EC 565

Mirror Mirror at the Head of My Bed

By © Ludis Cuckold

Love Without A Will

The Bible is not altogether devoid of eros, as sex is not the only way of loving. Indeed, eros is not simply sexual desire. Unfortunately eros in our time comes mostly in the guise of pornography, which is a manifestation of a focus of love via the sexual organs and denial of emotional life that includes pleasure and pain both.

Love in our times is like a computer driven car: it will go where ever the government, which has disconnected the driver and passengers from driver’s wheel by monopolizing the authority of taxation (and through ‘democract’ the word), tells the vehicle where to go. Such a monopoly over ‘The way’ (once meaning how to live one’s life) is nothing short of indirect violence, and results in violent and single minded drive toward a unipolar (all pleasure, no pain) world. The map of the route comes from government circles that drape themselves in a security blanket they call ‘democracy’. The sharade speaks for itself, when ‘democratic governments’ try keep the blanket from sliding off their beds by expanding sexuality from a nature determined heterosexual relationship into city determined phenomena called ‘transgender’ sexuality making randezvous at unisex toilets (beginning in schools) the “HOT”* spots of the future.

*“HOT” toilets: once transgender toilets become fully tested and legitimized by the court system, it is likely that such toilets will become ‘private’ establishments, acquire liquor licenses, and charge entrance fees as a matter of course. Toilet booths will be “enlarged ‘for two ’” and be known as ‘pullsex’ chambers, where the art of sexual petting reintroduces ‘the doggie position’ and licensed whores are instructors in politcorect safe and sterile sexual encounters.

The movement of autistic city people into transgenderism may be seen in negative terms (extreme deconstruction of sense of community) as well as positive ones (everyone is entitled to reconstruct community through the practice of sexual ‘democracy’). Such a ‘democracy’ may take hold (such is the aim of politcorect geopolitics) of an entire civilization if nature were to come with no limits on its resources and if the dependency of the animal body of humans were to ever become disconnected from nature permanently. While there are many who believe we are well on the way to such a disconnection, the majority of humankind remains skeptical. Marked by the imprint of thousands of years of living in nature, the majority of humankind is far from being relativitized to such a degree as to believe it can survive weightlessness for long.

The problem for the heterosexually oriented natural world is that governments that rule over it have not only succeeded in imposing on it a ‘Godgiven’ tax system, but since the end of the religious wars and the imposition of The Peace of Westphalia, they have become subject to ‘scientific’ government controls. The Westphalian Peace by stopping a prolonged civil war between two religious orientations (such as distinguished countryside and nature from the city and virtual environment) also eliminated from government religion, thereby making government unipolar in a secular way. This unipolarity and its ways, which include transgenderism, receive material support from the dogma of taxation propounded by Christianity held hostage from behind the walls of a secularized city (Romans13:1).

The readers who have followed my musings on the pathways of history from past blogs, will recognize that it is the post-Westphalian world orientation that led me to question the veracity of European history as taught in universities, and see the current version of world history as an enduring fantasy brought on by a de facto retreat forced on the natural world and the elimination of the authority of land-bound homo sapiens by cityzens in the balloon of an ever rising and insatiable civilization of city-borne Entitlements.

I must leave it to the readers’ imagination to discover how loss of religion based authority has brought us to the doorstep of World War 3, a major push toward which is manifest in the attempt to federalize the world under a United States of America dominated United Nations.

However, when eros becomes political pornography (for that is what transgender sexuality feeds on), it comes up short when it comes to love that demands endurance or needs to sacrifice the life of its bearer especially if he-she are elites. For all of its self-indulgence, pornographic love fails in will.

This is not to say that the government does not sacrifice thousands of men lives in wars, which have no reason for being. Governments do not rule by love or democracy, but by fear: if you do not go into that good night firing your gun at whomever government says is your enemy, you will die from a bullet in the back from ‘friendly fire’ directed at you by barrier troops blocking retreat. On the other hand, if you kill the enemy, then you are entitled to transgender the survivors and screw them in any way you can imagine for years after other forms of hostilities have ceased.

This is how governments perceive eros and love. The ‘only’ rape governments admits to is that of the Sabine women many centuries ago. The ‘heroes’ of governments are believed to never think of rape, for if the enemy’s woman conceives of the rapist a child, it is presumed she will love its father (therefore no longer a rapist), and through him will learn to love a criminal government.

Bluntly speaking, this is how Europe and the West were won and what government trolls celebrate.

Today almost no one believes in the perception of aboriginal people that the only legitimate government is that of a king endorsed by God. This is why in early times the was of nature, had to transcended nature, and had to be willing to die of his own free will for the sake of the people he ruled. If he refuses to die (as Sophocle’s Oedipus did), he fails to rule by example (redeem himself of his arbitrary decisions—such as King Solomon’s if he had to follow through with his threat to cut the baby in half) and risks becoming the worst of men.

Nevertheless, because governments are as arbitrary as laws written after the rape of Rome*—its early version in  Byzantium, at the time of the Fourth Crusade (1204), presumed to have been Constantinople—the fear of laws written by elites had resulted in unstable communities in all corners of our planet. Indeed, communities were held together by violence or fear of it, not by some acquiescence inherited from nature as is now implied.

*Roma, a forgotten word for a nest of a bird. There are many romas in the wood. Today there is little wood left, and Rome, Italy has appropriated the name for itself. To roam means to go from nest to nest, from rome to rome. Some romes used to be horse drawn wagons in which a people known as Gypsies or Roma traveled from place to place.

It is fear—notwithstanding propaganda to the contrary—of man-made laws that has produced the idea (Revelation et al) that it will take Armageddon to reinstate a government humankind will trust.

Queen Razhanna looks at the mirror at the head of her bed and weeps a dirge. She watches herself being raped by a cannibal. Razhanna, aka Ragana*, sees Saturn (by Goya) sit on her bed and stuff himself on her pussy.

*The word ‘pa-gan’, which derives from two words, re: lesser (pa) + Yan (gan=herder; + Ra-ganaa name that also derives from two words, re: Ra + zhenchina or zhanna, Sun+wpman, zhenchina and zhanna two Slavic words for ‘maiden’ / ‘woman’. I need ad that linguists and anthropologists have been extremely unreliable, careless, and prejudiced on behalf of propagandistic Catholic Christianity when it comes not only to history as a whole, but the history of words no less. This becomes obvious, when we surmise the true meaning of the words, re: pagan = lesser shepherd and Ragana=the Sun as shepherdess. We may deduce that the word ‘papa’ (father) derives from mysoginistic squaring of ‘Ra’, re: Ra + Ra (sun+sun in Egyptian), which may have resulted from a misreding of the Greek letter P, pronounced to this day as R.