EC 616 at http://esoschronicles.blogspot.com/

The Amazingly Slow Death of Populist Latvijans

By © E. Antons Benjamiņš, 2017

A definition of ‘communism’ begins from the premise that it ‘is the state of Nature-born human being from the time human beings began until now.

5 Of Events That Newer Were

(Part II)

Though the Russian Revolution of 1917 brought to the fore a factory class, which the elites were creating to serve it as marionettes, the failure of intellectuals to prevent the enslavement of humankind to the sticky pornographics of capitalism, and failure to identify the true causes of human misery in our time, created a tragedy that is not yet resolved. No resolution is likely until humankind realizes that ‘consciousness’ it claims to be its crowning glory is far from being conscious. Who can assure that the virtual reality of cities can be endured for longer than three or so centuries? Today we live this intolerable reality with a vengeance: even yesterday the Polish government confirmed that it will destroy the last vestige of nature in ancient Europe and proceed with its operations of deforesting the prehistoric Biaļowieža Forest. Who would have thought that the opposition of the Populists of Nature would turn out to be the virtuous Aliens of Virtualist cities?

The centuries of repression endured by the descendants of the Dniepr Balts have resulted in a handful of post-Baltic societies in which intellectuals have been out of touch with reality for so long that they cannot conceive of community as a phenomena of Nature, but perceive it as a whim of imperialist violence, coercive law, and individuals in possession of mobile telephones.

It not that the city-zens of Gdansk, Warsaw, and other Polish cities infected by the virus of virtualism and freed of guilt by neo-Christianity and capitalist production capacity, are the only ones to dismiss Nature as a fake egalitarian phenomenon and indulge in cutesy ideas about how to ‘screw up’ life on Earth and go found ‘democratic’ colonies on Mars. In Latvija, the Virtual virus (of instability) was planted into its body politic at its foundation as a sovereign nation. There occured many events that were analogous with events at the time of the founding of Finland. What is unique about Latvija is that its founding never had a public ceremony, but that such a ceremony is only be pretended to have happened. An interesting story that*: a piece of the shreds made of humankind fated to be caught in the space between by the West and the East.

*The one photograph that is said to prove that a ceremony of Latvija’s founding occurred, has been ‘legitimized’ by fake assertions by the ‘renewed’ and fake post-soviet Latvijan government. During the first two decades of Latvijan independence (which included the K. Ulmanis regime, 1933-1940) the photograph was part of a storefront display in Rīga. Though reproduced in history books, the picture never was accorded the status of a relic in a museum. After being hid in a cellar during WW2 and the Soviet times, the photograph came to prominence some seventy years (about 1988) after Latvija’s founding, when, crazed by Virtualist propaganda and promised consumerist goodies without having to stand in line for them, became worried that there may not be physical evidence that a founding ceremony occured. The absence of such could ruin the post-Soviet governments plans to celebrate the one hundredth anniversary of Latvia (in 2018) as its own. Well, the cceremony pictured in the photograph more likely occurred in Libau-Liepāja. a harbor city that acted as a base for a British naval squadron.

The real story of the founding of Latvija needs yet to be fully researched, written, and admitted. For the time being, the fact remains that the founding ceremony of Latvia has been compromised by government propaganda. Moreover, such ceremonies as may have taken place were organized by right wing elements, not the populist instigators who—up to the ukaz of 1743 by tsarina Elizabeth against the Herrnhuters—were the REAL seekers after and introducers of liberty in what had once been the territory of Livonia Livonia. Even so, when the founding of Latvija was announced as accomplished, the Soviet Cheka, in its early days manned mostly by Latvijans (apparently populists in outlook), wanted to return to Latvija, but were not allowed by Moscow authorities (Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Dzerzhinsky, Stuchka, etc.), because it would weaken the Cheka significantly. Of course, the entente-backed provisional Latvijan government did not want them either.

A paradox occurred when Latvijan Bolshevik intelligentsia, headed by Peter Stuchka , the brother-in-law of aforementioned Latvian nationalist poet Rainis, the same who along with a few other poets, writers, playwrights sketched in the literary portrait of Latvians, and who never stopped believing that the presidency of Latvija belonged by all rights to him—never sought Latvija’s independence. As the leader of the Soviet Latvijan government of Iskolat, and the first President of the Soviet Supreme Court, Stuchka had a catholic-globalist-federalist-cityzen political perspektive, and never imagined Latvija other than part of a federated factory known as the Soviet Union.

Even with all the misplaced baggage to weigh down its community spirit, a much more sinister ideology, one rooted in the Great Schism that divides Christianity since 1054, was at the root of the foundering* sovereign Latvija. While the reasons given today for the Schism are faked**, the reasons for the continuity of lies are that these erect a globalist and elitist outlook over a populist and sovereignist (autocephalist) outlook, which bring to our attention the conflict between the virtual and actual founders of the Latvian nation. It is important to note this, because the initiators of Latvijans as a people of modern times were Populists of the countryside, not Populists or Elitists of the city. The latter became subjected to globalists, who were of the victorious WW1 entente group of capitalist nations come to Eastern Europe to found a state that would be preconditioned (by law) to have no objections in joining—at an opportune time—a federalized Empire of Europe led by anglo-saxon taxcollectors.

*The postsoviet Latvian government surrendered its sovereignty to the Eiropean Central Bank (ECB) in 2014, when it abandoned its currency, the lats, for the euro. V.Dombrovskis, the postsoviet Latvian PM responsible for the surrender of sovereignty was rewarded with a directorship at the ECB.

**Jesus, the last Sacred King and God of archaic Christianity, is not buried in Jerusalem, Israel, but at Boykoz, upper Bosphorus, on theTurkish side of the narrow. According to the Alexiad by Anna Comnena, Basil the Bogomil, aka Basil the Physician or perhaps John the Baptist—who this author believes were kaleidoscoped into one Jesus—was incinerated at the Hippodrome in Constantinople. If one takes the chronology of Western history with a grain of salt, Jesus’s death occurred only in the 11^th or 12^th centuries. Anatoly Fomenko is right—the Scaligerian chronology is a dysfunctional serial of events. The so-called 4^th Crusade of 1204 (more likely the 1^st), which gathered the herders of northwestern Europe to go on a fake rescue-revenge mission of the Sacred King cum God, occurs close to the date (1209) that Jersika/ Jerusalem of old Lithuania gets destroyed.