EC 478 Hiermalgamated History
Change the World! Think It Through! Do not Vote! Remember:
What if they declared war and no one came? Don’t go.
© Eso A. B.
The Russian Tragedy 2

Hieros Gamos means Holy Marriage, and ‘hiermalgamy’ means a forced or unholy marriage by secular authorities of people to governments through the act of taxation or other violent and unnatural join-tings or divorces.

The story of history as I am putting it together is not because I am a historian, but because the history that we are told by historians is enacted by order of a centralized government jealous for more power and a desire to have only its version of the story known. The centralized powers of the U.S.A., Russia, China, and EU have accepted a put-together history that fits their interests, but imprisons the people they govern into negahistory.

There is little the public knows of what really happened a thousand years ago in Europe (when it was not yet called Europe). One reason is that the chronology of ‘what happened when’ is completely unreliable, having arbitrarily and self-servingly been created by a historian (Skaliger) in pay of the Catholic Church. Knowing this enables me (and anyone else) to arrange the events in a different sequence, which tells us a very different story from the one that prevails in schools. Once we know that the chronology of history is unreliable, we also know that the episodes in that chronology are out of sequence and arranged by the ‘Zionist’ method—the tip of the pyramid  determines.

The history that emerges out of the govRmnt vacuumed sphere differs in amazing ways not only from what thousands of historians tell us, but perceives a human being who does not conform to the being presented to us by our ‘science’.

As I wrote in Blog 476, nature created a being that is “trusting by genetic fiat”. The sinful creature appeared when humans created by nature were removed from Nature and were compelled to live in cities, where they were recreated with egos differing from the egos of humans who lived in nature. If Nature creates beings who know they can trust it and, therefore, be trusting, cities and their suburbs, with their prison-like apartments and houses, create beings who distrust each other.

The creation of ‘sinful man’ is due to the violent compulsions of an elite who emerged either from a major natural catastrophe or an exceptional collusion of violent men, who were able to discover ways to perpetuate themselves as a violent phenomenon.

While I have no sure way of explaining the metamorphosis of a gentle natured human into one with a violent nature, in-uterus autism which is the result of pre-eclampsia, which is the result of a misplaced placenta within the body of a mother, which is associated with high protein count in the mother’s urine, which is associated with stress—may offer an answer. A high probability of rape for a woman is a likely cause of an abnormal concentration of autistic babies due to misplaced placentas. In certain geographical areas (such a river shores), such babies may grow up with pronounced pathological tendencies. If such babies when grown form communities, they may create a stressed community for themselves. If stress in such a community is reinforced in a young person’s teen years, it creates a personality that (given state control over defensive weapons) causes it to react passively (and sometimes adoringly) to a violent authority figure—as the Americans and Russians, both, do—to Bush, Jr. and Putin. This is due to the fact that the underlying longue durée communal personality can now only romanticize about its once independent nature in the wood or field.

The Russian tragedy emerges from the stress thrust on a people originating in a significantly gentler culture in earlier times. For the Russians, such a culture is reflected in their language.* Perhaps this is reflected in the Russian diety Zimnik, Father Frost, who came with the so-called Little Ice Age. While scientists today date the LIA to the 14^th century at the earliest, one cannot presume this to be the last word on the matter. It may have occurred at earlier times, for example the 8^th-9^th centuries, when—so it appears—there begin to occur radical negative changes in the nature of human behavior. This is the approximate time to which chronologists may attach reliable and actual historical events. Does it mark the time when women begin to suffer pre-eclampsia? If an earlier dating for extreme cold is not possible, then ‘historical events’ are even more recent than a thousand years ago—the former a presumption of Anatoly Fomenko which I have adopted as my working hypothesis.

In earlier blogs, I suggest the catastrophe to have begun with the Vikings, who descended from the north to south via the large European rivers: the Rhine, Danube (Donava), Dniepr, Volga, and many smaller ones such as the Latvian Daugava. In so far as the origin of the word for Viking derives from the feminine vik, “meaning ‘creek, inlet, small bay’”, and may refer to female genitalia, and since the consonant D may at one time have been pronounced as a Y, then Donava = Yauna-vika, and Daugava, translate into ‘young woman’ or ‘virgin’. In short, driven by a severe climate, the Vikings went on a rapine. In time rapine became generalized violence and was imitated by the violated. The Rusian elite became expert at it. There is an anecdotal story that one day my maternal grandmother left her son Sasha scream without coming to comfort him. When asked why she did this by her mother in-law, a Latvian peasant woman, she replied: ”I am tempering-training him to better cope with life.” Many Russian nobles used to train their children in this manner”.

*I associate a gentle culture with the endearing word imbedded in a language: Russian, Latvian, and many others; it comes from a realm dominated by women and Sun worshop. The beastial ‘fuck’ and rapist’s ‘mother fucker’ comes natural to English, to Russians the ‘beastial’ is first reflected in ‘shit’, the preoccupation of the well known ‘Pushkin jokes’ [I know Pushkin you shit somewhere. I can smell it. Pushkin: lift the palm out of the pot, you’ll see.], then acquires the drunk rapist gang banger ‘yoptvai match’—jump your mother.

Eso’s Chronicles 236/ 22

Dream-time Long Lost

© Eso A.B.

 

In the preceding blogs I tell how when the West speaks of ‘democratic’ governments it speaks of self=securitizing governments, which means that the Parliaments of these governments stand for self-interest, though they may have some diversity of personal opinion. Since most of these governments are now ready to merge in one or another kind of federated union, it means that the emergent super states are also going to be super-fascist states; re: Super Self-Securitizing Centralized Powers (SSSCP).

As readers know, I trace the beginning of this self-evident catastrophe to the flight of the Goths (formerly Vikings) from the fall of the Byzantine Empire, which they had much to do with screwing up. I hold that before the arrival of these Vandals (but another name for the Varangians and Vikings), the Byzantine Empire existed in a “dream-time”, a time which remains reflected in much neglected fairy-tales.

If anyone cares to note, fairy-tales reflect the life of humankind living deep in the forest ‘dreaming’ of some far off Kingdom where peace and fairness rules. The King of this Dream Land was most likely known by a number of names: Prester John, G(Y)enghis Khan, John The Baptist, or simply John (Yan, Han, Huan, Ian, Ivan, Johann, etc.). It is likely that this King was real, one of the founding priests of a Temple in the Forest.

Since human beings were still used to exercising the liberties offered by the environment of the wood, and, therefore, disobedient to all disciplinary directives from anyone who presumed authority, the authority in order to be obeyed had to prove itself through self-sacrifice. It was the charisma of self-sacrifice to death what impressed the unbelieving men and women of the wood and named the authority, Him-Her, the Thing, das Ding, King or Queen.

As time went by, the Temple grew, developed, and acquired wealth. The latter caused envy among certain men of the wood who may have deemed themselves Cynics or Realists. It was easier and safer to be a Realist to come raid the Temple from far away than one who was living nearby. This is how the first traitors emerged—from afar. When the men who lived in destitution in a land known as Scandinavia heard of this wealth, they went Viking (literally wading) down rivers of Europe East and West, brought ‘dream-time’ to an end, and instituted the secular kingdom. Evidence of this, if we care to look, lies in pieces of half-truths all about.

When the Vikings or Varangians wiked their way during the 8^th and 11^th centuries to the Black and Caspian seas http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4454202,00.html , and discovered Jerusalem [then Byzantium (tsargrad or koenigsberg)] certain ‘Hans’ or ‘Huns’ (or was it Johns?) attacked the Vikings from the East and forced them to retreat whence they had come. It is then that so-called Goths arrived into the area now known as the Benelux, began to fight among themselves, out of which fights emerged what we today know as the French, the English, and the Germans.

It should not be surprising that the descendants of these Goths-Anglo Saxons remembered the tales of their forebears, and once stabil in their new home land looked for a pretext to return to the southeast of Europe and attack the Huns. By then the Children of the Wood had changed their name from “cross my heart and hope to die”, Johns of the Cross (the cross meant my signature), to the Children of Johns (Yohammads). Contrary to the Catholic Church, founded by the Goths as an alternative to the religion of the East, which claims history to begin with the birth of Jesus some two thousand years ago, the actual history begins with the sacrifice of a Jesus like being, probably a version of Prester John, John the Baptist, or Ghegis Khan about the time of 11^th or 12^th centuries. If anyone wishes to discover more on the matter, I recommend Anatoly Fomenko’s, “History: Fact or Fiction”, 2^nd  vol. In other words, the Crusades began with the attempt by the French to return to Byzantium.

Today, the French, just like the Jews, are a mirror image of their former Viking and destitute selves. Let us remember Jehanne D’Ark or la Pucelle, who saved the craven secularists in the 15^th century by her self-sacrifice. Today, knowing that their nation is about to be submerged into a centralized state known as the European Union, all three nations that emerged from the Vikings are desperately looking for a way out. The French, finding themselves geographically and economically in a vulnerable position, are—like the Brits and Germans—looking for a way to escape this fate. The French, in the personage of their socialist Prime Minister Hollande http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.558565 are willing to risk WW3 to save France as a nation, while Israel and Saudi Arabia are making plans of their own to attack Syria http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4454202,00.html

Regarding the domestic troubles of the French, the following link is enlightening: http://www.testosteronepit.com/home/2013/11/22/the-most-despised-tax-and-retreat-french-president-sinks-dee.html

The cycle of history--fictional history by the way--is about to repeat itself. If Jesus was crucified in 1083 or 1183, as per Anatoly Fomenko, and the First Crusade was the one that began in 1204 and ended with the sacking of Constantinople (then Jerusalem), then the French Prime Minister is fishing for another blood bath today.

 

Eso’s Chronicles 205/ 5
Eating Soylent Greens (5)
© Eso A.B.
 

It is likely that most everyone believes (except soylent Monsanto and related folk) that the world is grossly overpopulated and human intelligence is in need of discovering ways to adapt to a situation of not only permanent crisis, but permanent and ongoing catastrophe.

Among the causes of this a state is overpopulation and substitution ipso facto of nature with ‘soylent’ nature. Not least among the catastrophic events, is the ‘individual rights’ issue pushed forward by the ‘democracy’ practiced by capitalist nations, which creates a decentered individual with no roots in any organic community. The ‘democratic’ individual is ideologically bonded by Money, which—besides all the other ‘rights’ creates “the right to enjoyment”, the one “human right” demanded be Marquis de Sade during the French Revolution, which right the Revolution denied him.

The Marquis, nevertheless, insisted on ‘enjoyment’, by insisting that he could do what we know as ‘sadistic’ things with everybody who came his way. This is not to say that being a sadist is to inflict sexual cruelty and degradation on others, but only that this is the result when you or I consider every body as subject of our will. It does not take long to perceive that the post-Revolution substitution for this freedom is the presumptions granted to Money.

When the philosophers (Voltaire among them) began to argue for the separation of religion and state, they effectively succeed in overthrowing God by making Him (or Her) an object of pietism, rather than a force integral to community making and maintaining. With the arrival of the French Revolution and the separation of Church and State becoming a reality, God ceased to be the benevolent Creator of all, Who according to old community myths, out of his benevolence was willing to Sacrifice Him-Herself for the sake of the community. The result was a bonding of the community in a common dream of peace and friendship. But when God was replaced by Money, society enabled the rise of the God of Wealth as a substitute for humankind’s Primal God.

Unfortunately, the God of Wealth or Money depended on accumulation. Buying candy for a penny does not make one wealthy. However, accumulation could not be done without the word being turned into a paradox: causing creators to become killers. First the killing was of animals for the sake of their skin, which were used either as clothing, sandals or leggings, then carpets and wall hangings; but it did not take long before it was realized that moths like pelts even more than humans, and the killing of animals was made compulsory. This is how those with the authority to issue orders were soon discovered to have the advantages that those with no authority also desired. The latter quickly transformed authority into power. Whereas formerly people had submitted to power willingly because they respected the authority behind it, henceforth power lost its power of persuasion unless it increased the pain that came with it.

The system of taxation may have begun in the Kingdom of Khazaria , when the Vikings began to force the slav kings to pay bounty for the subjects the Vikings took hostage. The slav kings then, in turn, began to demand from their subjects, mostly herders of reindeer, a certain number of pelts, which evolved into taxation.

Whereas in early sacred communities authority had been acquired by imitating God and becoming a martyr for the sake of the community, the rise of power exchanged martyrdom for the illusion of immortality. Whereas the earlier King held authority by taking an oath to self-sacrifice himself at a predetermined time, he later came to use this authority to empower an executive to do ‘the dirty work’. The executive, originally a herder of the animals, necessarily became the butcher and skinner.

In the early days, when the community was still sacred, no one ever  killed an animal without asking it forgiveness. No doubt, the transition from being a wholesale butcher of deer to becoming a killer of the herdsman Abel was no an easy step, because even the butcher is likely to have objected to serial butchery of his brother’s flock and then his noncompliant brother. The sacred community, too, likely objected. This is how the first laws came to be written: Thou shall not revenge your animals on Cain, because if you do, vengeance will be taken on you sevenfold (Gn 4:15). Here the word ‘sevenfold’ is used in the sense that the King of Power will kill the cousins of the sacred villagers to the seventh remove. This will result in slaughter and war. We live in such days today.

When religion was separated from the state, it was Cain who became ‘the red man’ (also Cadmus, etc.), who broke lose from the authority of the sacred King and replaced him. Henceforth, the King became the Banker, aka Cashier-In-Chief (in recent Western history his name is closely associated with that of Rothchilds, who may be distant descendants of Kazar tax collectors working for Vikings collecting bounty for hostages from early Slav kings. Unfortunately, the powerlessness of the sacred community was such that this system was soon adopted by every Mideastern King and then by every state in the world.)

To escape the curses of organic man, the tax collectors eventually declared themselves to be ‘different’ (or ‘chosen’), that is, immortal, but unable to separate their origin from that human beings (the brahmans tried), and knowing the vengeful nature of humans, they declared all humans immortal. Still, the priviledge of holding on to most of the Money they kept for themselves, which enabled them to declare themselves Gods of Money. Idealistic as the tax collectors were, they could not like God The Wondermaker, create Money without end and for all humans in equal amounts (until the creation of the Federal Reserve—a private bank—which did so through the mechanism of so-called QE or Quantitative Easing). Even so, they could create enough Money for a select few by desertifying the planet, and persuading the naïve descendants of the dumbed down sacred community that they would be compensated by a free trip to a colony on the moon.

Following such maneuvers in word and deed, they now wait for the day the religious call ‘Judgment Day’, by arming themselves to the teeth and accustoming themselves to eating laboratory grown meat, aka soylent (ahem ‘cultured’) meat, because all the farm workers who grew greens were soon be dead for lack of Money.

From here on soylent meat will not only be seen in our accustomed McD, but will come in as many flavors as you can think of: lamb, steak, pork, chicken, rabbit, fish, and not least, human.

Eso’s Chronicles 193/ 3

Vikings Continued (3)
© Eso A.B.

The question of whence capitalism, is also a question of where to humankind? Even at the finish line of the demise of the Western economic system, capitalism does not appear to accept “learning from experience” as the answer, but chooses to “push the gas pedal to the floor” as the way of its reason.

The African proverb mentioned in the previous blog: “They are our enemies; we marry them”, appears the only choice that capitalism offers to those who not only disagree with them, but think of them as people who believe that being “killers” is the way of humankind.

Whence this stubborn determination to cannibalize the planet?

One possible answer is that it arises from an adventurous spirit and an inadvertent overstepping of human limitations. Such a situation may have arisen when animal herders (caribou, reindeer) in the area now known as Siberia, but anciently known as Tartary, failed to make a timely return south, and were trapped in the northern region and had to endure the winter there.

Those who survived the winter, could not return to their original homes, because their way was blocked by a sea (the Baltic), and they had no boats. The resolution to the problem was not a matter of a season or a year, but one of many years. When the herders finally had boats, they probably had also eaten the last of their reindeer and other game that was an easy catch. In short, by the time the herders discovered the solution, they had become fishermen, were destitute, desperate, and hungry.

At this point, they also had a bit of luck. The Baltic Sea in harsh winters could be crossed, but then again in milder winters it could not. The Baltic Sea is also known for having very shallow shorelines. The latter factor contributed to the fact that the Vikings built shallow boats that later proved as if made to order for navigating far up river of other countries. Since the herders and survivors were mostly men, their first use of the boats during the navigable season was to go in search of women.

Known as Vikings http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikings, the name these men originally called themselves was probably entirely something other. Nevertheless, the word closely parallels the English word ‘hiking’.  At the above link, under Etymology, we read that: “The word víking derives from the feminine vík, meaning ‘creek, inlet, small bay’”. If we shift our mind into paradolia mode, we can readily imagine ‘vik, creek, inlet, bay’ as words symbolic of female genitalia. Thus, to go viking or wading upriver may go back to the ancient custom of wife stealing or for the male to take for himself a woman through an act of rape.

However, when rape is no longer limited to the experience of one woman, but symbolizes the experience of many villages, the reaction to the violence of Viking raiders was not limited to a scream, but led to a series of earthshaking cultural changes. For example, what had been but herder’s switch or pole, metamorphosed into a sword and spear. When the ‘treasure house’, then the temple of the tribe, was robbed of its precious objects, the tribe felt that not only had it suffered a loss and humiliation, but its very being (a temple commemorates also one’s ancestors) had been attacked. Worse, the acquisition of a wife evolved into acquisition of slaves, even enslavement in situ, by taking the whole tribe prisoner and occupying lands that formerly had belonged to it.

Needless to say, going ‘viking’ put an end to subsistence economies and popularized enslavement and acquisitiveness. In due course this led to taxation (animal furs at first), which led to money and global dependency on  enslavement as a facilitator of human ‘development’.

One may go on to speculate that the word ‘capitalist’ derives from the name of the Capetian dynasty. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capetian_dynasty, which derives its name from (in words of the link): “…the Capets, which ruled the Kingdom of France from 987 to 1328, was the most senior line of the Capetian dynasty – itself a derivative dynasty from the Robertians.” Hmm: Robertians? The source for the word “robbers”? Another hmm: “bright fame”? Yes, contradictory, but not for paradolia. Robin Hood?

The sole opposition to this materialist trendline came from the sacred: the sensibility that life and consciousness is something special, a movement which unlike that of a river can chose a path of its own. This is perhaps why water was supplanted by the wind as a symbol for spirit and soul. No matter how ephemeral, the sacred was sufficient to empower the mind to discover (imagine) the story, that everything is sacred (the past, the present, the future, all nature and humankind itself) consequent to having been  created by a Creator or a Creatrix, who upon completing the act of creation had so exhausted themselves as to be thought of as sacrifices.  This act of sacrifice necessarily put an obligation to His-Her highest creation, humankind, to learn and be able to imitate it.

Apparently this obligation is so integrated in the very being of humankind that only extreme violence and brutality may succeed in repressing it. Because repeated violence is an onerous and brutalizing endeavor of Self, the materialist powers (the latter tribal leaders, barons, and princes) began a globalizing ‘reform’ movement.

Since the story about the sacrifice of the creator Gods disturbed the Vikings and Roberts, their agents made attacks on and questioned the authority of the Sacred King, whose role was to imitate the Creator Gods. The attacks were successful: the Sacred King (often of a young age and not ready to die) felt compelled to accept the Viking ways, thus losing authority in the eyes of the people.

In a remarkable book called “Communities of Violence”, Professor David Nirenberg, describes the agonizing process that led to the creation of capitalist society http://press.princeton.edu/titles/5827.html. Though none of the reviewers of the work that at I have read emphasize ‘capitalism’ or ‘taxation’, given a perspective that does not feel obliged to fall in line with historians of the academics of the West, I take the point of view that the book nicely describes the consequences of fiscals at an early stage of the capitalist economic phenomenon.

Indeed, the manipulation of the Creation story by the Franks rewrites the Basil Iahn/John story into what we now know as the story of King Jesus Christ, who contrary to the first named is accepting of tax collectors http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+19%3A1-10&version=NIV and an unrestrained ‘free market’.

 
Tibet socialist villages http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-23100427