EC 698 @ http://esoschronicles.blogspot.com/

King Cain

The Story Of Pre-Calendar Christianity

By © Es^o Anton Vendamenc, 2019

23 WHY DID GOD COME INTO BEING?

Why is it that God is said to have favored the sacrifice of Abel over that of Cain?

Is it because God preferred that man and woman be of the wood as Abel was, or is it because Cain was a farmer (Genesis 4:1–16) and, thus, necessarily a slave who—on orders of the landlord—had deforested the land to raise fruit and grain for the people who the landlord maintained in the city?

Did God know that if left to his own devices, Cain will be the one who in the near future will imagine himself going to the Moon, while Abel will remain happily in the forest listen to the birds, keep a garden with a wild apple tree, plant a perennial rhubarb plant, and climb for honey with the bears?

According to the story in the Bible, God did not create Adam and Eve so they would become farmers and become enslaved to the city and the artificial intelligence of its coo-coo clocks.

There is no evidence that human beings were to replace the unwritten democratic laws of the wood with democratic laws concocted by minds gone haywire from living in the city.

Why and how did the first king come into being? What was the need that created him?

Was the king in answer to the deed of Cain that caused him to slay Abel, yet immediately regret what had happened? Is a king the result of an act of regret and contrition, because he would cause others to desist from similar outbursts of violence?

Indeed there was and is such an act: God must die.

Because there is no God Who man has ever seen, man must take the place of God, and make God come alive through a death that causes awe among those who benefited by the death o God that yet brought Him alive.

In our time, we are witnesses to cynicism of which most of us are partakers. As indicated in Ch11, city born youths, who live in an environment disconnected from Nature and untampered with history, grow increasingly hysterical and violent as the city becomes dominant over Nature. Fake idealism drives ‘democratic’ governments to hysterical verbal ejaculations (re: ‘the deplorables’) among who elected them. People forget they live among unsustainable presumtions.

Similar hysterics occurred when humankind was first driven from the wood. Instead of seeing behind a curtain of trees and leaves the sky as one was accustomed to do, one had to watch a black desert in which the stars are seen not as apples in grass, but as lifeless sea shells.

Early humans found ways to enliven the night in the sky. This is why the zodiac has so many Gods and Goddesses, why astrologers continue to see a ‘fortune’ the sky, and why astronomy resmains a tale about an etherized frog.

Today’s human beings—having been delivered of the simplicity amd naiveté that was a blessing of the wood—are not satisfied with the answers provided by the Gods of the re-animists. Today’s human crave a God, Who will prove to them that He-She really exists to the naked eye, else Death is everywhere and God carries a rainbow colored flag at the next tranny parade. How is a once-upon-a-time God reattached to a dying animal to reinvent and prove Himself? The minds of shamans everywhere are stressed to find the answer.

Indeed that is why Eve brought Adam into being, and how then God created Himself by dying into Himself.

24 THE FAILURE OF THE GLOBALIST ANSWER

There are several unspoken prejudices that are entertained by Globalist Theology.

One such prejudice is that God does not need to prove to humankind His existence, because He has been replaced by the Globalist State and its talking heads.

The nature of the State was accurately pictured at the beginning of the 19^th century by the Spanish painter Goya in a painting called “Saturn Devouring His Son”, 1819-1823. Goya, 73 years old when he did the painting, painted Saturn directly onto a wall of his farm house. His message was that Man had replaced God with a Monster. This was sixty years before Nietzsche was to make his well-known “Gott ist tot” (God is dead) observation.

To this day, most critiques of Nietzsche try tell the student that Nietzsche was a nihilist, rather than a man sick to his soul of our civilization.

Another prejudice is that God is a supernatural Being and therefore cannot be known by humans unless He chooses to reveal himself at some unexpected moment. The prejudice is in line with Saturn revealing himself to his son only when the son’s head is already between his teeth. A young soldier, who joins the military in peace time, fits the bill when war comes ands he is sent to the front.

A third prejudice is of the Pope, a self-appointed ‘infallible’ intermediary between a God unaccountable for his deeds (creation) and humankind. It is widely known that up to recently the Vatican let its cardinals explain to choir boys that visions of Heaven are brought by orgasms in the vestry through the intermediacy of a priest.

The sexual nature of most prejudices associated with religion attests that so-called paganism was a religion based on the act of birth going back to the animal kingdom. For pagans, who were people of the wood, government, as we know government today, was not necessary. Religion had nothing to do with death or God. As pointed out in Ch 22 God was created by Man when the city was created and there arose a need for one who would sacrifice himself so others would live in peace.

There is only one catch to the religion that worships God: as soon as it fails to generate awe (by a man dying to become reborn as God), the priests of its institutions become preoccupied with sex. Unfortunately, sex in the city differs radically from sex in nature: it has little to do with birth, because it has become a masturbatory fantasy. Such a fantasy is being taught in the kindergartens.

A Victorian age for transsexuals is in the offing. Unlike the Victorian age of the 19^th century and its ‘allegedly’ strict moral standards, this one will distinguish itself with an inversion and have school lockers large enough for get acquainted ‘fuck space’ for children.

Not everyone agrees that this will come to pass, because life on planet Earth remains heir to flesh. It follows, some argue, that Armageddon will be the result of a fatal flaw (absence of life) in the mechanisms constructed by Enlightened (Godless) men of Autonomous Artificial Intelligences that go “poof” in the night.

Armageddon has its source in the hysterics of pretentious Enlightenment come to unenlightenment and an inevitable catharsis of disappointment.

Like the story about the ‘mad’ philosopher Nietzsche, who is said to have witnessed the flogging of a mare in Turin (some say the story is not true, but was created by Dostoevsky for his novel Crime and Punishment), Death of God in the 21^st century is no longer understood to be a supernatural or out of body phenomenon, but an out of mind event.

Unlike the Theology of Cain, which accepts guilt as inevitable and the existence of God as open to doubt as no less inevitable (both phenomenon are a byproduct of consciousness), Globalist theologians do not explain their behavior as God inspired, but leave their behavior be massive evidence of disconnection from reality?*

*The last truly Christian effort at creating a just world was that of the Moravians, aka the Moravian Church. The Moravians, descendants of the Jan Hus movement, were defeated by the neutered Christians, who inherited religion in the world that followed the Westphalian Peace treaty. The treaty not only ended the Religious Wars, but issued a death sentence against God snf humankind as known up to that time. Needless to say, the cause of the Religious Wars in our time is ridiculed, even though it resulted in the pseudo religious communist cum Bolshevik movement in Russia and Eastern Europe and is belatedly manifest in the ‘snow flake’ movement in America.

All who have studied the history of Christianity under the rule of the Catholic King Jesus, ought to know that the murder of John the Baptist on the shores of the Jordan River, is a murder committed by Jesus manipulated the Globalist puppeteers of words. The fact that the murder of John goes unacknowledged indicates that the murderer is not Jesus, but a theological doctrine that serves some ulterior motive. If the murderer had been Jesus, he would have confessed himself to be an identical twin of Cain. If hanging Himself to Himself* were but an act of atonement for his sins, Jesis would have been a spiritual cousin of the Norse God Odin. Those who learned of his death would have resolved to die in the manner similar to his way of death. Indeed, this is what the Religious Wars were about. Alas! Globalist theologians, preferring the Last Supper served up as a socialist smorgasbord make no mention of life on Earth under their umbrage as a tragedy.

*There is no evidence that Jesus could not have escaped—if he had wished to—by the Gethsemane garden route. Indeed, the Last Supper is evidence that Jesus was preparing himself to die, and went to Gethsemane to receive the kiss of Judas, not to pray. Judas is, of course, Jesus’s own inner self telling him: “What you are going to do, do it quickly.” Judas is Jesus’s Witness to Himself. When Peter draws his sword and cuts off the ear of Malchus, it is not in defense of Jesus, but to betray the true meaning of what Jesus, Odin, Cain were trying to accomplish through their self-sacrifice: Without God as Spirit humankind cannot survive.

All protestations and denials of violence by the clergy to the contrary, Globalist Theology remains a political doctrine on behalf of secular power and government.