Saturday, March 4, 2017




Fragments (winding down)
By © E. Antons Benjamiņš, 2017

15. The Shebang

In past blogs, I have written of my interest in out of body experiences, especially as these occur to those who have had a near death experience (nde). While nde is worthy of attention as an inter-mind (inside the head and body) phenomenon alone, it also suggests that at the time of death the individual may be connecting with a dream-and-mind-space that exists beyond our body container.

I have also written of my interest in the mushroom called ‘Fly Agaric’ or Amanita muscaria, especially in its use as described by John Allegro in his book “ The Sacred Mushroom and The Cross”. Because the mushroom grows within a short walking distance from my country home, I use the opportunity and come mushroom season gather a bucket full. I then separate the caps from the stems and dry the caps on the branches of a dried out sapling tree. The latter is necessary, because the caps are very fragile, and when strung on a string, the rope quickly cuts through the soft caps and they fall to the ground.

In the Latvian language the Amanita Muscaria is called ‘Mušmire’ (š=sh), which when translated into English means ‘Fly death’ or, less literally, the mushroom that kills flies. I remember from my childhood that the caps of the Fly Agaric were placed on a flat dish in which was poured a small amount of denatured (purple) alcohol. The purple was to distinguish the poisonous alcohol from drinkable alcoholic spirits. After a few hours, the dish and table about was dotted with the bodies of dead flies. To a child, the scene was something of a ‘killing field’ of flies fooled by the bright red mushroom.

As I grew older, I put aside childish things and began to think a little differently. For one, as I have already pointed out, the consonants of L nd R are sometimes interchangeable according who, when, or where the word that contains it is spoken. Therefore, ‘mušmire’ (mire = death) may also be pronounced ‘mušmīLe’ (‘mīla’ in Latvijan=’love’ in English), which means the very opposite of ‘the killer of flies’; in effect, a mere change of a consonant causes the word to change its meaning to ‘lover of flies.’

As anyone who tries to dry Amanitas will notice, the caps are prone not only to being brittle, but also to quickly turning into gooey mush. And there is nothing that flies love more than gooey mush.

Therefore, I concluded that when the people of the wood were not brainwashed by secularized Christian preachers (and they in turn by their baron masters), the mushroom was likely known as ‘the lover of flies’ or ‘mušmīle’. Incidentally, ‘muš(-a)’ or ‘house fly’ transliterates into English as ‘mush’. It is a sound that makes one think that in the long ago the Latvian name ‘muš’ did not mean fly, but referred to the mush or jellied soup that the cap of a fly agaric turns into a day or two when left be.

After the caps dried, I crushed them and rubbed them into a powder that resembled bread crumbs. I then placed the crumbs of the mushroom into a coffee cup and poured hot water over them, which I then mixed and let stand and seep for some twenty minutes or more. A few hours before bedtime, I drank the brew, and waited to see the results.

During the first few times after I drank the brew nothing much happened, exept proved (at least to me) that the mushroom was not deadly poison to me. This allowed me to increase the number of spoons of the dry powder that I added to my ‘mush tea’.

There then followed a couple of dreams which distinguished themselves from my other dreams by presenting themselves as a direct experience or what is sometimes called a lucid dream. In one of the dreams, I was witness to a German soldier sans his rifle, running down a country road. I was a sniper on a small hill trying to put the fleeing man into my sights. My shot hit the man, but apparently only wounded him as he kept running until he ran into a city. Somehow the dream let me know that the name of the city was ‘Yelgava’, which is a city in Latvija about 41 km (25 mi) south of Riga. Nowadays it is a bedroom suburb of Riga*. Next, I found myself in a hospital, where the soldier had been placed. I was looking with a nurse through his medical files. This is where the dream ended.

*In the 16-18th centuries Jelgava was the capital for he Duchy of Courland.

Yelgava (spelled ‘Jelgava’ in Latvian) was once also known by its German* name as Mitau. The origin of the name is still being disputed. Some claim that the name of Jelgava derives from the word jālgab (=jālgaV), meaning, as the link claims, "town on the river”. Others say that the name comes from the German word ‘mittel’, that is to say, a town of middle men. The latter appers  to compliment the name of Riga, which derives from ‘liga’ (=Riga), meaning it was a member of a ligue of towns and cities. On the other hand, Jelgava lies in the middle of a plain that was once part of the Gulf of Riga, wherefore (before the waters of the Baltic Sea retreated to its present location) the town was likely located at the edge of the sea*. This makes it possible that originally the town was called Litau (=German for Lithuania); and as the link informs, the Lithuanians did not give up on their city until 1345, which date approximates the time the German globalist (Catholic) invaders destroyed the Kingdom of Jersika and Uppsala.

*A similar change of topology is said to have occurred in Uppsala, Sweden. The three holy mounds pictured in the link are said to have once been at the edge of the sea. The rise of the land mass after the retreat of the glaciers about 12,000 BC was rapid, which fact is hardly recognized by today’s historians or pressed by geologists. Indeed (take a closer look at the topological link), Jersika, the capital of the proto Latvian kingdom of Jersika, may once nave been a harbor city rather than a city by the Daugava River.

Rememering our consonant conversion formula (L=R; V=B; V=D**; G=J), the name Litau may also refer to a city of Livs. The Livs* were a Finno-Ukrainian people who had settled (as herders of livestock) in Livonia before the Balts sought refuge there from the Viking marauders who were victimizing the inhabitants of the Dniepra River basin.

*The Germans occupied the territory of Livonia for about 700 years (1201-1918).  **The Liv name for Daugava, the river that cuts through Latvija, was Vaina, which makes for the possibility that its early Latvian name was Daina, which I have translated elsewhere as ‘Jaunava’, but perhaps should be read as ‘Dainava’ or ‘Donava’.  ***Vaina translates into Latvian as the name for scar or guilt.

All this pushing around of letters, and topology, not to mention consonants, suggests yet other possibilities for the origin of the name of ‘jārgab’ (=Jālgav or Ģērgav), for example, lamb slaughterhouse or leather curing place.

Indeed, such a seemingly far fetched interpretation of the topological map of the Baltics (surely encouraged by Anatoly Fomenko’s groundbreaking theories about history), necessarily blends with my theory that the (not so) ancient Kingdom of Jersika (=Jerusalem = Jēruzeme) used to be a sister community of the ancient Kingdom of Langvedoc (formerly Occitania) in southern France, which just like Jersika and Uppsala was destroyed in the aftermath of the Albigensian Crusade. The Crusade was led by a pope (possibly a viking expelled from Jerusalem/ Constantinople) from his regional residence in Avignon in collaboraton with descendants of Vikings who had settled in northern France. The one was after booty and property, the other after taxable land.

The amanita mush tea is capable of loosing many subjective pathways not imaginable to orthodox consciousness. Thus, on another occasion, I had just walked up the short flight of stairs that lead from my kitchen to my bedroom, when I realized that I was walking in a space of ‘empty air’. When I stopped to concentrate on the experience, I realized that I stood in a cocoon of space that was different from my usual experience of space. I felt outside of the latter. In fact, the space felt so strange that for a moment, I entertained the thought that perhaps I had died.

To prove to myself that I was alive, I waved my hand in front of my eyes, but my hand appeared where it ought to appear. I looked at the clock on the wall, and the dial of the second-hand was moving as it normaly does. Yet I felt somehow separated and outside of the time shown by the clock. It occurred to me that I had entered the ‘no space’ of a mirror: An uncomfortable question came to mind: “Why did God bother to create such a world?” Given the emptiness or Nothing I found myself in, it seemed like a logical question. Since my bed was but a few feet away, I went to lay down; and promptly fell into a dreamless sleep. Even so, the experience stayed with me.

Some months later, when I had made tea of what remained of my Aminita teapowder, I stayed up a few hours (to let the brew enter my blood stream). Then I went to bed hoping for a dream that would not be of the ordinary kind.

The dream brought me once again into a space that was outside the sense of time. However, because I was in a dream, I perceived the out-of-time space as a movement within a circle in which two space-times moved about each other like the half-circles within the circle of a ying and a yang. I observed the movement as occurring far below me. When the movements of the two spaces ceased, I found myself in a space like that of an elevator shaft in which the elevator was a parachute descending. Since I was located above the parachute and was looking downward, I was anxious about falling into it and messing up the dream and my descent back into space-time.

Fortunately, nothing ontoward happened, and I appeared to remain in control of the situation. At some point of my descent the parachute disappeared, and I saw at the bottom of the shaft waiting for me a taxi driver, but he was not sitting in a car on a street, but in a canoe in water. I was then roved into a dark and barely lit cave that contained a large lake, into which I then dived. As I swam, I became fearful that I may drown. I then saw a large salmon colored piece of submerged flesh come floating into sight. At that moment I awakened back in my body.

So? Why tell a subjective dream from the location of orthodox space? For one, if those who have a near death experience describe seeing their ghost rise into a shaft of light, ‘birth into time’ (if that is what the end of my dream was about) had me descend a birth canal presented as an elevator shaft.

Perhaps Einstein’s Theory of Relativity regarding spacetime is not correct, and there is but a time that becomes ever slower until it becomes a fata morgana within a mirror.

If this is so, then so called ‘dream time’ is a misnomer, because it actually refers to dream space. In effect, the ‘I’ of my nameless ghost lives in the space of a (my) body, which manifests itself as anxious consciousness in the no-time space of dreams.Time is the invention of an anxious mind that finds itsellf in a dead space. Though I cannot share with others my body time, except perhaps through brief sexual contacts with my beloved, the objects in my dream-space are interchangeable with others, as none exist other than as images in a mirror, wherefore, as but a symbol.

In other words, much as I may disbelieve it, the image in the mirror, when on its own, becomes a subject (a photo image) that has no object. But for the discovery of the mirror and invention of photography, the object would have no subject and would remain unknown to himself. It is this image of the subject that Walter Benjamin (see EC573) perceives as the fata morgana that city-zens (including Walter Benjamin himself) misperceive as real. This real has no object but for the one that is itself: virtual, (ultimately) fake, and ever so destructive of the object* that is the reason of its being.

*Because the ‘object’ is destined to become a mere phenomenon, its autonomous nervous system becomes critically anxious and impaired. Indeed, the ‘exceptionalist government’ of the United States of America perceives itself to be the heir of Catholic Rome, declares itself to be representing the Court of a Secular God, and leaves God no alternative but to resort to war that will return the ‘shebang’ to the wood.

Friday, February 24, 2017

Fragments (winding down)
By © E. Antons Benjamiņš, 2017


When human thought in a society has been reduced to the dogma of orthodox beliefs sanctioned by government, the only group that engages in subjective thought is the intelligence community. The problem is that subjectivity left to itself and without engagement with nature (yes, dogma when left alone spells autism and loses credibility), causes intelligence to succumb to runaway fantasy that ultimately bores, causes the skin to break out in cold sweat, and resorst to killing.

In the community of my origin (that of Latvija), all subjective thought among the intelligentsia has been reduced to a facade of pretentiously clever interest of what Others think in other parts of the world.* The outstanding example of this dystonic passivity among the intelligentsia is a journal that calls itself The Times of Riga. As the editor, clearly a Globalist, claims, the journal (apparently, he, the editor as publisher) has no interest in politics, or literature, or even readers as such, but engages readers on the basis of like minded passivity bordering on nihilism. This in spite of the fact that one can agree with him that there is presently no politician or government official that one would care to engage with in a discussion.

*For the most part the content of the journal is an endless series of interviews with philosophers, scientists, artists living in foreign countries. In its most recent issue (February, 2017) the front cover seemingly promises an article on the subject of “Who really killed John Kennedy. ”. I discovered that it refers to but one sentence in “John Cleese’s ‘Letter to America’”, which the journal partly reprints: re item 19, though in the Latvian version it is item 13, and the translation of the letter is incomplete.

Among the intelligentsia of America, the situation is different in that the ‘community’ of the Unites States is an artifact of orthodoxy or, if you will, of government propaganda having metamorphosed passivity into obesity. This point is best made by the fact that few videos that I have watched on the “9/11” event, have mentione that the twin towers were brought down my a nuclear device. The presentation by Dimitri Khalezov (a fomer military nuclear engineer of the Soviet Union) in above link—though there are several on the subject—gives the most complete explanation of what really happened. It is still a mystery of who specifically organized the event and to what end.


However, the 9/11 event was no mystery to the U.S. government, and was a spectacular example of ‘fake news’ by the corporate controlled main street media of the U.S. How else is one to explain the ignorance of the American public if not as a result of a long-term practice of fake news? How is one to explain that when news is presented, the American media never makes deductions, but a columnist dares do so, the media calls him a conspiracy theorist?

Some familiarity with the foreign policy of the American political establishment, will bring to our attention the fact that the U.S. has been at war 93% of the time  since 1776. What conclusion is one to make from this?

Surely, wars (if left unexamined) legitimate the government’s insistence that the country (always the innocent) is under constant threat from abroad. Such a situation legitimates perpetual war and takes place of the sacrificial king of earlier times. To quote George Orwell from the link: “In our own day they [the nations] are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group [in this instance U.S. vs Russia] against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact. The very word "war," therefore, has become misleading.”

 

War or the threat of war is a secular way of providing government with morphic resonance (for more on the subject see previous blog). In order for ‘democratic government’ to work, the government must create a mmajority mindset dressed in an orthodox straight jacket that cannot be escaped from.


In post 9/11 (2001) U.S., war (beginning with fake war on Iraq) has become a major obsession of the government and the main stream media. Well hidden for much of the time, government propaganda spilled over the top of the levee during the Clinton vs Trump 2016 election campaign. The losers were so shocked by their loss that they encouraged an overt use of fake news to such an extent that the citizens of the virtual world of the city no longer knew what was what. Since Trump became President, the situation has become only more confusing as the citizenry orients itself almost exclusively by television news and replaces the main street newspapers with the alternate media on the internet. Newspapers have been abandoned to the editors of other newspapers. Subjective thought has been reduced to the level of the Snowflakes demonstrating (rather hysterically) on behalf of imaginary entitlements for city-zens.

Indeed, one notes that the Snowflake phenomenon is of the virtual humankind living in our cities, which is why its mindset is entirely made of internalized orthodox and politically correct clichés. If at one time people like Martin Luther nailed their thesis to the door of a cathedral, today we have returned to the days when the ecclesia (in government and university offices) are once more trying to nail the people behind a globalist door.

Puddings stuffed into net bags will soon ooze out of them. Like it or not, such oozing puddings are modern governments made by democracies. All definitions of ‘democracies’ are heavily laden with BS. To put it simply: democracy as a form of government is an invention of city governments (possibly ancient Athens) after its people grew nostalgic for life in the wood, where once upon a time true democracy did in fact exist. The type of ‘democracy’ described by English BS, and said to have originated with the overthrow of the Engish King John and the Magna Carta, whereafter, England became a ‘democracy’ for the barons whose spiritual orientation was determined by the Catholic/ Globaliste Pope. This system collapsed into a civil war, whereafter England became a parlimentary ‘democracy’ in which the King could not pass laws without the approval of Parliament.

There are many arguments over whether a democratic form of government works or not. In the case of my Latvija, it clearly does not work. In the first decade of its existence (1918-1933) the country progressively moved toward chaos. It was rescued by a coup d’tat in 1933 by one of its founders Kārlis Ulmanis. In the brief span of 1933-1939, the country rose to relative prosperity, and those still living remember the time as ‘golden days’. Though in conventional terms, Ulmanis was a dictator, he is remembered as something of a king. However, in 1940, Latvija was annexed and occupied by the Soviet Union, and Stalin soon killed off or deported what little there was of the intelligentsia of the small country. Ulmanis made no resistance to the Soviets, but was sent off to work as an agronomist at a kolkhoz in Stavropol, Russia.

The tragedy of the reign of K. Ulmanis was that for lack of resistance to the Soviets or self-sacrifice as a protest of Soviet occupation, Ulmanis left behind a national community demoralized for a lack of morphic resonance (see EC590) and such cohesion as it provides. In sharp contrast are the events in  Chehoslovakia in 1948 and Hungary in 1956 and their leaders Masaryk, Benesh, in the former, and Nagy in the latter.

The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 found the population of Latvija awakening to the memory of the ‘good years’ of the K. Ulmanis regime, and expecting such conditions to return on the basis of mere expectations, which were encouraged by the propaganda emerging from Western governments. Of course, the expectations were not realized. Most of the country experienced dire poverty instead. Everything that was not tied down or behind lock and key was stolen. Even the letters that spelled the name of the first Latvijan president were removed from his monument for the simple reason that they were made of metal, and junk metal could be sold and turned into money. Not surprisingly, the bronze monument to the first Soviet Latvijan Prime Minister, a well known Latvian writer in his younger years (he turned to alcohol rather than self-sacrifice to escape his conscience) was left untouched, because it stood in view of the cemetery office and blocked the view of the First president’s memorial at the far end of a long alley of trees. The sculpture remains in its position and blocks the view to Latvija’s history as a nation state to this day, and bears witness to the success of the post-Soviet Latvian political regime in blocking out the past and replacing it with a population that has been overcome by vegetative dystonia with regard to itself.

When morphic resonance is replaced by vegetative dystonia, one must necessarily wonder how this autonomic tribulation of a community’s soul manifests itself outwardly. I think that the answer is fairly obvious: it manifests itself as alcoholism, a phenomenon that almost surely spreads as a result of morphic resonance that has its origins in a vegetative rebellion against orthodoxy*, and confiscation of earnings by taxation. When mildly drunk, the individual is able to access his-her subjective self and becomes sociable. Unfortunately, a drunk subjective self soon learns to prefer to live as an unconscious being. Interestingly, the latter state is experiencially known to a broad spectrum of society and alcohol is, therefore, often consumed before committing suicide.

*I visualize it as mildew spreading  on bread.

The use of alcohol, however, is but one of many means used to escape the control of orthodoxy or unipolar perspective. This is why it is not unusual to hear that some people feel relieved to hear when a declaration of war is made. Violence has long been known to create morphic resonance. It has been used by the military to create bonds among soldiers in military units and among initiates of fraternities. Similar tactics are used by heads of governing political parties when they compromise freshmen politicians by getting them to participate in issuing laws that do not serve the public, but serve the castle (caste) centered power pyramid.

The practices of caste may be contrasted to the creation myths of so-called ‘primitive people’ for whom the first God was a Goddess, manifest in the Sun, of feminine gender (Saura , Saule, Sonne)* in ancient times, when it was believed that all that is first came from the womb of the Sun Goddess. Later, when the Sun’s role was usurped by the male gender, whose God created the world from his body parts: the hair became forests, the eyes the moon and the sun, the clay or mud became men, and so forth. In later days the myth became corrupted, and Atum  (an Egyptian God) was said to have created the world from his seed and by masturbating.

*The consonants R and L frequently exchange places.

With the latter practice, it was no longer possible to imagine creation as a purely divine act. What had been a practice of relief from sexual tension with no particular significance, became (after the discovery that male semen played the role of seed) interpreted to be an act of pollution. In other words, morphic resonance, by whatever name, remained part of the garden of Eden until the Ego  having seized the throne of power turned it into the ‘killing fields’ (+).

Friday, February 17, 2017



Fragments (winding down)
By © E. Antons Benjamiņš, 2017

13. Morphic Resonance

Herewith a summary and recap for my English readers of my entries in Latvian in the preceding 12 blogs.

In the last blog, I cited Rupert Sheldrakes lecture on Morphic Resonance*, which term he originated to explain his theory on what makes for social groups (of ants, birds, fish, insects, and ultimately human kind). However, Scheldrakes theory does not explain to my satisfaction the exponential increase in size and simultsaneous disintegration of the human community during the last several hundred years.

*May be read as a synonym for Magnetic field though Sheldrake may disagree.

Because I am a victim of and a witness to the disintegration of the community in our era, that of Latvija in the former, that of the United States of America in the latter case, I have entertained the notion that the problem lies with the abandonment of the sacrificial king as the kingpin, as it were, the Man-God who used to be the creator (and the healer) of the phenomenon of morphic resonance (or is it the magnetic field?) inherent in the phenomenon of death. Needless to say, the effects of the phenomenon of death is fragmented and vanished* by secularism, whenever the sacrificial king is not reinstated.

*As the ritual of the ‘endura ’ of the Cathar Christians (originating in throne- or chairmaking carpenters) proves, one used to take pride in the event of death. The Cathars saw the body as a temporary (no, not evil) abode of the Mind-Spirit. Today’s secularized and fake Christian remnant has turned death into a fearful, even porno*graphic (cryogenic) event. *Porno—ancient Greek for prostitute; porneion=whorehouse. In effect, the endura was the event dedicated to the leaving of one’s earthly body  enduring a fast to the end. The process of fasting to one’s death is described in the old English legend of King Arthur’s days, re Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. I interpret the scar on Sir Gawain’s neck to be a birthmark (in the next world).

I have grappled with the phenomenon of deliberately engineered societal dissembling and destruction for about seventy-five years now. The first inkling (unconscious at the time) of the disintegration began with the dispossession of my family from its home by the occupying Soviet government in 1940. The first glimpse of a solution appeared about 1958, after I had dropped out of Boston University, where I had applied to study for the ministry, but after being rejected, enrolled in the English Department. It is there that after a brief period, by way of Robert Lowell’s poetry seminar, I regained* an interest in the ways of the subjective mind. I found the ways of the subjective mind best expressed in mythology, especially in myths of the creation and maintenance of societies.

*A determined reader from an early age (I had struggled rather indiscriminately through Dante’s “The Divine Comedy”, Cervante’s “Don Quixote”, Jule Verne’s “Captain Grant’s Children”, Lofting’s “Doctor Doolittle”, the “Bible”, and countless Latvian ‘classics’ by the age of ten), I owe it to Robert Lowell a rekindling of interest (also unconscious at the time) in the subjective mind.Though I had read and reread The New Testament as a Marine in post-war Korea, the illusion of seeming stability of society hammered into their students by refugee schools had led me increasingly toward orthodox and institutionalized thought. The attempt to manipulate words by way of poetry put a decisive end to that trend.

About 1958 (nearly sixty years ago today), I happened to read Erich Neuman’s essay on ‘The Face of Glory’.* Be that as it may, I was inspired to connect that story with that of Sophocle’s “Oedipus Rex”, which, too, I was then reading. The coincidence of the reading material led to many decades of interest and repeated attempts to rewrite the story of Oedipus, which current orthodox literary version I hold to be a deliberate falsification of the original.

*Unfortunately, I do not recall which book of his it appeared in.

My persistence (sometimes obsessive) in trying to solve the riddle of the Sphinx owes much to the cultural Zeitgeist of Latvian society at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. The Latvian language, said to have its origins in Sanscrit, still held many ancient presumptions. For eample, the Sun (Saule) remained of feminine gender. The Goddess of Fortune (Laima) was the midwife at the birth of a child. The initiators of Latvian national consciousness, the Herrnhuters (of Chech and German origin), too, had been my forebears.

My book (by way of the above mentioned blogs) roughly outlines what followed the Herrnhuter initiative in former Livonia. Leadership by example, as advocated by the pietist movement, was soon destroyed by way of numerous repressions of subjective thought. Today, after nearly three hundred years (1729-2017=288) of repression by Catholic, Lutheran, German, Soviet, and other secularist global forces bent on supremacy, the pietist God centered community, has disintegrated beyond recovery.

As one surveys the wreckage wrought largely by the secular orthodoxy of the United States of America (the exceptionalist fashist messenger of democratic order), one sees little hope for the recovery of the Latvijan community as it no longer has a grip on the golden thread of Ariadne (+) to its past. In fact, the present government of postSoviet Latvija is effectively working on the disengagement of Latvijans from Latvija’s history.

Still, I persisted in my attempts of raising Lazarus*. After returning (in 1995, after 51 years abroad) from the United States to live permanently in Latvija, it took me a long time to understand what was happening in my ‘renewed’ country of origin.

*For some ten years, I spent considerable time and money (to no avail) in an attempt to prevent the Latvijan holyday of Johns (Jāņu diena) from joining the tourist entertainment industry.

When I came to understand that the country had been ‘reestablished’ through the influence of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)* and the cooption of the Association of World Free Latvians (PBLA) in the interests of the American political establishment, a no less corrupt Hungarian assassin of nations by the name of Soros, had founded and infiltrated a number of non-governmental organizations (NWO). When I began a hunger strike to protest the elimination of the Latvijan currency (the lats) in favor of the euro, the head of one such NWO inquired rather condescendingly over the nature of my health (possibly mental). No public notice of it was ever made, though my grandfather had founded and been the editor of the largest Latvian newspapers during the days of the Latvijan community’s emergence as a country, and my godfather (de facto) had been the first president of.the country. I mention the latter only to point out that no opposition voice from Latvijan civil society has been allowed to emerge in postSoviet Russophobic government of ‘Latvia’.

*Of course, there is no overt public evidence for this. My observation is the result of hindsight and inference. As is heard said: “It does not take s genius to connect the dots”.

What has happened is that in the aftermath of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the CIA and related agencies organized a popular movement that pulled at the heartstrings of many who remembered the Latvian community as that of a sovereign country (1918-1941). The organizing of a series of emotionally charged demonstrations called “The Baltic Way”, whereafter the Baltic communities called themselves to ‘the barricades’. Alas, since the few Latvians experienced in the art of government were former Soviet officials, it is these who became the core of the government of ‘reestablished’ ‘Latvia’, which they created in the image of a Soviet idea of postSoviet Latvija. The renewed government concentrated the attention of the public on the atrocities of the Soviet regime rather than recreating a backbone that the renewed community could rely and build on.* The former Soviet officials remained loyal to their CIA bosses, as it was the latter who had retained them their privledges and held control over the public media. Not surprisingly, the files of the Cheka and NKVD have remained in bags that have not been opened to this day.

*This tactic is very similar to the incessant trumpeting by the government of Israel of the horrors of nazi concentration camps and demonization of the Palestinians. Since there is no equivalent of the Palestinians in Latvija but the Russians, the Latvian government (there is a NATO propaganda center located in Riga) of today demonizes Russia and Russians and invites the occupation of the country by nato and U.S. troops , tanks, and helicopters.

With all attempts at creating morphic resonance in the public space of Latvija being squelched by implicit and explicit ‘lawful’ and ‘democratic’ repressive acts and preparations of fake celebratory events (such as the 100th anniversary of the founding of Latvija upcoming in 2018, a year from this writing), an increasingly lethargic public fakes a Will for survival. Today Latvians are being made appear to be in favor of a restricted sovereign government subject to Brussels and NATO. Twenty-six years after Latvija has been ‘renewed’, it is already in cryogenetic storage and—barring a miracle*—it is a cemetary of long forgotten sacrificial deeds by its forebears.

*As this author sees it, such a miracle may happen only if the European Union project of globalization collapses due to the unsustainability of the presumptions of the Industrial Age and economic shock that results from it. Even then, the resulting chaos will likely be righted only through extraordinary public efforts at self-sacrifice—whereof the New World Order (NWO) will be diametrically opposed to the one being planned by the powers that be. Indeed, my book “Kirrti Mukkha” is written to make the public aware that a community is more than a series of laws supported by military might either in Washington, Brussels, or a fake government in Riga.