How They Shut Down Populist
Latvijans
By © E. Antons
Benjamiņš, 2017
A
countryside Populist is employed by Nature all day long; an urban Populist chokes
and enslaves Nature until it dies.
8 The Last Days Of
A Populist Household
(Part 1)
The year is 1941. Word came from the city by telephone (I do not know from what city, but possibly
from my maternal grandmother, possibly paternal aunt, both of Riga) to prepare
to be deported. Flight was not advised. If we try to flee, the farm can be
burned down, perhaps people will be killed. We are to pack and wait for the
arrival of the truck that will take us to the Jacobstown railroad station.
So, mother packed several
suitcases and flour sacks full with whatever she believed was necessary to
survive in Siberia. Father had already been sent there from Riga a day before. Maybe
this is what informed our informers and what informed mother that we were on
the list, too. Father’s crime was that at the age of twenty-five, at the time
of the Russian Revolution, he had been a supporter of the tsar, and his
loyalties instead of turning to the reds had turned to the whites. A Cheka
officer is said to have called him General Kolchak’s
denchic, which word stands for ‘servant’. Mother had an idea what Siberia would
be like from her childhood days spent east of the Urals and then in
Krasnoyarsk, where at nine years of age, separated from her mother and nearly
frozen to death, a railroad switchman’s family gave her and her siblings
shelter.
We packed our suitcases
and sat on them and waited. I do not remember whether we sat the entire day or
just a few minutes. I was only eight years old at the time. But the truck did
not come that day, and the following day the highway, which we could see from the
window of our room on the second floor of the farmhouse, was clogged with an
endless caravan of refugees and Russian military units. Something was going on.
Someone said that we were saved, because war had begun.
But one knew for sure. During
the day mother stayed in the house and told her children to do the same. We
children moved from our room to downstairs to the back of the house, and went
to play in the carpenter’s room. The room was just to the right of the common
room, where there was the big bread oven and in late fall and winter the loom
and spinning wheel stood by the back window. Our aunt boiled some eggs, and we
were to crumble the eggs and feed them to the chicks that were, for the time
being, kept in a small pen in the room. It was early afternoon. The sun was
high in the sky.
Then we heard an airplane.
I remember sitting on the floor of the work room at the time and pecking with
my finger on the floor, and calling: “Here chick, chick!” The chickens were
running between my hands, but I got up off the floor and ran to the window to
look at the plane. It was flying rather low in what appeared to be a loop, and
was about to disappear behind the north end of the house. Just as it
disappeared, there occurred I knew not what. The entire house shook and swung
from left to right as if it were a sailboat. All the windows shattered and fell
out of the window frames. Explosions swallowed what had been a quiet scene on a
farmhouse floor but seconds before.
This is how I remember the
first day of World War 2. That was seventy-six years ago.
It is not the only
adventure that I remember of those days. After the bombs fell (we later counted
43 craters as wide across as the big kitchen table and deep enough to hide a
grown man standing) we gathered up the glass and the women covered the windows with
sheets, rugs, and what ever. My uncle, the farmer, and his brother, a retired
sailor from England’s merchant marine, drove all the cattle (25), sheep (35),
pigs (10), and horses (12), altogether over eighty heads of farm animals, into
the wood. The only animals that remained on the farm were the cats (2), dogs
(2), rooster and chickens (some dozen), and Brunis, the stallion who was stud
for fillies for many miles around.
Brunis not only has his
own story, but can connect to stories about much more. He causes me to recall
my grandfather, both of my grandmothers, aunt Emma, the owner of the farm, and
all kinds of things, including the fact that today nothing remains of the farm.
It caught fire from a cigarette negligently discarded by those abandoned by the
shock that introduced a ‘renewed’ Latvija (1991). A kindly man from the future and
another country, who purchased the land, has now bulldozed the remains of
Soklēni into the ground—for a plow to better level it to the level of a field
of what is now Never-was-everland.
Another story that the remembering
Brunis brings to mind is the founding of Latvija, in 1918. This was fifteen
years before I was born.
By my birthday (four years
after the 1929 stock market crash in America) the democratic and city oriented
Latvijan government (working in mindless concert with our times) had managed to
nearly destroy the country’s economy. The country was rescued from total ruin
by an agronomist, who many years before Latvija’s independence had visited the
United States of America and made acquaintance with how things were done in the
state of Nebraska and Texas.* After taking the reigns of the Latvijan government
into his hands, K.
Ulmanis strengthened government support of the peasants.** Unfortunately,
the American Civil War was long over, and Americans had turned from
self-sufficient Populists of the countryside into a virtual people of the city,
who were so to speak ‘into’ crude and snake oil. The age of the ‘quick buck’
was on its way with a gallop, and so was the 1929 Crash. For all his good
intentions, Ulmanis’s coup was part of events in a time given over to human
engineers.*** Full scale engineering of society began with the philosopher Locke. While
Locke is thought of as one of the main philosophers of the age of
Enlightenment, it is interesting that he came along in an age when cities had
gained an incontrovertible ascendancy over the countryside.
*Given
that history in the state of Latvija is grossly (but understandably) neglected
by those in political power and its historians are among the most timid
academians, Ulmanis biography is incomplete and leaves much to be researched
and explained. One question: How come when most of Livonian native people lived
in conditions of poverty, he came from a well to do farmer’s family. Where did
he get the money to purchase a ‘dairy business’ in Texas?
**While
Ulmanis is credited with establishing the Latvijan Farmers’s Party, the
question remains why it was the Bolsheviks who first had the greatest support
of the peasantry and volunteer soldiery. Ulmanis gained support of the farmers
only after the Bolsheviks shot themselves in the foot by transferring their
support from Populist peasantry to Populist workers in the virtual space of the
city.
***Locke’s
ideas about private property immensenly strengthened the power of the city
managers and everyone in position of power. Locke may be called the father of
all who make a living by speculation, i.e. he is theoriginator of the ideology
that caused the 1929, 2008, and presently (2017) economic catastrophies.
K. Ulmanis returned to Latvija
and was present at the founding of Latvija in 1918, and thereafter headed the
country’s provisional
government. However, after the 1922 general
elections, and after my de
facto Godfather* became the country’s First
President (1922-27), the country began a rickety passage (13
changes of government in a decade) through the 20th century tunnel
of semi-virtual and city dominated nationhoods.
*This
is a complicated aspect of my biography. I discuss it at greater length in a
previous book of this series. The First Latvian President’s son, who was a
justice of the Latvian Supreme Court (Senats), was my de jure godfather. The unusual arrangement was the result of intra-family
politics from both paternal and maternal side. On the paternal side: my
father’s youngest sister became the wife of my de jure godfather; on the maternal side: my grandfather was
ambassador to Moscow during President Chakste’s time in office, and had
frequent contacts with him. Because of the Latvijan government’s ‘deep
background’ connection with entante governments,
the Latvijan Foreign Ministry was hostile to its Moscow ambassador and fired
him as soon as President Chakste died (1927). To reestablish the links broken
by my father’s late marriage (I was born six years after the First President’s
death), the son of the late President was chosen to become my de jure godfather. Once when during the middle of WW2, I asked him whether he
could tell me who God was (I had heard that word mentioned all too many times),
the judge responded by saying “You will know that when you grow up”. He could
hardly have expected that I would take that as a directive to pursue the
question for the rest of my life. Though I surely do not know who God is yet, I
do know that He is of Populists of the countryside.
No comments:
Post a Comment