The Great Grandson of God and City Monsterzs
By © E. Antons Benjamiņš,
2017
It has come to be that the
atheist-controlled community of government has become the fake Godhead over the
community of Nature. Likewise, government has made itself to become the People.
Endnote 3:
Voices Cannot Share
Last week I had the displeasure
of viewing a link
that proves yet again that the mindset of urban humankind is focused on a Virtual
and unsustainable reality. The sociologist (in the link) who is giving the talk
on ‘religion’ clearly does not know anything about religion (and he is not the
only such sociologist), yet sells his ideology as if he were an envoy sent from
Gomorrah, as if death is the force that rules, and he is the one chosen to
judge the past and laugh off fake news.
True, the Gomorrahn could point
at my EC606/Addendum, push his finger at me, and say that only a self-serving maniac
is mad enough to claim that God originates in the effort to form humankind’s early
government, which was of Sacred Kings (because they sacrificed their lives for
their communities), and call them Gods*.
*In
Norse mythology God is known as Jod/Yod. This is because the consonant J may on occasion also be pronounced as
G. This drift of consonants was partially
stopped with the replacement of the spoken word by the written word. A similar
misfortune befell the word ‘gans’/Yans (John, Jon, Huan), meaning herder. The name
of the Latvijan Gans Festival was changed at a late date to ‘Jahnyi’, and today
virtually no one can imagine that the Festival was ever called other, or that
the fires lit in the evening were once lit to scare off wolves not to for kids
to jump over.
I may respond by pointing
out that those who wrote the Bible (Genesis 6) also were ‘mad’ enough to write
that “the
sons of God” married “the daughters of men”, and
millions have read the words and have not been put off by them. In effect, when
the Bible was written (most of it during the Middle and latter part of the
Middle Ages) a good portion of humankind was in its heart of hearts still
living in the wood and was not persuaded that government conducted “democratically”
(by warriors and oligarchs) is anything but a sleight of hand guaranteed to fail.
The ‘Johns’ or ‘gans’ who herded elks and wore elk or wolf skin mantles [in
ancient Egypt they (2) wore
leopard skins] to better impress their authority on their livestock. The kingdoms
of old used to guarantee for themselves the existence of God by putting the
life of their Kings in escrow. Today’s humankind (ensconced in the city and with
tendrils of asphalt sucking up the lifeblood of the countryside) puts in place
of an escrow a ‘tactical’ nuclear shell in the bore of a howitzer. The ‘canon’
(a word with a couple of meanings) is secularism’s guarantee that any Sacred
King who attempts to rise from the ashes will be killed by those who
guarantee us democracy*.
*A
quote from Mao Tse-Tung (Little Red Book, p309): “In the sphere of theory,
destroy the roots of ultrademocracy. First, it should be pointed out that the
danger of ultrademocracy lies in the fact that it damages even completely
wrecks the Party organization and even weakens or completely undermines the
Party’s fighting capacity, rendering the Party incapable of fulfilling its
fighting tasks and thereby causing the defeat of the revolusion. Next, it
should be pointed out that the source of ultra-democracy consists in the petty
bourgeoisie’s individualistic aversion to discipline....” It should also be
pointed out that while Mao Tse-Tung erred (following Marx, Lenin and Stalin) by
calling for a revolution on behalf of the ‘workers’ instead of the people of
the countryside, the bourgeoisie is of the cities where the plague of
Virtuality rules. In Mao’s imagination the Party stood for the authority of a
King. One of the lessons of so-called Industrial Revolution is that it is a
particularly viscious intrusion of fake reality into the Real. Fortunately, it
is but a temporary intrusion; unfortunately, it will end with many millions dead.
Today the the state of terror
that is necessary to maintain Virtual reality, is not limited to the Sacred
King. By our day terror has been spread (‘democratically’) throughout society.
Terror (of death) no longer grips only the heart of a King, but nests a
sinister presence in the heart of everyone who lives in our time.
However, globalization of
fear is a phenomenon not limited to the 21st century. In the 20th
century philosopher Walter Benjamin described our time as being in a ‘state
of emergency’. Such a time likely began when humankind
was first divided into to two groups: the armed elites and disarmed commoners;
and the elites wrote for themselves a new ‘catholic’ religion, and began to tax
the commoners. Not surprisingly, the Catholics of neo-Christian fame ‘saved us’
and sent the gullible commoners Jesus to empathize with*. Neo-Christianity asked
of Christians nothing more than to “feel good”—as
the Cross mounted on helicopters whirls and drops them money from Pope Draghi
in the sky.
*The
book of Revelations mentions the number 144,000 , which is a numer no one quite
knows the meaning of. Why is this? Most likely because the 144,000 are
forgotten kings and Gods who gave their lives to their communities. John 15:13:
“Greater love hath no
man than this, than a man lay down his life for his community.” While
most New Testament ‘translations’ substitute ‘community’ with the word
‘friends’, the difference in meaning is clear and suggests that ‘friend’ is a fake
word willfully inserted.
What this author is adding
to the equasion is that the real victims are less the workers (though they are indeed
victims), but the people or what I call force
de gens* [not force de loi (law)].
The word ‘loi’ may have once meant ‘people’—as the word Leute means in German to this day and lude in English (still in use in the 19th century)—who
once upon a time lived off the economy of their own labor—the people of the
wood, river bank, lake or sea shore, and field.
*Gens—a
French word meaning people, but like the same word in Latvian, re: gans, meaning
herder. In Latvian, too, ‘Jānis’ is no longer a name that means people, but denotes
a mythic figure who returns home every Midsummer. This change in meaning of the
word probably came about because in its prehistoric use the word had a sacral
meaning, which Catholic Christian clergy could not tolerate. Thus, in the long ago
the words the English sang on their Midsummer festival were: “Summer is icumen in, lude (not loude) sing all sing (not cookoo)”. Uhja =
Luhja = lihgo in Latvian. Summer is icumen
in,/ lude sing alle uhja! It is likely that in Old Latvian the word ‘uhja’ meant
song. Today the word is but an exclamation, generally used in response to
someone swearing, re: “Uhya, uhya!”; meaning (sarcastically) “That is some song
you are singing!”
- 30 -
Herewith
ends
The Great Grandson of God and City Monsterzs
Next
blogs begin a new book
The Amazingly Slow Death of
Communist Latvijans
No comments:
Post a Comment