Eso’s
Chronicles 151
The Wing-Ding of Crash, Bang, and Doom (10)© Eso A.B.
Teeth of a Crocodile |
The premise of almost ALL commentators who write about today’s global
financial, business, social, and war crises is from a neoliberal capitalist
point of view. This goes also for the populist BRICS countries.
Many admit that the current crises is severe, perhaps of catastrophic
proportions, but the underlying presumption among most remains that: ours is a
civilization of enormous achievements, our science has discovered unimaginable
(Higgs boson?) things, our cities are megalopolises, our satellites circle the
planet and search for ancient civilizations from five hundred miles above; who
knows, maybe our brain is like a pocket radio, not a thinking machine, but a
transmitter; that transmits not God’s orders, but whatever comes from the
degree of ‘free will’ that is enabled by the virtual environment we unwittingly
create by our chicken head mentality. The chicken head becomes operational once
it sees a new white line (drawn with a Apple mobile phone?) and cannot get its
eyes off it.
One of the forces that keep us focused on dysfunctional modern
traditions is that in creating our bric-a-brac culture, we have sacrificed
millions of human and billions of animal lives (if we count them), and plants
in the process. A sense of guilt whispers in our ear that the results, no
matter how unsustainable, cannot be let die with no one to remember it;
therefore it must be kept going.
It is as if our ‘free will’ does not allow us to exit the trap of
‘creativity’ which our get-rich-quick ‘achievers’ have set for us. At the same
time, the ‘poor’ and neglected lack the communication skills to break free from
the mud http://ak8.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/2864026/preview/stock-footage-phnom-penh-slums-june-garbage-gatherers-assorting-trashes-in-slums.jpg
at the bottom of our globamare civilization.
Along with such optimism, comes a pessimism whose holders say they are
expecting a total wipeout of humankind. Unfortunately, the DOOM people do not
move their fantasy projectors further than visualizing a temporary surge in the
rat population feasting on our corpses and whatever stuff is left in abandoned
warehouses.
As correct as such visions may be, it has not occurred to the DOOM people that besides being DOOM promoters, they may also be Revolutionaries.
So, how to we get from doom promoters and conspiracy theorists to
revolutionaries? What is the line of progression?
It is not as complicated as it may seem.
First, the doom promoter may no more than intuit something as not being
quite right with the way our society functions.
Second, after receiving criticism for being a negativist, the doom
promoter notes that the reflection of society in the media mirror is one sided,
and that this is the result of the media being owned by the wealthy and
governing class.
Third, we note that the poor or have-nots have no say in the way
society is being created by the ‘creative people’. Moreover, the creative
people are creating things not for the betterment of society, but to make
Money.
Fourth, it appears that the so-called ‘democracy’ is not a democracy in
the full meaning of the term, but excludes the have-nots. It is also noted that
‘democratic government’ is controlled by the banks, which are controlled by the
‘haves’. The recent example of Cyprus ,
coming under a ‘by-proxy’ control of fascist serving German banks, is proof of
this.
Fifth, some of the ‘haves’ and most of the ‘have-nots’ note that of the
many anthropologists with PhDs none has volunteered or is being recruited to
live out his-her life in, say, Calcutta slums. Some of us may voluntarily live
among guerillas and chimpanzees in the jungle, but—unless by an unfortunate
accident such as struck Robinson Crusoe, no one has volunteered to spend their
adult lives as a non-missionary Mother Theresas in Calcutta ’s slums http://www.sonic.net/~evolve/wp/human_ecology/slums_calcutta.jpg
.
No academic has been told that such a service may earn him-her a Doctors
Emeritus and a pension that guarantees life in an upper middle class retirement
village.
Sixth, we see that the great majority of humankind, which incidentally
belongs to the have-nots, is almost totally ignored by the media. What the
media presents of the have-nots are superficial glimpses, photographs of shanty
towns, dirty faced children, stories of ill health, sexual abuse, all of which
scenes and stories blend in with the tent camps of refugees from wars http://refugeeafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/08_zam_zam_camp-640x318.jpg
waged by the haves against the have-nots.
When DOOM prognosticators are viewed from the point of view of the
majority of humankind, we begin to see that the story of he FALL of Adam and
Eve is as much a False Flag as the story of King Oedipus http://oedipusrexrewritten.blogspot.com
. The reason God chased Adam and Eve (or did he actually chase Eve in the same
sense that he chased Adam?) from the Garden of Eden has nothing to do with God’s
anger or disappointment in his creation, but with a violent king or prince
(standing in for God) who for economic reasons wanted the Garden (a wood in
reality) for himself..
Once we look at the story of Adam and Eve from such a perspective, we
see that Adam as well as Eve are happy to remain in the wood for ever. They
like to work, but only in the sense of a subsistence economy. All additional
work over and above subsistence may be viewed as taxation.) Yet in Western
civilization, we have been raised to believe that God expelled Adam and Eve
from the garden because they (or was it Adam who made God jealous?) overindulged
in sex as some chimps (bonobos) are still http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/3/l_073_03.html
.
No comments:
Post a Comment