King
Cain
The Story Of Pre-Calendar Christianity
By © Eso Anton Vendamenc, 2019
27 REVENGE OF THE
DRAGON
Why
is the ancestry of King Cadmus important for the story of Oedipus and his
family?
The
story of King Cadmus, when explored through all its pathways, reveals the real
cause for the psychogenetic conflict between the twins. Unfortunately, a
uroborotic orientation among academic experts in our time, leaves the pathways
of the story unexplored.
The
cause of the conflict between the twin brothers harks back to the slaying of
the Dragon or Serpent Who is the guardian of the Well of Life, which belongs to
Artemis, the Mother of Nature. The well was to be the source of water for the
City of Tehves (Fathers-Thebes), which Cadmus is in the process of founding.
The
slaying of the Guardian of the Well is another version of the Sumerian story of
how Gilgamesh (the secular human) slays Humbaba-Humwawa*, the Guardian of the
holy cedars of Lebanon. In retaliation for the death of Humwawa, the Sumerian
God Enlil slays Gilgamesh’s companion Enkidu.
*Humbaba-Humwawa
is a version of the story the English know
under the legend of the ‘Green Man’. The Green Man was slain by the Catholic
Church, which remade him into a decoration for the columns that support the rooves
of its medieval churches. A hundred years ago, the Green Man became reanimate
again at the Midsummer Festivals of the newly founded (1918) state of Latvia,
where he was known by the name of Yahnis- the herder. Following World War Two,
Latvian communal bonds had become so shreded by the butchering city princes of
Europe as to again disappear from sight. Significantly, he was replaced by a
newly created figure of a violent national hero known by the name of Bear-Jawbreaker, a minor figure borrowed
from a minor fairy-tale. To accommodate secularist forces Latvia’s major
literary figure Rainis seconded the choice,and instead of Yahnis, a traditional
hero since ages ago, the nation came to be represented by a puppet.
As
the myth about Cadmus and Tehves grows more sophisticated, it nevertheless
respects the myth’s original intent snd leaves the twins to kill each other as
the original intends it to ptrdict.
In
Sophocle’s version of the story, as told in the play “Oedipus at Colonnus”, Oedipus comes to the Holy Grove of Colonnus
for no other reason than to die. At the grove, where he is met by his daughter
Ismene, Oedipus learns that his twin sons are engaged in a deadly duel with each
other. Though the play does not tell that Oedipus dies to prevent his sons from
killing each other, if we interpret the play from a pareidolic rather than
linear thought perspective (Oedipus is, after all, born of the womb of queens
Iocaste and Merope), such a purpose for his visit to the grove is an inevitable conclusioun.
To
understand the meaning of the Oedipus cycle of plays by Sophocles, one must
have an understanding of their origin in the myth-sacrament about the
government of the the self-sacrificial Sacred King. Unfortunately the
Aristotelian fairytale and myth of city led Democracy contradicts leadership by
example and sacrifice.
The
horror of the murder of Abel, the
guardian of the wild Paradise, does not occur to Cain* until God marks him with a sign that says: If you do not wish MotherNature to kill you, do not kill the killer
because he, too, is her son.
*Cain
of course ia but a name behind which stands no prtson or individual, but a
school of thought that favors the replacement of Paradise with a City. The 20th
century is a monument to its ‘fathered’
cities, while the 21st is its ‘mothering’ consequence.
A
city-bred mind cannot imagine a death defying man of the wood other than a dead
God propped up as a dictatorial bureaucracy. Instead of a God-King sacrificing
Himself on behalf of a community to prevent it from dying into its dead self,
the city turns into a citadel of porn and has children twisting their pelvises dancing
bebop.
28 DEADLY PRINT
The
invention of print arrived with the transformation of a village by the
riverside into a polis* or city. Because the city is an artifice that serves a
powerful and wealthy few, the princes of the city were in need to destroy the
persuasions of the many who were forced to come to the city from the wood. The
many were informed as to the meaning of life by stories the truth which was self-evident
anf had segued into from Nature about them.
*Because
according to Grimm’s Law the consonant P
converts to F, it is likely that the
word ‘polis’ was originally pronounced as ‘folis’ or ‘filis’ in an attempt to
make the people of the wood believes the city to be more friendly to the wood than
its violence proved.
There
is no better way of destroying thought as a reflection of reality than create stories
that encourage and project uncontrolled fantasy, then declare the fantasies (by
way of setting them in print) to be of ‘ancient origin’. The lies about ancient
origins were even more powered up by declaring them ‘holy’, storing them at the
Vatican library, burning down the ‘old’ library in Alexandria, and blaming it
on Muslims.
What
the Bible in the Vatican library does not tell us is that King Cain’s father
Adam was born of Eve, and that after Eve bore Adam, she married and copulated
with him, then bore them Cain and Abel.
Instead
the Bible tells us that Eve was created of Adam’s rib, a surreal visualization that
outdoes even Salvator Dali. Because there is no story book called ‘Vivre’
(another way of spelling ‘Bible’), millions of people have come to think that
the biblical version is the only story about Adam and Eve that ever was.
Luckily, the Vivre version was preserved by the Greek playwright Sophocles.
The
Greek version would still prevail today if the Jews, neo Christians, and Muslims
had not replaced parthenogenesis with agrogenesis. Agrogenesis is a word that
exists because it was not in the
interest of the ‘Abrahamic religions’ (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) to
admit that Eve came into the world before Adam. Indeed, neither parthenogenesis
nor agrogenesis is mentioned by the ‘frozen’ books of any of the three
religions, because all replaced Eve with the Egyptian God Atum (Adam), who created
the world of his seed while Eve (Ise-Isis) was nowhere about. The omission and
dismissal of Eve accelerated the arrival of a world dominated by solely a male
priesthood, which by printing and burning books, avoided the notion that it
could ever be challenged.
The
reason why parthenogenesis is superior to agrogenesis is because it creates beings
grounded in the womb of nature, and Nature gives the ova a womb for incubation.
The reason why agrogenesis is inferior to parthogenesis is because it is limited
to mental creativity removed from Nature, and the brain has presumed to replace
the womb.
The
reason why parthenogenesis interrupts itself after only one generation is that
it is a process initiated by an invisible being and Eve is its halfway house. The
halfway house interrupts itself once the female ‘sees’ that she has given birth
to beings other than herself. The ‘seeing’ transforms itself into a ‘feeling’. For
the female, her children always remain her
children; the father of the children plays a secondary role even if in human
society the secondary role is no less important than the first.
The
problem with the Biblical version of the story of Cain is that it presumes and
assigns to Nowhere (a land without Being and consciousness) the function of God.
The Bible fails to understand (as more ancient myths did) that God has to be
created through sacrifice by Being of him or herself; and that Self-sacrifice
is the ultimate deed of Being. The Big Bang (the coming into being of the Material
Universe) continues after it cools through the creation of Consciousness in an
expansion that began some 12 billion light years ago.
Just
as women born of a religion dominated by God fail to understand that that their
forebears thought of themselves as being born of Materia, so an age that denies
myth fails to understand that King Cain—like King Cadmus—had sons who were born
twins. The failure to understand is due to ‘artificial intelligence’, which is fostered
by a city environment divorced from Nature. Which is to say, to survive in the
city without making war on Nature is impossible.
Identical
twins of the same sex symbolize unrealized genderconsciousness, hence the
likelihood of such twins killing each other in order to eliminate competition
and, be thatasit may, rescue Nature. When a farmer kills his herder brother, as
Cain does, he unwittingly sets his misdeed aright by fostering a cause for the birth
of another set of twins (in body or mind). Both will be born with the face of
the same euroborotic monster—that of Kirtimukha*
or Nature that has notyet lost its Godhead.
No comments:
Post a Comment