Showing posts with label historians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label historians. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

EC 453 GoveRment is an aLien People
© Eso A.B.
Government, History, Truth Same Same
© Translation Eso A.B.


Western Civilization is impermeable. That is to say, it is a linear and perpetual false flag by virtue of its consequences, not only in one or a few instances (as in the Pearl Harbor and 9/11 events), but over centuries that extend over more than a thousand years. It serves the governments of our time, as witness the Ukraine events, which are nothing but a return of the so-called 4th Crusade of 1204 in 2014, a distance of 810 years).

As I have argued in these blogs, there is one major event that provoked the war of 1204: the imposition of taxation and its adoption (due to its success in creating governments of power) by (eventually) all governments. In short, no government was ever defeated by a Revolution, the latter purely a delusion created by delusional change.

Of course, this is not to say that the event(s) were apparitions from nowhere, but were preceded by a period of developments, the extent of which we do not know, because of the view disseminated by most historians that 1) acceptance taxation by governments is many times older than, say, a thousand years; 2) that the war of 1204 and periods before were not followed by revolts, which in effect chased from the area of the Black Sea and the deltas of the Dnieper and Volga  rivers to the delta of the Rhine (the Benelux) the Franks, who were descendants of Vikings and their like; and 3) historians are not wedded to the lies of government, which historians, neither of this or then time, dared to contradict); and 5) that in spite of evident reasons for their corruption historians are not bedfellows of governments.
                                                                                 
There are some exceptions. For example, the Swiss historian Daniele Ganser , who has written extensively on Gladio, the deep government run by NATO in post-WW2 Europe; the American historian Bernard Lewis who has written extensively on the 9/11 cover-up; and the Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko, who has studied early European history and found it to be a matter of chronologicl shifts of certain historical events by a method of literary displacements such as, for example, the events of the Iliad and Odyssey , both attributed to Homer (8th cent. BC), and  the Aeneid  by Virgil (1st cent. BC), the Bible, and more. The parallels between the overlapping histories are not insignificant, but point to the likelihood that one historical event was used to overwrite another.

This raises the question of whether the numerous chronological shifts discovered by Fomenko  have not become so habitual that our current history is the last in a series, or that current events are concluding events of the last of a series. If the latter, then it is likely to end as WW3 beginning either in the Baltics * or Ukraine (part of Byzantium and Homer’s event). At least one researcher (Vinci) includes the Baltic area in the map  of Homer.

What is disastrous about government and history being bedfellows is that it presents a homosexual state of being as a ‘natural’ state of being that NO religion has objected to. NO HISTORIAN has dared draw conclusions and point out the consequences of a prolonged period of not telling the truth and creating truth as a Para reality. For example, NO HISTORIAN ==as far as I know—has pointed out that ‘democracy’ is a system of government that is a direct result of history as a lie. NO HISTORIAN has pointed out that the modern environment is a consequence of Nature superseded by the Unnatural. NO HISTORIAN has pointed out that the only place where democracy exists in the long term is the wood. NO HISTORIAN has pointed out that our present history is accepted because to contradict it meets either with complete silence or the barrel of a gun, which amounts to about the same thing.

NO HISTORIAN has pointed out that the many times lauded separation of state and religion without elimination or radical circumscription of the power of the state to tax—leads the state to acquire for itself religious authority as well, which is where our civilization finds itself at this time.

* \.D||||  \.I||||  \.E|||| \.V||||  \.E||||  Ļ||||  \.I||||  x 47:  Sts. Devils x 47: One of the 47 ‘devils’ (a group of protestors—naming themselves after the famous 47 Japanese samurai (recruitment in effect) Antons Benjamins has announced a hunger strike in connection with the irresponsible actions of the Latvian government reflected in the absence of protests regarding the occupation of Latvia by NATO forces, which includes the stationing of nuclear capable aircraft. Russia has protested these actions by NATO as a threat to it and its citizens.

Because of incliment (cold) weather Mr. Benjamins is presently ill, which is why he is temporarily replacing the hunger strike with that of a fast as part of the Advent season. He is asking the citizens and ‘residents’ of Latvia, including the members of the Latvian Saeima, to join him in a prayer and a fast on behalf of the security of Latvia and its inhabitants.

Mr. Antons Benjamins (named after his grandfather) is the descendant of two well known editors of Latvia’s major newspaper (Jaunākās Ziņas—Latest News, 1911-1940). Janis Benjamins, the last editor in chief of the newspaper was arrested by the Sovied Cheka and was shot at Astrahan in 1942.

Mr. Benjamins (81) returned from living 46 years in the United States and has lived near twenty years in Latvia, near Burtnieku ezers, a well known lake in northern Latvia, in Braslavas precinct, where he occupies himself with writing, bloging,  and by helping needy neighbors in the tradition of his forebears Herrnhuters, now better known as the Moravian Church.

Friday, January 10, 2014

Eso’s Chronicles 274 / 14
34—Deaded Historians
© Eso A.B.
All comments appearing within brackets [ ] are editorial in origin.

All those who support globalization do not support nationalism, or community solidarity. The latter is a different animal. “Globalization” is of course the most recent name for the virus that was to become the bubonic plague of the post-America world order, also known as NWO or New World Order.

There are many theories of how the word came into being. Some claim that it was hatched by the Bilderberg group. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10102168/Bilderberg-Group-No-conspiracy-just-the-most-influential-group-in-the-world.html  Yet others say that it was from the Free Masons, a group that began in Britain and preceeded the Bilderbergs by centuries http://www.amazon.com/Builders-Empire-Freemasons-Imperialism-1717-1927/dp/0807830887 and made significant contributions to the process of building empires. As the building of empires proved successful for some, others, too, jumped aboard and added to the hymn that  began with the words: “The bigger the better”, words—“…is more the better.”

But with that the Freemasons encountered troubles. The world was not big enough to hold all who wanted to be bigger, and this is where the next revolution began: the words ‘bigger’ and ‘more’ were exchanged for words such as: One World, The New World Order, The Free World, A Democratic World, and last, but not least, Globalization. At this point everyone knew that the Moove-ment toward Globalization began in Europe sometime long ago, and that it remains to this today closely associated with what the writer Hemingway once called the “haves”—people who always want to have more and bigger things.

The first ‘haves’ ever were of course princes or children of Kings, who had slain their father, who had been King, and who for that reason had it ALL, but never thought of it as a toy. One of the oldest European myths about Uranus tells that the Olympic Gods of the Greeks actually came into being after years of contesting for power with their father http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa011398.htm. The same myth is reflected in the English story of how the English Barons won the Magna Harta (1215) from King John, who they did not kill, but tortured long and painfully (this part of the story has been deliberately lost) until the old King gave up his power for a retirement income http://minbaralhurriyya.org/h/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/qu-est-ce-que-le-liberalisme-classique_pic.jpg . Notice the clubs in the hands of the barons (one in front of and another behind the King) and the unidentified mob of military men surrounding the tent. Proclaimed as a Great Document of Liberty, the Magna Harta, the document that King John signed, the document was not actually such. It did become such, for a little more than a century, following the rise of the Age of Enlightenment and after the Industrial Age had caused havoc eliminating all the independent weavers of the countryside and moved them to live in the city slums. At the time of signing, the Magna Harta was a document of any meaning only for the barons.

However, as I note through out my blogs, the rise of ‘democracy’ as a welcome political system may be viewed as such only while the situation of the lands (America, not Europe) was such that it was for anyone’s taking, and jobs were plenty and the pay good. When one was up against a dead-end on the east coast of America, one could steal a horse from a farmer and keep riding West until one came to California and found a creek at the bottom of which lay gold.

Today, with the environment polluted, the oceans irradiated from nuclear power stations spilling radiation, and desk top machines that will make anything but a brain one can trust, ‘democracy’ again serves only a few, some say no more than 0.01% of the total population.

This is why more and more people are looking for a history that explains in greater detail why what is falling into the sea are mostly hot air balloons? Why is it that the hot air has cooled so suddenly? Why with all that fiat money being pumped into the ‘system’, the system will not refloat? Why is it that we must again learn that wet money is not something a supermarket cashier will accept gladly, but will ask you for a card that you don’t have, because according to the government, you are but a subjective mind, a hubris, one full of yourself, and not objective as you ought to be, according to which you are but a deaded bling?

So what about history?

Why do we have to listen to the historians lie (like chickens that have their beaks pressed to the white line laid by government) that democracy began in ancient Athens, when it was in existence for many thousands of years before in the wood?

Why are we not told by historians that the first taxes were extorted from people who survived off grazing animals and the milk buffalo cows and mares gave?

Why are anthropologists not telling that humans were not hunters (but only root gatherers and herders) until the barons started levying them with pelt taxes, which forced our forebears to drive their beloved herds off steep cliffs en masse?

Why are historians not telling that there was no such thing as agriculture, until the barons figured out that they could collect from agriculturalists more in taxes than animal herders?

Why do we not hear that slavery did not exist when we lived in the wood, but began only with the arrival of ‘agriculture’?

Why are we not told that the polluters of the environment are urban centers built and developed by 0.01% of the population? Would not the Earth return to wood if we eliminate the deserts that are cities?

Why are we not told that our ‘primitive’ forebears had a better economic system than the Ponzi scheme set up under the Federal Reserve?