Eso’s Chronicles 276 / 2

The ‘Knellen’ of EU Nations

© Eso A.B.

All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

 

THE KING IN HISTORY I

 

This pamphlet is about replacing the modern government, a balloon full of pretention or, if you will, about replacing Quenelle with Quang or, if you give the word play a post script and 2^nd it, with reinstating the King.

 

If one suggests that modern governments will soon fall and will be replaced by the ancien regime of the King http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancien_R%C3%A9gime as early modern France knew it, one is likely to hear a bellyful of laughter. Ha ha! Are you kidding me?

 

I would answer: No. But perhaps Quang is coming and is about to get you! Because the ancient regime goes back much further than the 15^th century as you were taught in school; indeed, it goes back to the days when human kind still lived in the wood and in what I call ‘dream-time’, and was satisfied and happy to make-do with a dream King and no State.

 

People like Viviane Reding http://kouroshziabari.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Viviane-Reding-1.jpg and the rest of the European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/members/index_en.htm are waging a propaganda war on behalf of centralization of Europe in order to make it resemble its models in the U.S., USSR, China, and other failed centralized super states. For the European commissioners, the idea of a centralized federal government has become an absolute that is identical with the absolute that makes peace read WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction), and equates Democracy with the desert of urban space, where creativity spells ‘art’, and Art means Spirit, though all it is is an attempt to make the urban desert liveable—which even with a million dollars spent on a pile of granite bricks http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/images/Wall_of_Light_Cubed_2_2008_01_web.jpg it has failed to accomplish. I do not know about England, but in Latvia, my country, is has accomplished the silencing of the subjective mind, because the public has not been let speak.

 

The history of what happened to the dream-time King is vague. He has been silenced, though obscure remnants of him are scattered all over the place. For example, the story of Oedipus Rex, Oedipus the King, has now been disguised as the story of a son wishing to sleep with his mother. However, as I prove it in my rewrite of Sophocle’s play, re “Oedipus Rex Rewritten” (@blogspot.com), the play originally was a story about what happens when a King is replaced by an empty chair. No one trusts a ‘chair’ of course, because a chair has no charisma, but is like the EC, a virtual entity.

 

Another remnant of the dream-time King may be found in the story of King Jesus, but this story, too, has been reworked to fit those who rule and who were among the first who cleared Europe of its ancient woods and replaced them, first, with castles, then with cities, then with urban sprawl. While the Truthers of 9/11 http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-most-famous-9-11-photograph-no-one-has-seen have no success in instigating a reinvestigation of what actually happened to the Twin Towers and a third building in New York City in 2001, their difficulty merely reflects the unwillingness of government authorities to admit the many rewritings of history that began with relocating a nonexistent Rome to the East and Constantinople. What really happened has never been told, though some knowledgeable people have tried to raise the question before. Isaac Newton was one, more recently the Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko also tried. But officialdom deemed their knowledge subjective (unscientific), and kept them censored. There is no official word today that Constantinople was plundered by the West and removed by way of Avignon, France, to Rome, Italy. A similar silent treatment awaits the 9/11 event.

 

Still, there is hope, because the ‘West’, including Europe, is today in the process of collapsing. No, there will be no doomsday; but there will be angst and gnashing of teeth, many will die, and whatever the EC believes and thinks, the EU will in a short while be ancient history.

 

In the next blog, I will touch on what happened, more or less, to Kings everywhere, by taking a quick look at what happened to the King in England, the country that EC Commissioner Reding attacks for opposing the European Union or, better, European Federation (EF).

 

Save the Ancient Wood! https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPI4FceVgDDSuUxIJcVFT6TfjBf6IQwE5T0nZB9xmrUUFmPppkD7WJte8Z2M4Hr6pCOlMRAGQ34oPcCr8n3WQK-j-acV7Yrd0kWyLS6qNQrRzzKrt2dsS-iDrr3GVqgtgSkpeSzXxbAc0i/s220-h/DSCF7743.JPG

Eso’s Chronicles 236/ 22

Dream-time Long Lost

© Eso A.B.

 

In the preceding blogs I tell how when the West speaks of ‘democratic’ governments it speaks of self=securitizing governments, which means that the Parliaments of these governments stand for self-interest, though they may have some diversity of personal opinion. Since most of these governments are now ready to merge in one or another kind of federated union, it means that the emergent super states are also going to be super-fascist states; re: Super Self-Securitizing Centralized Powers (SSSCP).

As readers know, I trace the beginning of this self-evident catastrophe to the flight of the Goths (formerly Vikings) from the fall of the Byzantine Empire, which they had much to do with screwing up. I hold that before the arrival of these Vandals (but another name for the Varangians and Vikings), the Byzantine Empire existed in a “dream-time”, a time which remains reflected in much neglected fairy-tales.

If anyone cares to note, fairy-tales reflect the life of humankind living deep in the forest ‘dreaming’ of some far off Kingdom where peace and fairness rules. The King of this Dream Land was most likely known by a number of names: Prester John, G(Y)enghis Khan, John The Baptist, or simply John (Yan, Han, Huan, Ian, Ivan, Johann, etc.). It is likely that this King was real, one of the founding priests of a Temple in the Forest.

Since human beings were still used to exercising the liberties offered by the environment of the wood, and, therefore, disobedient to all disciplinary directives from anyone who presumed authority, the authority in order to be obeyed had to prove itself through self-sacrifice. It was the charisma of self-sacrifice to death what impressed the unbelieving men and women of the wood and named the authority, Him-Her, the Thing, das Ding, King or Queen.

As time went by, the Temple grew, developed, and acquired wealth. The latter caused envy among certain men of the wood who may have deemed themselves Cynics or Realists. It was easier and safer to be a Realist to come raid the Temple from far away than one who was living nearby. This is how the first traitors emerged—from afar. When the men who lived in destitution in a land known as Scandinavia heard of this wealth, they went Viking (literally wading) down rivers of Europe East and West, brought ‘dream-time’ to an end, and instituted the secular kingdom. Evidence of this, if we care to look, lies in pieces of half-truths all about.

When the Vikings or Varangians wiked their way during the 8^th and 11^th centuries to the Black and Caspian seas http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4454202,00.html , and discovered Jerusalem [then Byzantium (tsargrad or koenigsberg)] certain ‘Hans’ or ‘Huns’ (or was it Johns?) attacked the Vikings from the East and forced them to retreat whence they had come. It is then that so-called Goths arrived into the area now known as the Benelux, began to fight among themselves, out of which fights emerged what we today know as the French, the English, and the Germans.

It should not be surprising that the descendants of these Goths-Anglo Saxons remembered the tales of their forebears, and once stabil in their new home land looked for a pretext to return to the southeast of Europe and attack the Huns. By then the Children of the Wood had changed their name from “cross my heart and hope to die”, Johns of the Cross (the cross meant my signature), to the Children of Johns (Yohammads). Contrary to the Catholic Church, founded by the Goths as an alternative to the religion of the East, which claims history to begin with the birth of Jesus some two thousand years ago, the actual history begins with the sacrifice of a Jesus like being, probably a version of Prester John, John the Baptist, or Ghegis Khan about the time of 11^th or 12^th centuries. If anyone wishes to discover more on the matter, I recommend Anatoly Fomenko’s, “History: Fact or Fiction”, 2^nd  vol. In other words, the Crusades began with the attempt by the French to return to Byzantium.

Today, the French, just like the Jews, are a mirror image of their former Viking and destitute selves. Let us remember Jehanne D’Ark or la Pucelle, who saved the craven secularists in the 15^th century by her self-sacrifice. Today, knowing that their nation is about to be submerged into a centralized state known as the European Union, all three nations that emerged from the Vikings are desperately looking for a way out. The French, finding themselves geographically and economically in a vulnerable position, are—like the Brits and Germans—looking for a way to escape this fate. The French, in the personage of their socialist Prime Minister Hollande http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.558565 are willing to risk WW3 to save France as a nation, while Israel and Saudi Arabia are making plans of their own to attack Syria http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4454202,00.html

Regarding the domestic troubles of the French, the following link is enlightening: http://www.testosteronepit.com/home/2013/11/22/the-most-despised-tax-and-retreat-french-president-sinks-dee.html

The cycle of history--fictional history by the way--is about to repeat itself. If Jesus was crucified in 1083 or 1183, as per Anatoly Fomenko, and the First Crusade was the one that began in 1204 and ended with the sacking of Constantinople (then Jerusalem), then the French Prime Minister is fishing for another blood bath today.

 

What happened to the past in the past? [3]

This is a mini-series of blogs embedded in a greater series of blogs that concern the self-sacrificial religion known as arch-Christianity (as opposed to present-day neo-Christianity. This blog first appeared as a letter to Truthdig.com

After the Romanov coup, a succession of tsars not only destroyed much of Russian history, but began to impose on native arch-Christians a state version of religion, re neo-Christianity. The tsars followed the process developed some centuries before by the neo-Christians of the West when they eliminated the Cathars among the Albigensians. Johns Children among the Balts, and did their best to eliminate the Jews. Though the latter suffered grievous attacks, they were able to give the neo-Christians the slip because neo-Christian kings and princes were of a divided mind about Jewish expertise as tax collectors and with money.

Up to the time of the Romanovs, the Turkic and Slavic people had pretty much been practicing the same religion. Russian arch-Orthox Christians attended the mosques of Islam and Muslims attended Christian churches. It was the Romanovs who by imposing a Western chronology and exclusivist interpretation of what happened to Johns (they were turned into Jesus) that started the wars between Slav and Turk and divided the Eastern Empire even further.
What does it mean when I write “the Johns were turned into Jesus”?

Those who have been to India will no doubt have run across the sadhus, the holy men walking the dusty roads of India, bathing in the Ganges River, sitting cross legged in marketplaces, wherever. Once such men were ubiquitous not only in India, but throughout the world, Europe including. While Europe has forgotten these traveling teachers—for that is what they ultimately were—they were known in Europe by the name of John. The Irish knew their Johns as Ian, the French as Jean, Juan, Gean, the Spaniards as Huan, the Italians as Giovanni, the Germans as Johann or Hans, the Balts as Yan, the Russians as Ivan, etc. While all of these names remain popular as given names, they are also still be found in derivative names such as gendarme, genealogy, gentlemen, and so on and on. To be a sadhu or john, one did not have to be called John, one could as well be known as Bob, or Jesus, or Johammed.

But then Johns were prescribed a death sentence: you either bake in the fires of auto-da-fe, convert to Jesus—the only John who will save you—or run for your life to the swamp. Why was it desirable to eliminate the Johns? Answer: all holy men are down to the bones of their souls egalitarians. The Johns preached a message hateful to the ears of the secular princes then coming to the fore: economic equality, economic fairness if not down to the last detail, then at least commonsensical.

The first John whose death is marked in a history book was called Basil and he was thrown into a raging fire pit at Constantinople by the Byzantine king Alexius I (12th century?). The Byzantine king insisted that he knew more about divine matters than John-Basil. In the West we know this king better by the name of Herod.

The news of Alexius I outrageous act reached the ears of most European Johns and their charges. It was relatively easy task for the secular princes to take advantage of the wrath of the populace and lead a march on Constantinople-Jerusalem. Of course, the princes of the West did not have the slightest interest in Basil, except that his death gave them a pretext to attack a king of the Eastern Empire.