A Waterless Flood I (7)
©
The title of this blog
comes from Margaret Atwood’s novel called “MaddAddam”, a story of global
disaster in the near future http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/maddaddam_20130920.
Though I have not read the
novel, which on other occasions would disqualify me from making further
comments, for all that this is not unusual. This is not the first time that I
have met up with the problem, when a sidebar tells the reader “to see long
excerpts from “MaddAddam” at Google Books, click here” ; but when I click here all I get is a short bio of the
author and no ‘long excerpt’.
In short, the reader is
left with this blogger’s own version of ‘a waterless flood’—words ad infinitum.
‘A Waterless Flood’ is a reference within Atwood’s book, offered
to us through its reviewer, Michael Dirda, to one “…
Adam One, who has long foretold the coming of a Waterless Flood that will cleanse the sordid and polluted
Earth...”, (www.truthdig.com).
In any event, to return to
the theme of the preceding blog: Zbigniew Brzezinski’s geopolitics as expressed
in his book “The Grand Chessboard”, which example I was using to facilitate a
discussion of the future of Russia.
What
complicates the situation for Russia
is less American geopolitical ambition, but a reawakened China making claim on the natural resources of Eurasian
territories such as Kazakhstan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93Kazakhstan_relations
formerly subordinated to the Soviet Union . China is also said to want to lease some 6% of Ukrainian soil to grow harvests for itself. What
makes China ’s claim not only
potentially violent, but also Revolutionary is Brzezinski’s attempts to reduce
Russia and China vis-à-vis
the U.S.A. —to
‘regional’ powers; which neither of them intends to be reduced to.
Interestingly,
in the long term, protesting their status as ‘regional’ powers, causes the
interests of Russia and China coincide.
If they enter into a conflict with each other, they act in the interest of the U.S. and its
European allies (military and corporate). The Revolutionary potential in the
conflict of interests is for Europe, Russia, and China to radically change
their geopolitical perspective (Europe, after all, too, is no more than a
‘regional’ power from Brzezinski’s perspective), and work toward integration of
their political entities into a vast new geopolitical landmass called Eu-Ru-Chi
http://www.livescience.com/18387-future-earth-supercontinent-amasia.html
. This makes vastly better sense than a bank led geopolitical structure such as
TAFTA http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-us-eu-transatlantic-free-trade-agreement-tafta-big-business-corporate-power-grab/5352885 currently
in the making.
Impossible
as integration of Europe and Asia may seem, it
is not an impossibility. The real obstacle
to it is the imbalance of populations, the Chinese population being some six
times larger than that of Russia .
However, this problem can be overcome is Russia
sees a way to integrate with the nations of Europe .
There may
be no way around such an integration because the U.S. has military superiority many
times over the military power of Russia and China combined and is implementing
a strategy of surrounding Ru-Chi with military bases and missiles capable of
delivering nuclear explosives. To short-circuit the military threat, Ru-Chi
need to discover other means of undermining American and European military
strategy. One such way is to reexamine the historical chronology concocted by
both these ‘false flag’ powers. This brings us back to the Russian
mathematician and historian Anatoly Fomenko http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0U7OUULZs4
.
Of
course, I am not saying that the claims by Fomenko do not need to be further
examined. Nevertheless, Fomenko’s research leaves little doubt that the
chronology of history as presented to us by the academies of the West need reanalysis, which is likely to bring
about a historical scandal, a reset of chronology, and a likely rearrangement
of sequence of events.
If as
this writer suspects, the chronology of history is closer to Fomenko’s
proposals than that of the Council of Trent (1545-1563) and the Catholic
Church, the nationalisms brought into
being by Enlightenment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment
(an unwelcome and unintended consequence) and communal loyalties centered on
language, may be replaced by loyalties to the the organic environment, which is
in a state of collapse at this time.
In
Memoriam: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-05/man-who-lit-himself-fire-national-mall-has-died
No comments:
Post a Comment