EC 473 Hiermalgamated History
Change the World! Think It Through! Do not Vote!
Remember: What if they declared war and no one came?
© Eso A.B.
The Bigger the Gorger
Change the World! Think It Through! Do not Vote!
Remember: What if they declared war and no one came?
© Eso A.B.
The Bigger the Gorger
Hieros Gamos means Holy
Marriage, and ‘hiermalgamy’ means a forced or unholy marriage by secular
authorities of people to governments through the act of taxation or other
violent and unnatural jointings and/or divorces.
A long time ago (1973) a book called “Small Is Beautiful”
(subtitled: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered) by British
economist E.F. Schumacher was a well known best seller. For a brief moment the
book, published at the tail end of then fading world of hippies,
held the attention of the world, then faded from most everyone’s memory to such
an extent that today ‘beautiful’ may well be said to have been misused, because
as far as today’s globalists are concerned, ‘ugly’ would have been a word far
more appropriate. A similar book today would be titled: “The Bigger and Moar
the Gorgeous”: Only 0.01%
of Humankind Matters.
On the other
hand, we live in times when physics can do near anything. For example, while
looking through YouTube for a child’s toy, a cylinder-man who walks down steps
by inverting his weight (I did not find him), I found a spinning top that does the same thing. “How
wonderful!” I thought, “I have a perfect
parody for billionaire Bill Gates, who is now selling what used to be sht water
and trying to make us like drinking it; well, at least make Africans like it. Because
in Africa city life is even less natural than it is in India , which
with help from technology is turning itself inside out.
It is hard to
imagine that the authors of The
Mahabharata would ever have imagined
that Indian parents would make one of their goals in life having sons over
daughters to such degree that they would not give birth to daughters, and today
most of the sons (I doubt that it can be denied), due to the relative scarcity
of women, think of finding a woman to rape. While rape is the 4th
largest crime in India ,
the largest numbers of women raped are lost tourists or Indian women raped by relatives.
I realize
that some of the Hieros Gamos or Divine Marriage events which I am describing
sicken the soul. The good news is—who any longer believes in ‘soul’? Still,
that may be changing, as the internet gives access to information from lays and
medical people alike about so-called Near Death Experiences. As I understand
it, in spite of angry and nasty denials from some ‘scientists’ (Dawkins?) that it
is all hogwash or spiritual sht water, these give clear indications that thought
does not begin or end with our brain, but originates (Dawkins not withstanding)
from somewhere beyond it.
For all my
scepticism concerning materialist orientation, our recent (thousand years)
experience impresses with its violence and its seeming success. I have spent my
lifetime thinking about the whyfores. Was this switch in orientation that used
to project endearment due to some natural catastrophe (Storegga slides?) that
caused the ancient reindeer herders—after being trapped in northern
latitudes—to reverse their tradition of endearment* of nature to one of violence against it? (Are we not
told that our forebears made buffalo
jump over cliffs?) Was this event the seed that forced some men to turn to
the practice of animal slaughter, which pathology grew due to its unexpected success
until it reached the scale of the fur tribute, which initiated
our brutal and planet destroying tax system and the governments that rose on
the backs of our flayed
skins, raped birth canals, and banged heads?
It is through prolonged
brutality that the fur tribute, animal expendability, and war were entangled in
one braid of behaviour, which marriage (superseding gifts and alms) was at a
later time sealed by GovRmnt with a tax on life itself.
* Endearment—the English language as proof of its
recent arrival shows an almost total lack of endearing words; such as there be
are mostly limited to names, re: John < Johnny; Ann < Annie. There is no
‘flowrie’, but, yes, there is birdie.
No comments:
Post a Comment