at the time the ruins had live people move through their space and ate from the dishes that have now turned into shards. Anthropologists also analyze what is left of stories that are believed to be of ancient origin. Most of these stories are known as myths of origin.

It is in these myths that we look for evidence of what the people of ancient times believed and the type of life these myths reflect. Most ancient myths leave us some evidence that human sacrifice was a common practice in the past, even if the story tells that the one who sacrifices is none other than God himself. This brings up the question of why the stories reflect the notion that the sacrifice of Gods is self-sacrifice, while reality shows us that self-sacrifice is a very rare thing, but the usual form of sacrifice is of human beings who for some reason or other have come under the control of whoever are the executioners.

Why do we have this difference between story and physical evidence http://www.mexicolore.co.uk/images-ans/ans_15_01_2.jpg ? The answer is plain though it is rarely pointed out or given by anthropologists.

The story or myth that is told by shamans, magicians, wandering medicine men, or simply story tellers originates in the imagination. The story teller imagines a just outcome to the story of creation—in which the Creator expends the most unselfish of His-Her energies—which is why it ends in the Creator’s total exhaustion.

As there is never a shortage of stories with unhappy or tragic outcomes, the story-teller also imagines God to atone for the misfortunes of creation and the loss of life or injustice. On the other hand, when story meets up with reality, self-sacrifice is much more difficult to accomplish and is, therefore, replaced by some painful act. This is why the sacrificed Others, be they prisoners of war or criminals, is always presented as part of a sacred event. It is only in a strictly secular and ‘democratic’ society that mass death is presented as a brutal act of butchery that has no end to it until the human subconscious is subdued by ‘the Law’, an entirely artificial entity and idealized justice unrelated to reality.

This is why such genuine thinkers as the German legal mind of the 20^th century Karl Schmitt, and today the Slovakian social thinker Slavoy Žižak, for all their genuinely humane qualities, ultimately end up supporting mass murder of “homo sacer” as justifiable even if it is altogether ‘an exception’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giorgio_Agamben

Save the Ancient Wood! https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

 

Eso’s Chronicles 277 / 3

The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations

© Eso A.B.

All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

 

THE KING IN HISTORY II

 

Since it is European Commission’s Vivian Reding, born in Luxemburg, who attacks the English Prime Minister for being a ‘Euroskeptic’ and berates him for encouraging populism (see link in blog 275), it is logical to check out why it is England that resists the encroachment (take over) of its territory by the federalist minded EU and why it is the English populists who are singled out for being a specially onerous species. The reader will remember that in my previous blog I claimed that Latvians are no less onerous, or—as Reding is likely to discover—as are the French, the Germans, the Spanish, the Poles, etc. I assume that Reading speaks for the European Commission, among whom one Piebalgs (Commissioner of Development) is a Latvian and likely participated in the repression (knellen) of his countrymen by his silence and not insisting that Latvian people, not the State, should give up their own currency, the lats, for the Euro.

 

The truth about England is that the likes of the European Commission (a list is provided in a link in the previous blog), many of whom are descendants of elites of earlier generations, have some affinity to the Franks, from whom emerged the French and Normans http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normans .

 

While establishmentarian history of Europe speaks of the Normans and the French as descendants of the Vikings, who settled in northern Europe (after coming south from Sweden and Norway), they sooner are the descendants of the Franks, who fled from the area of what is now Romania, then of the Byzantine Empire upon its invasion by the Turks. The Franks fled from Byzantium to the European northwest and settled in roughly the same area now occupied by the Benelux countries (where other Vikings may indeed have settled before the arrival of their Black Sea cousins), and have ever since (the fourth crusade) plotted to recapture ancient Byzantium http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankokratia . Not least, they also plotted the conquest of Ye Merry Olde England on the other side of the Channel, where the ancient kingdom (remember King Arthur?) had prevailed and retained significant features of a very old culture.

 

The calendar of the fall of the Norman kingdom is short: 1066 to about 1216 (150 years), the last being the year of the death of King John, who in 1215 was forced to sign the “Freedom Document” or Magna Harta for the successors of the Norman barons.

 

While today the Magna Charta is advertised as a document of Freedom for Everyman, this has no more to do with the truth than the American Civil War has to do with the liberation from slavery of the black man until the Civil Rights march on Washington in 1963.

 

It does not take a historian to figure out that following 1066, the traditions of England were in turmoil. Only fifty-four years later, by 1120, the royal succession of the usurping Norman kings was given a mortal blow by the mass murder and assassination of the King’s successor with the sinking of the White Ship http://www.medievalists.net/2013/05/21/was-the-white-ship-disaster-mass-murder/. Following the assassination, the institution of Kingship in England never recovered, though ‘empty chairs’ were filled by royals celebrated to this day, Queen Victoria being foremost among them. In France, King Louis XVI lost his head to the guillotine in 1793; in Russia Peter the Great (d. 1725), a westernized implant, quickly destroyed the legacy of such true forerunners of ancient kings as Ivan the Great III (d. 1505).  Henceforth, kings were little more than the figureheads or spitting posts (as Ivan the Great IV became) for the barons. The people, in spite of their alleged backwardness, held on to the dream-time idea of a stateless government of their forebears even unto the days of Lenin and Stalin.

 

In spite of the early Catholization (globalization) efforts, the king of dream-times were held fast in so-called ‘primitive’ areas of the world—in Africa, South America, the Far East, India, where what remained of unrepressed humankind was soon put under colonial rule, whether that of England, America, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, and not least the remnant of warmongering Franks, the Benelux countries (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxemburg), among whom the king of Belgium, Leopold II (d. 1908) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Leopold's_Ghost was a trend setter for Stalin and Hitler with about ten million dead to his credit.

 

Indeed, Leopold II of Belgium, with his mounds of severed human hands and feet, puts the very name of ‘human being’ to shame, and doubly sullies the name of King, the ruler of humankind, sans the State—if we go back to our early days in the wood.

 

So, what does government without the State mean? It means that human beings govern themselves, and the King (or God) is but a dream-image that arises spontaneously from the imagination of every one of us. However, for this to happen, human beings have to live within the state of nature, the wood (again—remember Sir Gawain and the Green Knight), not within an urban artifice as federalized modern governments attempt to persuade us. The latter home-land territory for such figures as the Vice President of the European Commission Viviane Reding do indeed believe the public to be stupid enough not to realize that “No matter who gets elected, the government always gets in”. Thus, whether the opponents of a Federalized Europe are lowly citizens of some European nation or the Prime Minister of England, Reding’s address tells him and us: “Shut up, folk and sirs, and be more ‘democratic’, so NATO may drone ‘democracy’ and ‘human rights’ to more terrorist prone countries and we may pacify the war refugees by cross breeding them with unemployed Europeans whose support we will add to our war effort and costs.”

 

Save the Ancient Wood! https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Saw Cross https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

 

Eso’s Chronicles 276 / 2

The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations

© Eso A.B.

All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

 

THE KING IN HISTORY I

 

This pamphlet is about replacing the modern government, a balloon full of pretention or, if you will, about replacing Quenelle with Quang or, if you give the word play a post script and 2^nd it, with reinstating the King.

 

If one suggests that modern governments will soon fall and will be replaced by the ancien regime of the King http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancien_R%C3%A9gime as early modern France knew it, one is likely to hear a bellyful of laughter. Ha ha! Are you kidding me?

 

I would answer: No. But perhaps Quang is coming and is about to get you! Because the ancient regime goes back much further than the 15^th century as you were taught in school; indeed, it goes back to the days when human kind still lived in the wood and in what I call ‘dream-time’, and was satisfied and happy to make-do with a dream King and no State.

 

People like Viviane Reding http://kouroshziabari.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Viviane-Reding-1.jpg and the rest of the European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/members/index_en.htm are waging a propaganda war on behalf of centralization of Europe in order to make it resemble its models in the U.S., USSR, China, and other failed centralized super states. For the European commissioners, the idea of a centralized federal government has become an absolute that is identical with the absolute that makes peace read WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction), and equates Democracy with the desert of urban space, where creativity spells ‘art’, and Art means Spirit, though all it is is an attempt to make the urban desert liveable—which even with a million dollars spent on a pile of granite bricks http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/images/Wall_of_Light_Cubed_2_2008_01_web.jpg it has failed to accomplish. I do not know about England, but in Latvia, my country, is has accomplished the silencing of the subjective mind, because the public has not been let speak.

 

The history of what happened to the dream-time King is vague. He has been silenced, though obscure remnants of him are scattered all over the place. For example, the story of Oedipus Rex, Oedipus the King, has now been disguised as the story of a son wishing to sleep with his mother. However, as I prove it in my rewrite of Sophocle’s play, re “Oedipus Rex Rewritten” (@blogspot.com), the play originally was a story about what happens when a King is replaced by an empty chair. No one trusts a ‘chair’ of course, because a chair has no charisma, but is like the EC, a virtual entity.

 

Another remnant of the dream-time King may be found in the story of King Jesus, but this story, too, has been reworked to fit those who rule and who were among the first who cleared Europe of its ancient woods and replaced them, first, with castles, then with cities, then with urban sprawl. While the Truthers of 9/11 http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-most-famous-9-11-photograph-no-one-has-seen have no success in instigating a reinvestigation of what actually happened to the Twin Towers and a third building in New York City in 2001, their difficulty merely reflects the unwillingness of government authorities to admit the many rewritings of history that began with relocating a nonexistent Rome to the East and Constantinople. What really happened has never been told, though some knowledgeable people have tried to raise the question before. Isaac Newton was one, more recently the Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko also tried. But officialdom deemed their knowledge subjective (unscientific), and kept them censored. There is no official word today that Constantinople was plundered by the West and removed by way of Avignon, France, to Rome, Italy. A similar silent treatment awaits the 9/11 event.

 

Still, there is hope, because the ‘West’, including Europe, is today in the process of collapsing. No, there will be no doomsday; but there will be angst and gnashing of teeth, many will die, and whatever the EC believes and thinks, the EU will in a short while be ancient history.

 

In the next blog, I will touch on what happened, more or less, to Kings everywhere, by taking a quick look at what happened to the King in England, the country that EC Commissioner Reding attacks for opposing the European Union or, better, European Federation (EF).

 

Save the Ancient Wood! https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Eso’s Chronicles 275 / 1

The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations

© Eso A.B.

All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

I was just finished with a long series of blogs on my blogspot (Esoschronicles) on the theme of ‘The King’. Among the last logs is one where I complain that all too often when I feel the time has come to end a series, some other topic reminds itself, which is why the blog has a PS, and then a PPS, and then even a PPPS—a Post Script to the 3^rd power. And here I am with a PPPPS to the 4^th power, which I have decided to write as a short pamphlet (= an old name, one that comes from the days way before the arrival of the internet and blogging) or booklet, a name more familiar to those around during the time of the print revolution.

 

In some ways it is only right that I borrow a word from the days of yore, because not only was the ‘pamphlet’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pamphlet then in vogue, the King, too, was yet around in livelier form than he-she is today.

 

This PPPPS to the 4^th power was suggested by a News item at the Telegraph, UK  internet site http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10562740/David-Cameron-lying-to-British-voters-about-the-EU-and-immigration-Viviane-Reding-claims.html. The item reports that a UN official and a vice president of the EU commission, Viviane Reding, slams London “for peddling ‘myths’ about an ‘invasion of foreigners’”, which Reding said were “scare tactics”. Specifically, Reading said:

 

“Most of the things which are told to the people in Great Britain are myths, [and] have nothing to do with reality.”

 

As we say in polite society: “I beg your pardon, Madam!” I am not a citizen of the UK, but one of a full fledged EU country called Latvia. Moreover, I deeply resent being a part of the EU—for a number of reasons, but the main one is that I was not consulted whether I agreed to the loss of sovereignty for Latvia, a once sovereign country now being forced to submit to the dictates of the European Central Bank (ECB), which it came under (with ever less juridicial arguments to use to slip away) when at the beginning of 2014, Latvia lost its sovereign currency for the slippery eel called the Euro.

 

This pamphlet is therefore going to be about what I would have said, had the EU dictatorship (headed by Barozzo & Von Rompuy, and my own government) asked me for my thoughts on the subject. I would have said: “I prefer the King to you, Quenelles!*”

 

The fact that Latvia joined the Euro is due to the traitorous collaboration between the officialdom of the EU and Latvia’s own ever so malleable conspirators against the people of Latvia. The reader will notice (by clicking on the link above) that Viviane Reding dismisses the people, for being ‘populists’ (a dirty word, she believes), and accuses the UK government, led by PM David Cameron as a ‘populist’ and a ‘’Euroskeptic’. Worse, when her words are interpreted right, Reading accuses, none other than the people (the populists) themselves of “destroying the[ir] future … actually”.

 

Well, madam, as the French comedian Dieudonné  M’Bala M’Bala says through a gesture he has made famous: “Quenelle!*” to you, too. The King is coming up yours. Or maybe you, born into an urban and denaturalized environment, would have him parade as a Queen?

 

*http://www.voltairenet.org/article181663.html : “quenelle.” As the author of the article Diana Johnstone writes: “The quenelle is all too obviously a vulgar gesture roughly meaning “up yours”, with one hand placed at the top of the other arm pointing down to signify “how far up” this is to be.” However, if you think about it, given that the palm of the extended hand is turned down, it may also mean: let it lie, don’t make an issue of it, its not a big deal. Yet again, if officialdom possessively determines that the sign is an anti-Semitic--as the following link hints some groups read it http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/powar-calls-for-anelka-sanction-29878752.html . then why not have populist subjectivism read it to be a French pro-Royalist sign that says: “Curtsy (quenelelle)! (and as we—the public--turn our palms up—we suggest:) here comes the King!” Incidentally, the word ‘quenelle’, is related to the dutch word ‘knellen’, which means ‘oppress’ and ‘squeeze’: http://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-meaning-of/dutch-word-knellen.html , which is what the EU does to the people, the communities, and nations of Europe.

 

Save the Ancient Wood! https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Saw Cross https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Eso’s Chronicles 274 / 14
34—Deaded Historians
© Eso A.B.
All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

All those who support globalization do not support nationalism, or community solidarity. The latter is a different animal. “Globalization” is of course the most recent name for the virus that was to become the bubonic plague of the post-America world order, also known as NWO or New World Order.

There are many theories of how the word came into being. Some claim that it was hatched by the Bilderberg group. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10102168/Bilderberg-Group-No-conspiracy-just-the-most-influential-group-in-the-world.html  Yet others say that it was from the Free Masons, a group that began in Britain and preceeded the Bilderbergs by centuries http://www.amazon.com/Builders-Empire-Freemasons-Imperialism-1717-1927/dp/0807830887 and made significant contributions to the process of building empires. As the building of empires proved successful for some, others, too, jumped aboard and added to the hymn that  began with the words: “The bigger the better”, words—“…is more the better.”

But with that the Freemasons encountered troubles. The world was not big enough to hold all who wanted to be bigger, and this is where the next revolution began: the words ‘bigger’ and ‘more’ were exchanged for words such as: One World, The New World Order, The Free World, A Democratic World, and last, but not least, Globalization. At this point everyone knew that the Moove-ment toward Globalization began in Europe sometime long ago, and that it remains to this today closely associated with what the writer Hemingway once called the “haves”—people who always want to have more and bigger things.

The first ‘haves’ ever were of course princes or children of Kings, who had slain their father, who had been King, and who for that reason had it ALL, but never thought of it as a toy. One of the oldest European myths about Uranus tells that the Olympic Gods of the Greeks actually came into being after years of contesting for power with their father http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa011398.htm. The same myth is reflected in the English story of how the English Barons won the Magna Harta (1215) from King John, who they did not kill, but tortured long and painfully (this part of the story has been deliberately lost) until the old King gave up his power for a retirement income http://minbaralhurriyya.org/h/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/qu-est-ce-que-le-liberalisme-classique_pic.jpg . Notice the clubs in the hands of the barons (one in front of and another behind the King) and the unidentified mob of military men surrounding the tent. Proclaimed as a Great Document of Liberty, the Magna Harta, the document that King John signed, the document was not actually such. It did become such, for a little more than a century, following the rise of the Age of Enlightenment and after the Industrial Age had caused havoc eliminating all the independent weavers of the countryside and moved them to live in the city slums. At the time of signing, the Magna Harta was a document of any meaning only for the barons.

However, as I note through out my blogs, the rise of ‘democracy’ as a welcome political system may be viewed as such only while the situation of the lands (America, not Europe) was such that it was for anyone’s taking, and jobs were plenty and the pay good. When one was up against a dead-end on the east coast of America, one could steal a horse from a farmer and keep riding West until one came to California and found a creek at the bottom of which lay gold.

Today, with the environment polluted, the oceans irradiated from nuclear power stations spilling radiation, and desk top machines that will make anything but a brain one can trust, ‘democracy’ again serves only a few, some say no more than 0.01% of the total population.

This is why more and more people are looking for a history that explains in greater detail why what is falling into the sea are mostly hot air balloons? Why is it that the hot air has cooled so suddenly? Why with all that fiat money being pumped into the ‘system’, the system will not refloat? Why is it that we must again learn that wet money is not something a supermarket cashier will accept gladly, but will ask you for a card that you don’t have, because according to the government, you are but a subjective mind, a hubris, one full of yourself, and not objective as you ought to be, according to which you are but a deaded bling?

So what about history?

Why do we have to listen to the historians lie (like chickens that have their beaks pressed to the white line laid by government) that democracy began in ancient Athens, when it was in existence for many thousands of years before in the wood?

Why are we not told by historians that the first taxes were extorted from people who survived off grazing animals and the milk buffalo cows and mares gave?

Why are anthropologists not telling that humans were not hunters (but only root gatherers and herders) until the barons started levying them with pelt taxes, which forced our forebears to drive their beloved herds off steep cliffs en masse?

Why are historians not telling that there was no such thing as agriculture, until the barons figured out that they could collect from agriculturalists more in taxes than animal herders?

Why do we not hear that slavery did not exist when we lived in the wood, but began only with the arrival of ‘agriculture’?

Why are we not told that the polluters of the environment are urban centers built and developed by 0.01% of the population? Would not the Earth return to wood if we eliminate the deserts that are cities?

Why are we not told that our ‘primitive’ forebears had a better economic system than the Ponzi scheme set up under the Federal Reserve? 

http://melnaysjanis.blogspot.com/2010/06/temple-of-melnays-janis-temple-of-black.html Scroll down to Older Posts if you liked this one.