EC 569 at http://esoschronicles.bl ogspot.com/

Mirror Mirror at the Head of My Bed

By © Ludis Cuckold

Tribal Consciousness 2

The concrete and glass walls of academic institutions and their contempt for subjective thought of homo sapiens notwithstanding, the glans sex of the latter percieves the object—which the transgendered professors of the English Department at Princeton U. have in mind— more accurately than the professors. I am thinking of the subjectivity that rules when Joyce’s Leopold Bloom and Molly Bloom speak. Most of what they spoke or thought is for ever lost.

Subjective thinking in a world that is contemptuous of it and limits itself to ‘scientific thinking’ surely is a “no” in a universe, where Molly’s “I said, yes… I will, yes…” echoes to Leo’s “Say, yes, my mountain flower…” is tread into transgendered academic hamburgers.

… forgive us city people, for we know not what we think, say, or do! !

Here is what I recently wrote Daisy about the separation of body, mind, and spirit. I was encouraged to transgress my ‘through presence only’ method of teaching with a linear missive after several days of ingesting muscaria amanita, which I did after a few years of abstinence. The encouragement came as a result of this being the right season (tis August, and I had the chance to buy four pails full of amanitas from my neighbors who fear the amanita is ‘poisonous’), and a spell of time during which I had cpme to feel that my mind had begun to stagnate.

A day earlier, I had told Daisy about an experience I had after ingesting an amanita. I spoke about my experience, because I wished to suggest to Daisy* that she, too, try it.

*At this time, Daisy continues to exhibit many timid traits (which I discuss in Part 1 and 2 of this 3 part 'book'), and the story about the mushroom being ‘poisonous’ has taken hold of her belief system seemingly beyond repair.

As I explained to Daisy: …the only ‘’frightening thing’ you might experience during the first day or two (or three) of ingesting a ‘poisonous’ amanita muscaria is that of a sense of body and mind separation, or what those who have had a near death experience describe as an ‘out of body’ experience. It is true that the experience of being separated from one’s body may frighten those who never have had such an experience. I do not deny that this may produce a feeling of anxiety. However, the experience is harmless in that it is but a surprise one gets used to. In a worst case scenario of anxiety (heart palpitations; onset of diarrhea), one should be encouraged to close one’s eyes, listen to Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau sing Franz Schubert’s Du bist die Ruh, have a friend hold hands, and go take a nap.

My first course meal (after any period of absence) of the amanita is to consume one middling size cap (about 5 cm across or a teaspoon of amanita powder). After brushing off the spores that cover the underside of the crown with a knife, I cover the underside with butter and blue cheese (if you do not like blue cheese, you may substitute it with feta cheese; it masks the taste of a raw or dry mushroom cap that some may not be used to*), then thoroughly chew and swallow.

*the fat content of butter and cheese may be important in activating the chemicals inherent in the cap of tbe amanita. While I do not know if it is essential, I know it is essential if one takes marihuana as tea, butter must be added. This is why on a long ago trip to India, I was offered marihuana in a cup of unskimmed buffalo milk and Tibetans offer tea with yak butter.

If the portion produces no results (one middling cap is my recommendation for first time users), repeat dose on the following day, with the brave ones perhaps adding a second mushroom cap. There need not be a rush. If you feel apprehensive, take a year off. If you are determined enough, the experience will not escape you;--you will be haunded by memories of failure until you overcome it. On the third and fourth day, take whatever amount of mushrooms your up to date experience leads you to think you ought to take. I seldom exceed three mushroom caps. I am reminded of the sensation I had some sixty years ago when I first smoked a marihuana joint from one end to the other. I giggled only the second time around a year later.

So, this is what I told Daisy: “In the beginning God created Eve, and Eve created for herself a companion she named Adam. At this time, both Eve and Adam had not yet had an out of body experience, but were wholy in-body creatures.

“Then one day both Adam and Eve went berry picking, and when they got to a berry grove they knew, they were met there by a snake who addressed them: “Pssst! Der Feind hoert mit!* I know something you don’t know! If you follow me, I will show you what it is.”

*”Psst!The enemy is listening in”. The message of certain German posters during WW2 warning not to speak publicly of military movements

EC 568 at http://esoschronicles.blogspot.com/

Mirror Mirror at the Head of My Bed

By © Ludis Cuckold

Tribal Consciousness 1

As the link argues here, globalizers:””…present the system as if it is a ‘new’ idea:” This is yet another lie. Globalism is merely another expanded form of centralization (or collectivism), and centralization has been the prevailing tool of cultural control for ages.”

As my attempts to discover the outlines of the deliberately falsified history of the West indicate, I agree with the statement by the link’s author whole heartedly.

On the other hand, the author of the link fails to tell us what the history of the ‘prevailing tool of cultural control for ages’ is or WHAT IS the off the road route of evolution of our false flagged history? Because the question goes unanswered, it is fair criticism that the link’s author fails to display interest in just who wrote and who conspires to control the history of our so-called West?

The author pretends to present us with a controversial idea, but effectively plays it safe. We do not hear anything about why the history of our origins is obscured by the allegedly supernatural origin of Jesus Christ, the Santa Claus of our obnoxious pseudo scientific(?) civilization built with tax payers’ money, elitist generated disinterest in history, and fascism (including fascist democracy) at the foundation of elite led Western tribalism. Would be reformers such as pretentious leftist Hedges do not significantly differ from pretentious rightist Dawkins. Of course, many Americans are illiterate, but are those who write and read books any better?

True, the route traveled by the idealogues of globalization is obscured by off the record secret meetings at any number of roadside inns, but by no means does the author of the link exhaust the list of those (conspiracy theorists?) who are trying to open the curtains and let in more light. He remains as intimidated as most political scientists or commentators when it comes, for example, to:

Anatoly Fomenko, the Russian mathematician turned part-historian. Fomenko’s research in historical topography (the layering of one story of history over that of another) is a major contributor* to our understanding of history outside the linear realm of Western neo-Catholic and academic historical construct. Unfortunately, Fomenko (and history) suffers from the same controls the ‘billionaires’ club’ exerts over governments and the media: to repress public interest in examining the notion that the Western version of the history of homo sapiens is an extended lie in support of use of violence (and elites) as a tool for imposing order over Western society.

*Topography of history—the  opposite pole of linear history, which  is committed to playing the same story over and over again and pretending it is not so. With the aid of the written word such pretending is easy to do, i.e.: just add--++++--one episode to the nextr. A verbal history (Homer’s Ulysses, Virgil’s The Aenid, Dante’s Divine Comedy, etc). makes the truth of history as an episodic and repetitive occurance obvious.

Tribal consciousness is of course part of early humankind, and it served humankind well when it dwelled in forest and field. Indeed, this is where true nature—like it or not—of ‘democratic’ government was tested and revealed. However, the notion that it can serve equally well a citified civilization is absurd, yet barely noticed.

Is not life in nature and life in city a twain that can never make meet within the biosphere of our planet? How does one compare a flower to an electronic sign or a stamped on paper or made of paper flower?

Because the city is of a fascist ego from the moment of its inception, no political party there escapes having to eventually discover that it has a fascist heart when all the wallpaper it is wrapped in gets removed. St. Augustine’s infamous “The City of God” ought to be viewed as one of the first anti-nature and pro-virtualist tracts ever. It is not in the city (though not without it), but in Nature that homo sapiens discovers the self-nurturing economy that will sustain homo sapiens on this or any other planet.

This is a fact that escapes most would be reformers. They all have bought into the notion that the individual is entitled to live a life with no pain, i.e., there is no separation of mind from body when the body is perceived as having been resurrected already. They forget that pain (come any disaster) may be endured only with the mindful support from a community. But the community is a helpful entity only because of a Spirit (and not a factory) that wills itself be a community.

Does consciousness perhaps come to Earth to train in Spirit?

EC 567 at http://esoschronicles.blogspot.com/

Mirror Mirror at the Head of My Bed

By © Ludis Cuckold

Self, God, and Fascism

Doubt is a seed sown by governments in the soil of Self in a world made by God. As explained below, God may be the Doppelganger of Death.

Doubt began with taxation imposed on Neanderthal* man by a recently risen tribe of violent homo sapiens. These homo sapiens arose from reindeer herders (possibly crossbred Neanderthals), who were trapped in northern Europe by a flood (possibly called Storrega) that cut off their return route south. The entrapment and the harsh conditions that prevailed within the entrapment, which the surviving herders had to endure, turned them from a culture of worshipers of life or anthropomorphs, into a culture of greedy (and hungry) killers.

*Neanderthal—here the name is used in a symbolic sense, and describes homo sapiens living in a natural environment that is friendly to their needs.

I am here presuming that we are the descendants-successors of their conditioning. (Only John or Jesus attempt to uncondition them.) We have not been able to let go of that conditioning. We have some would be reformers, but they they have made the false story propagated by Western history their religion, and, therefore, any reform turns into empty dream.

Because homo sapiens in our time have habituated themselves to support a culture of violence, he-she fails to see the possibility that ‘we’ may at another time have come of a culture that was willing to subject itself without fear to a death it called God.

Death may have been called God by homo sapiens in order they could escape the mark of Cain, i.e., becoming killers. Homo sapiens were happy to leave the matter of death to God who they did not fear, but were in awe of.

While the possibility of the word for God originating in Death may seem implausible to modern humans, there is plenty of evidence this was not so in the culture which preceded the Vikings. The latter were homo sapiens first trapped in northern latitudes by the flood unleashed by a natural catastrophe most likely caused by the melting of the glaciers of the Ice Age. The evidence of a gentler predecessor culture is deposited in the languages of the people who were later subjected to the cult of taxation, which cult subjected them to a civilization in permanent want, permanent state of unhappiness, war, doubt, and Godlessness (also deathlessness).

One such language (in spite of the disrespect it presently receives from its own) is Latvian. Contrary to the habit of turning words into pseudo objects by writing them onto paper or digitizing them into a computer, Latvian and other languages of its kind retain the ability to turn the objects/ nouns they describe into the ‘ghosts’ the nouns had always been. Specifically, the ‘ghost’ is the endearing word which our civilization of grammarians and compulsive objectifiers call the ‘diminutive’. Latvian (once but a spoken language and never intended by the people who used it to be other) anthropomorphizes and to this day retains the ability to ‘re-vaporize’ every objectified word into the ghost the mind ever intends it to be.

Our catholic and globalist fascist secular rulers (governments, cities,  universities, and an endless number of mind boggling organizations) do their best to destroy the languages homo sapiens once created and continue to retain the ability to create yet again.

A timely illustration of institutionalized mental illness is offered by Princeton University, which institution has issued a call for homo sapiens to stop using words of a ‘gender inclusive ’ nature (example: don’t use actress; use actor). Apparently the university does not realize (or realizes all too well) that it is putting its institutionalized mindset in service of genocide of peoples and languages dependent on gender inclusive inflections. Of course, Princeton U. will not admit that its academic authoritarianism turns the very Self of homo sapiens, into that of fascist ideologues*. Which ideology tries to erase the language of homo sapiens with a virtual language from this or that Zombie University.

*Fascist—(the simplest definitionthat  I know of:) everything for the Ego of any institutionalized Self.