Mirror Mirror at the Head of My Bed
By
© Ludis Cuckold
Tribal
Consciousness 1
As the link argues here, globalizers:””…present the system
as if it is a ‘new’ idea:” This is yet another lie. Globalism is merely another
expanded form of centralization (or collectivism), and centralization has been
the prevailing tool of cultural control for ages.”
As my attempts to discover the
outlines of the deliberately falsified history of the West indicate, I agree
with the statement by the link’s author whole heartedly.
On the other hand, the author of the
link fails to tell us what the history of the ‘prevailing tool of cultural
control for ages’ is or WHAT IS the off the road route of evolution of our
false flagged history? Because the question goes unanswered, it is fair
criticism that the link’s author fails to display interest in just who wrote and
who conspires to control the history of our so-called West?
The author pretends to present us with a controversial idea, but effectively plays it safe. We do not hear anything about why the history of our origins is obscured by the allegedly supernatural origin of Jesus Christ, the Santa Claus of our obnoxious pseudo scientific(?) civilization built with tax payers’ money, elitist generated disinterest in history, and fascism (including fascist democracy) at the foundation of elite led Western tribalism. Would be reformers such as pretentious leftist Hedges do not significantly differ from pretentious rightist Dawkins. Of course, many Americans are illiterate, but are those who write and read books any better?
True, the route traveled by the idealogues
of globalization is obscured by off the record secret meetings at any number of
roadside inns, but by no means does the author of the link exhaust the list of those
(conspiracy theorists?) who are trying to open the curtains and let in more
light. He remains as intimidated as most political scientists or commentators
when it comes, for example, to:
Anatoly Fomenko, the Russian
mathematician turned part-historian. Fomenko’s research in historical
topography (the layering of one story of history over that of another) is a
major contributor* to our understanding of history outside the linear realm of
Western neo-Catholic and academic historical construct. Unfortunately, Fomenko
(and history) suffers from the same controls the ‘billionaires’ club’ exerts
over governments and the media: to repress public interest in examining the
notion that the Western version of the history of homo sapiens is an extended lie in support of use of violence (and
elites) as a tool for imposing order over Western society.
*Topography
of history—the opposite pole of linear
history, which is committed to playing
the same story over and over again and pretending it is not so. With the aid of
the written word such pretending is easy to do, i.e.: just add--++++--one
episode to the nextr. A verbal history (Homer’s Ulysses, Virgil’s The Aenid,
Dante’s Divine Comedy, etc). makes the truth of history as an episodic and
repetitive occurance obvious.
Tribal consciousness is of course
part of early humankind, and it served humankind well when it dwelled in forest
and field. Indeed, this is where true nature—like it or not—of ‘democratic’
government was tested and revealed. However, the notion that it can serve
equally well a citified civilization is absurd, yet barely noticed.
Is not life in nature and life in city
a twain that can never make meet within the biosphere of our planet? How does
one compare a flower to an electronic sign or a stamped
on paper or made of paper flower?
Because the city is of a fascist ego
from the moment of its inception, no political party there escapes having to
eventually discover that it has a fascist heart when all the wallpaper it is
wrapped in gets removed. St. Augustine’s infamous “The City of God” ought to be viewed as one of the
first anti-nature and pro-virtualist tracts ever. It is not in the city (though
not without it), but in Nature that homo
sapiens discovers the self-nurturing economy that will sustain homo sapiens on this or any other planet.
This is a fact that escapes most
would be reformers. They all have bought into the notion that the individual is
entitled to live a life with no pain, i.e., there is no separation of mind from
body when the body is perceived as having been resurrected already. They forget
that pain (come any disaster) may be endured only with the mindful support from
a community. But the community is a helpful entity only because of a Spirit
(and not a factory) that wills itself be a community.
Does consciousness perhaps come to
Earth to train in Spirit?
No comments:
Post a Comment