EC 688@ http://esoschronicles.blogspot.com/

King Cain

A Short and Never Before Heard History of King and God

By © Es^o Anton Vendamenc, 2019

5 THE FALSIICATION

OF HISTORY

Those of us who are of or before the 21^st century are witnesses to historical events that are retold by political forces in a manner that results in a falsification of what really happened when said historical event(s) took place. This is known as replacement of a Real event with a reimagined or false event.

Here are a couple of examples.

The opening scene to the 21^st century begins with the pulverization of two New York City skyscrapers at the so-called World Trade Center, by means of several nuclear mini-devices. A nearby third building, known as Building 7, with over 300,000 square feet occupied by government offices (including those of the Central Intelligence Agency), too, may have been brought down by a similar device. The reason for the demolition of Building 7 was because its basement was the source of the underground tunnels by which nuclear devices were delivered to the two World Trade towers. The reason for ‘pulling’ the Twin Towers is to be looked for in a coincidence of government and private interests, the latter due to losses incurred by a failing business, which losses could be recouped by collecting insurance money.

The above scenario is vehemently denied, and its proponents are described as conspiracy theorists.

There are a number of ‘conspiracy’ theories as to why and how the inner core of the government of the United States engineered and permitted others to engineer the so-called 9/11 event. To this author’s mind, the most plausible of theories argues that the American government on behalf of American upper class wished to panic the American people so it could legislate certain laws that would give the government increased power over the people it was entrusted to govern through ‘democratic’ elections.

46% of Americans have doubts about the conclusions of the official investigation of the 9/11 event in 2001. Almost two decades after the tragedy (2606 killed during the collapse of the twin towers and many more dead in subsequent years due to radiation), there is no official acknowledgement that the collapse was due to other than “uncontrolled fire” caused by airplanes said to have flown into the towers, but which left no airplane parts that could be found on the ground in the aftermath.

An equal number disbelieve the government version about the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963.

Other shocking government lies make rounds even as this story is written.

Take the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, one Mohammad Bin Salmen, who denies responsibility for (according to a unanimous vote by the U.S. Senate in the affirmative) the murder of a Saudi Arabian journalist working for an American newspaper (The Washington Post). The murder occurred in the Saudi embassy in Turkey. The victim, a familiar within the Saudi government elite, was acting as journalist. Apparently the position made him a threat to the Saudi government.

It is taken for granted that the Saudi crown prince and his henchmen are doing everything (including denials, lies, and payoffs) to dissappear the story. The Turkish Prime Minister traces the murder to the ‘highest’ circles of the Saudi government, but desists including among the ‘highest’ circles the Saudi Prince. Such are the diplomatic ‘pleasantries’, which over a time become lies.

The examples serve as an introduction to the greatest of historical cover-up stories ever—the murder (by nominalization) of the individual who became known as Jesus Christ. The murderer was the Byzantine Emperor Alexis I. The lie about what happened was told by his daughter, Princess Anna Comnena.

In this author’s version, the victim was not called Jesus but Basil, which name also means King.

6 HOW PARADISE

WAS DESTROYED

The suggestion that Jesus was not born in Bethlehem, but in Betelheim appears to contradict the author’s assertion made in the ‘Introduction’ that “the existence of God, is innate to humanity born of the wood...”.

In effect, Bethlehem is the name of a town heretofore associated with an alleged supernatural event, while Betleheim is likely to have been a commercial center with all the psychological stresses such places have in common. This is why Jesus was not in Betelheim to be born, but rather as a carpenter or healer.

While Jesus is said to have been a carpenter, he is never shown to have actually engaged himself in such work. Therefore, it is a greater likelihood that Jesus was in Betelheim as a healer of psychopaths (ruthless and aggressive tax collectors) whose problems were not solved by chewing the betel leaf alone.

The story that certain magi brought Jesus’s gifts of betel leaves, frankincense, and myrrh, indicates that Betelheim may have been near the Silk Road or one of its branches that wended their way from China and India to the West.

India and further east (Sri Lanka and other islands and peninsulas) are places were betel leaves are grown to this day. Because of their healing qualities, the leaves were then and remain today welcome gifts.

It is probable that the betel leaf has a role in human affairs that goes back to times before Jesus. Possibly the story goes back to ancient Mesopotamia and the Sumerian city state of Uruk, the source of the famous epic of Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh is said to have been king of Uruk.

In the course of the epic, Gilgamesh befriends a wild man named Enkidu, who joins him on a journey to the sacred cedar forest (the abode of Gods), which is guarded by the ‘monster’ Humbaba/ Humwawa and a sacred bull (?auroch, bison). Humwawa is said to have been raised by the Sun, that is to say, he is a man of the outdoors. Gilgamesh and Enkidu slay Humwawa and the sacred bull. The 50 men who are Gilgamesh’s body guards then cut down the cedars and otherwise destroy the forest. The Goddess Iananna (aka Ishtar) then slays Enkidu. Why Gilgamesh is spared is not clear, but it may have something to do with his high social status in the eyes of the writers of the epic.

Just before Gilgamesh slays Humwawa, the king tricks Humwawa in surrendering to him his most treasured possessions or ‘auras’, also called ‘terrors’. While the nature of these ‘auras’ is not described, they are likely to have been natural phenomena such as wind, rain, thunder, draught, earthquakes, plagues, and tides

Gilgamesh persuades Humwawa to surrender the auras by offering him seven gifts in return. The first gift is his sisters (old and young); the name of the second gift is lost; the third gift is flour; the fourth is shoes; and so on.

The name of the second or lost gift may not have been lost due to erasure by time or an accidental erasure of it on the clay tablet, but may have been deliberately chiseled from the tablet by those who came upon it in the 19^th century or our era. This is a time when Catholic theology still exercises a strong sway among Western academics.

Why was the name of the second gift scratched? Knowing the ‘Christian’ prejudices of our days, an intelligent guess would be that it was a sack of betel leaves.

Why were betel leaves replaced by gold?

Today’s scholars fail to recognize the similarities of the Epic of Gilgamesh with that of the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. Both are stories of a war between city dwellers and those who live in the forest, riverside, field, and mountains.

Gilgamesh, not Humwawa is the beast come to destroy.